Browse by Topic
Learn more about the healthcare finance industry's leading professional association. Find out why our members rely on HFMA as their go-to source for insight and information.
Members have many options for helping them advance their careers. Conferences, seminars, eLearning, certification, and more -- our education and events will keep you motivated.
Strategize for success with the nation's top performers at HFMA's Revenue Cycle Conference (MAP Event) from Sept. 25-27 in Phoenix, Arizona. Save $150 off the full conference rate when you register by July 29.
Learn about timely healthcare industry topics and earn CPEs with HFMA live and on-demand webinars. View the latest schedule.
Stay up-to-date in a rapidly changing industry in San Diego (August 10-12). Register early and save.
Our newsletters offer targeted articles with
technical how-to details and thought-provoking insights from healthcare finance
leaders and industry experts.
The Helen Yerger/L. Vann Seawell Best Article
Award recognizes articles for outstanding editorial achievement in hfm
Information about leading vendors helps your buying decisions.
Forum members can network during live webinars or access a library of past webinars on topics such as ICD-10 implementation, CMS audits, bundled payment, charity care, KPIs, and more.
An ever-expanding collection of spreadsheets, policies, job descriptions, checklists, and more that you can adopt and adapt.
Forum members can submit vexing questions to a panel of experts using our Ask the Expert service.
Your source for employment solutions.
Find new employment opportunities or
reach out to qualified candidates.
Distinguish yourself as a leader among your peers and advance your career by earning certification in our healthcare finance programs.
Get an objective third-party evaluation of products and services used in the healthcare finance workplace.
MAP App is a web-based application that helps organizations improve revenue cycle performance based on industry-standard metrics called MAP Keys.
Find suppliers and products in this comprehensive vendor directory for healthcare finance professionals.
Guidance for understanding and communicating about the price of health care.
Transformation toward value-based healthcare is reshaping the delivery of care, patient expectations, and payment structures.
Improve your revenue cycle performance through standard metrics, peer comparison, and successful practices.
Principles and Practices (P&P) Board Statement No. 11, Accounting and Reporting by Institutional Healthcare Providers for Risk Contracts, deals with the unique accounting considerations providers of healthcare services confront when entering into risk contracts. A lack of guidance for managed care programs which enter into risk contracts also led the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) to address these issues in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 89-5, "Financial Accounting and Reporting by Providers of Prepaid Health Care Services." SOP 89-5 was subsequently incorporated in and superceded by the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, Health Care Organizations, new edition as of June 1, 1996 (the guide).
Statement No. 11 was published in Healthcare Financial Management in August 1989. Statement No. 11 was reviewed for conformity with the guide, and technical references were published in January 1997.
1.1 Institutional healthcare providers1 are increasingly entering into contracts with managed healthcare plans that obligate the providers to provide healthcare services to enrollees of the plans in exchange for payments established under a variety of methods. When the contract exposes the provider to the uncertainty of financial gain or loss, it is generally referred to as a "risk contract." Uncertainty of financial gain or loss in this sense relates to the adequacy of contract revenues relative to contract costs -- it does not include other types of business risks.
1.2 Under a risk contract, the provider agrees to furnish specified healthcare services for a negotiated price, which may be an amount per case, service, or day; the price may vary based on the volume of services furnished during the contract period. Or, the provider may contract to provide all defined healthcare services to a specific beneficiary group in return for a predetermined capitation fee. A risk contract may also provide for a sharing of risk through the establishment of risk pools designed to create financial incentives to the providers and, in some instances, to the plan (payer), to control costs.
1.3 This statement has been prepared to address revenue recognition, expense recognition, loss accruals, accounting for risk pools, and stop-loss insurance by institutional healthcare providers that have entered into risk contracts.
2.1 The contractual arrangement between the managed healthcare plan (payer) and the provider determines the extent to which each entity bears the financial risk (or reward) for unfavorable (or favorable) experience. The contract generally describes covered and noncovered services, payment arrangements, responsibilities of the parties, and administrative policies and procedures, and may subject providers to risks they may not have previously assumed. For example, a hospital may agree to furnish all covered services to enrollees who are authorized, under the terms of the contract, by a participating physician. Where the hospital is also responsible for services furnished to enrollees by other healthcare institutions (for example, when enrollees are outside the area served by the hospital and they require emergency services), the contract specifies the approval and payment process for those services.
2.2 Payment terms are also set forth in the contract. Where applicable, risk pool arrangements and settlement terms are also described. The contract identifies the party responsible for holding risk pool assets and usually requires that settlement be administered by the payer. Also, rights and responsibilities for collecting payments from sources other than the payer are described. For example, the payer usually is responsible for collecting and has the right to retain payments from an enrollee's primary insurer under coordination of benefits provisions, and providers may be responsible for collecting copayments and deductibles from patients who are enrollees.
3.1 The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in FASB Concepts Statement No. 5, "Recognition and Measurement in Financial Statements of Business Enterprises," states that "revenues are considered to have been earned when the entity has substantially accomplished what it must do to be entitled to the benefits represented by the revenues." The risk contract specifies what must be accomplished by the institutional healthcare provider in order to earn revenues under the contract.
3.2 Under contracts that call for fee-for-service, discounted fee-for-service, and per diem payment arrangements, the provider earns revenue for providing patient services. Accordingly, revenue should be recorded when the service is provided.
3.3 Discounted fee-for-service and per diem payment arrangements may call for varying rates of payment based on the volume generated under the contract. If the amount of the payment is contingent upon factors that are not determinable until the end of the contract term, an estimate may be required. For example, a contract may state that a hospital will be paid $750 per day for the first 5,000 patient days under the contract, $675 for the next 3,000 patient days, and $600 for all patient days in excess of 8,000. The revenue earned under the contract, therefore, is dependent upon the total volume of patient days rendered during the contract period. For interim reporting purposes, and for annual reporting purposes when the contract period does not coincide with the hospital's fiscal period, an estimate of the revenue earned will be required. Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28, "Interim Financial Reporting," states, "When quarterly discounts are allowed customers based upon annual sales volume, the amount of such discounts charged to each interim period should be based on the sales to customers during the interim period in relation to estimated annual sales." Accordingly, the hospital should estimate its total volume under the contract based on factors such as current and prior period experience, seasonal trends, changes in the contract population base, and other significant factors that may affect volume.
3.4 An illustration of the estimates and calculations required using the facts set forth above follows: Hospital's fiscal year end: 12/31 Term of contract: 4/1-3/31 Actual and estimated covered days during contract term: 4/1-12/31 (actual) 6,000 days 1/1-3/31 (estimated) 3,000 days 9,000 days Actual and estimated revenue during contract term: Actual 5,000 days x $750 = $3,750,000 1,000 days x 675 = 675,000 Total to 12/31 $4,425,000 Estimated 2,000 days x $675 = $1,350,000 1,000 days x 600 = 600,000 Total 4/1 to 3/31 $6,375,000 Average per day $ 708 Revenue earned to 12/31 ($708 x 6,000) $4,248,0003.5 Throughout the contract period, previously recorded revenue may be determined to be inaccurate. Any necessary adjustment should be accounted for as a change in estimate at the time such determination is made. Prior interim and annual periods should not be adjusted or restated.
3.6 When the payment method is a per case payment, revenue is earned when services are rendered. When a patient is hospitalized at the end of an accounting period, a portion of the total revenue for the case is earned in one period and the balance will be earned in the next period. Therefore, the total revenue for the case should be allocated between the two accounting periods using an allocation method that fairly apportions the revenue to each period. In addition, if the contract provides for discounts based on the number of cases or types of cases served under the contract, the accounting for discounts previously described would apply.
3.7 Capitation revenue is earned as a result of agreeing to provide services to enrollees without regard to the actual amount of services provided. Therefore, revenue should be recorded in the period that beneficiaries are entitled to healthcare services. Most hospitals record patient revenue and the related receivables as services are rendered. Therefore, revenue adjustments and valuation allowances must also be recorded so that only the amount of contract revenue earned is reflected.
3.8 The amount of contract revenue actually earned may be affected by other factors, such as, reinsurance recoveries, deductibles and coinsurance, and risk pool settlements.
4.1 Under risk contracts that pay the provider on the basis of fee-for-service, discounted fee-for-service, per diem, and per case methods, the provider should recognize patient care expenses in the period the related services are provided to achieve an appropriate mAudio Webcasthing of revenues and expenses.
4.2 Under risk contracts that make capitation payments to the provider, there are differing views on expense recognition. Some believe that because capitation fees are recognized as revenue in the period that enrollees are entitled to services, expenses should be recorded as services are rendered. Others contend that once an incident (for example, accident or illness) occurs, all estimated future expenses required to provide covered services should be recognized.
4.3 While obligations vary depending upon the specific terms of the contract or regulatory requirements, managed healthcare plans and institutional healthcare providers participating in capitation arrangements usually are not obligated to provide services to noninstitutionalized enrollees beyond the contract period or beyond the month for which the premium is paid. Continued service to institutionalized enrollees is, however, customary, irrespective of premium payment. Accordingly, the Principles and Practices Board (P&P Board) believes that institutional healthcare providers with capitated payment contracts should recognize healthcare expenses as services are rendered, including estimates of the costs of services rendered but not yet reported and costs to be incurred for currently institutionalized enrollees until discharge. Amounts payable to physicians or other contracted providers under risk retention, bonus, or similar programs should be accrued during the contract period based on relevant factors, such as experience to date. In addition, if specific circumstances, such as contractual provisions or regulatory requirements, obligate the provider for services beyond the period of the contract, the estimated cost of those services, net of any related anticipated revenues under the contract, should also be accrued.
4.4 To illustrate this conclusion, assume that a hospital with a risk contract is preparing its financial statements as of December 31 of a given year. The hospital would accrue its obligation for all covered services actually provided through December 31, whether or not invoices have been received from physicians or outside contract providers entitled to payment for those services. The hospital would also accrue costs to be incurred for currently institutionalized enrollees until discharge. Further, under this conclusion, the hospital would not accrue costs for covered services rendered after December 31, unless it is obligated to render services to specific enrollees beyond the current period due to provisions in the contract or regulatory requirements. Therefore, it usually would not be appropriate for a hospital to record estimates of the costs of future services even though an incident has occurred.
5.1 By contracting to provide services at discounted or capitated rates for the term of the contract, an institutional healthcare provider may incur a loss on the contract. FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," requires that losses be accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Furthermore, anticipated gains are not recorded until realized.
5.2 The P&P Board believes that institutional healthcare providers should record a loss on a risk contract if future costs, including contract-related administrative costs (such as medical records, claims processing, billing, and so on), are expected to exceed future revenues and stop-loss recoveries from the contract. The estimated future costs to be considered in determining whether an anticipated loss exists should include fixed and variable direct and allocable indirect costs. Anticipated gains should not be recognized in advance of realization.
6.1 Risk pools provide a vehicle for sharing favorable and unfavorable financial experience among providers (and, in some instances, the payer, depending on the terms of the risk contract). Final settlements of risk pools typically occur at the end of the contract term. While risk pool settlement arrangements may, in some cases, be relatively straightforward, in other cases they may be complex. For instance, settlement of a risk pool may be dependent upon utilization levels, actual costs incurred, amounts available in the physicians' risk pool, and other factors.
6.2 When the contract term coincides with the provider's fiscal period, the actual settlement of the risk pool should be recorded if available. When those periods are different or when the actual settlement is not known, the provider will be required to estimate the settlement. The estimate should be made using actual year-to-date experience and other data concerning factors that may affect the final settlement. Subsequent adjustments based on the actual settlement should be treated as a change in the accounting estimate that is recognized in the period of the change.
7.1 Some providers view stop-loss insurance premiums as an operating expense and recoveries from stop-loss insurance as additional revenue. Others consider the insurer to be providing a portion of the enrollee's coverage for a premium. Consequently, they view a portion of the risk contract revenue as due to the insurer, and, accordingly, the stop-loss premium as a reduction of that revenue. Because the insurer is considered to have assumed a portion of the risk and to be responsible for that portion of the loss, expenses are reduced by the amount recovered or recoverable from the insurer.
7.2 Some believe that amounts recoverable from insurers for unpaid losses should be applied to reduce accrued risk contract liabilities, while others believe all amounts recoverable from insurers should be classified as assets.
7.3 The P&P Board believes that stop-loss insurance premiums should be included in operating expenses and that stop-loss insurance recoveries should be classified as a reduction of operating expenses. Receivables representing amounts recoverable from insurers should be classified as assets, reduced by appropriate valuation allowances.
8.1 The P&P Board believes that for generalpurpose financial reports, revenue of institutional healthcare providers should be reported at the amount that a payer has an obligation to pay. If payment arrangements call for payment of charges, that amount is reported as revenue. If payment arrangements provide for a discount, the amount reported as revenue is net of the discount. If payment arrangements call for payment of a specific amount for a case irrespective of the services rendered, that amount is reported as revenue.
8.2 The P&P Board believes that this conclusion is relevant to reporting revenues of institutional healthcare providers earned under risk contracts. That conclusion is applicable regardless of whether the risk contract payment arrangements are fee-for-service, discounted fee-for-service, per diem, or capitation methods. The guide requires that patient service revenue (which is derived from fees charged for patient care) be reported separately from premium revenue (which is derived from capital arrangements).
8.3 Institutional healthcare providers should disclose the following information with respect to their risk contracts in general purpose external financial reports:
9.1 In summary, the conclusions applicable to institutional healthcare providers contained in this statement are:
9.2 Under risk contracts that call for fee-for-service, discounted fee-for-service, per diem, and per case payment arrangements, contract revenue should be recorded when the service is provided. If the amount of the payment is contingent upon factors that are not determinable until the end of the contract term, an estimate, in accordance with APB Opinion No. 28, "Interim Financial Reporting," may be required. When the payment is a per case method and the patient is hospitalized at the end of the accounting period, a portion of the payment is earned in that period and the balance will be earned in the next period. Therefore, the total payment should be fairly allocated between the two periods.
9.3 Capitation revenue should be recorded in the month that beneficiaries are entitled to healthcare services.
9.4 Expenses incurred in providing services under risk contracts should be recorded in the period those services are rendered, including estimates of the costs of services incurred but not yet reported and costs to be incurred for continued service to institutionalized enrollees until discharge. In addition, if specific circumstances, such as contractual provisions or regulatory requirements, obligate the provider for services beyond the period of the contract, the estimated cost of those services, net of any related anticipated revenues under the contract, should also be accrued.
9.5 A loss on a risk contract should be recorded if future fixed and variable direct and allocable indirect costs, including contract-related administrative costs, are expected to exceed future revenues and stop-loss recoveries from the contract.
9.6 Actual risk pool settlements, if known, should be recorded when the contract term coincides with the provider's fiscal period. When those periods are different or when actual settlement is not known, the provider should record an estimate of the settlement based on actual year-to-date experience and other relevant data.
9.7 Stop-loss insurance premiums should be included in operating expenses and stop-loss insurance recoveries should be classified as a reduction of operating expenses. Receivables representing amounts recoverable from insurers should be classified as assets, reduced by appropriate valuation allowances.
9.8 Revenue under a risk contract should be reported at the amount that a payer has an obligation to pay. Patient service revenue should be reported separately from premium revenue. Financial statements should disclose the following information with respect to risk contracts:
10.1 The following are definitions of terms used in this statement and in the field of risk contracts
Beneficiary -- See "Enrollee."
Capitation Fee -- A fixed amount per member that is paid periodically (usually monthly) to a provider as compensation for agreeing to provide defined healthcare services for the contract period. The fee is set by the contract between a managed healthcare plan and a hospital, physician group or IPA, or other providers, and it may be actuarially determined on the basis of expected costs to be incurred.
Competitive Medical Plan (CMP) -- A health plan option (similar to an HMO) that may be made available to Medicare beneficiaries. CMPs provide a more limited range of services than HMOs, but include physicians' services, laboratory, radiology, emergency, preventive, and inpatient services. The CMP assumes risk for the provision of services and out-of-area coverage and meets certain requirements to ensure financial solvency.
Copayment -- A payment required to be made by an enrollee to a provider when healthcare services are rendered. Examples of typical copayments include charges for each physician office visit, prescriptions, or certain elective hospital procedures. Copayments can be specified as a dollar amount or as a percentage of charges.
Date of Initial Service -- The date when a healthcare provider identifies that an enrollee has an illness or shows symptoms requiring the enrollee to obtain future healthcare services.
Enrollee -- An individual who is enrolled in a managed healthcare plan. An enrollee may also be referred to as a member or a beneficiary.
Fee-for-Service -- A method of billing and payment based on a fee for individual services provided. Under a fee-for-service system, fees are established for each service. Fees may vary by geographic area. The fees themselves are established based upon a methodology that generally considers the type of service rendered, the mode of the service, and who is performing the service.
Guaranteed Renewal Contract -- A contract that guarantees the enrollee the right to continue coverage as long as premiums are paid, with the right reserved by the provider of prepaid health services to change the premium rates.
Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) -- A generic group of medical care entities organized to provide comprehensive healthcare services to enrollees for fixed, prepaid fees (premiums).
Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) Costs -- Costs associated with healthcare services incurred during the financial reporting period, but not reported to the managed healthcare plan or other prepaid health provider until after the financial reporting date.
Individual Practice Association (IPA) -- A partnership, association, corporation, or other legal entity organized to provide or arrange for the delivery of healthcare services to enrolled members of an HMO or other prepaid healthcare provider (and non-HMO patients). In return, the IPA receives either a capitation fee per member or a fee for the service rendered.
Maintenance Costs -- Costs associated with maintaining enrollment records and processing collections and payments.
Managed Healthcare Plan -- A prepaid healthcare plan or insurance program in which enrollees receive healthcare services in an organized manner so as to control healthcare costs. Managed healthcare plans include HMOs, PPOs, CMPs, and insurance plans that use preadmission and other authorization procedures as well as concurrent review to control utilization of healthcare services. They often use financial incentives to motivate enrollees or "gatekeeper" physicians to achieve prudent use of healthcare services.
Medical Group -- An association of physicians and other licensed healthcare professionals organized on a group basis to practice medicine.
Member -- See "Enrollee."
Occurrence -- The rendering of healthcare services covered by a contract with an HMO or other managed healthcare plan. Occurrences include admissions to a hospital, physician visits, or emergency treatments.
Per Diem Payment -- A specified amount of payment per patient day of healthcare services regardless of the quantity and value of services rendered.
Per Case Payment -- A predetermined payment per case based on diagnoses, procedures, or other factors.
Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) -- A term applied to various contractual arrangements between hospitals and physicians on one hand and insurers, employers, or third-party administrators on the other in which the healthcare providers (preferred) agree with healthcare purchasers to provide health services for a defined population, usually at discounted rates. Many PPOs use review mechanisms to control utilization. PPOs provide financial incentives to eligible employees to select contracting providers for care. Contracting providers are paid using a variety of methods such as per case, per diem, and discounts from established charges. PPOs normally act as brokers and do not accept the transfer of insurance risk, although there are exceptions to this general rule.
Premium -- The consideration paid to an HMO or other prepaid healthcare provider for providing contracted coverage. Premiums are typically established on an individual, two-party, or family basis and paid monthly.
Prepaid Healthcare -- An arrangement between a provider of healthcare services and a sponsoring organization specifying the payment of a fixed sum or a fixed amount per enrollee in advance of the services delivered by the provider. The arrangement may cover a wide range of healthcare services or a specialized aspect of health care (for example, dental and eye care).
Prepaid Healthcare Services -- Any form of healthcare service provided to an enrollee in exchange for a scheduled payment (or payments) established prior to the rendering of care, regardless of the level of service subsequently provided.
Provider, Institutional Healthcare -- An organization that provides healthcare services. For purposes of this statement, the term institutional healthcare provider is limited to an organization that provides or arranges to provide healthcare services to enrollees of an HMO or other managed healthcare plan.
Providers of Prepaid Healthcare Services -- Entities that provide or arrange to provide for the delivery of healthcare services in accordance with the terms and provisions of a prepaid healthcare plan. Providers assume the financial risk of delivering healthcare services for pre-established advance payments. However, this financial risk may be contractually transferred to other providers or insured through the purchase of stop-loss insurance. The most common form of organization providing prepaid healthcare services is the HMO. Other providers of prepaid healthcare services include comprehensive medical plans (CMPs), physician groups (for example, IPAs), and hospitals.
Risk Contract -- A legal agreement that exposes the provider to the uncertainty of financial gain or loss as a result of agreeing to provide healthcare services.
Risk Pool -- A financial arrangement designed to spread the risk of utilization, cost, or both among the participants, generally the prepaid healthcare plan, physicians, and the hospital. Common types of risk pools are: a gain sharing pool, which provides incentives to participants by sharing savings when costs are less than budgeted amounts; a loss sharing pool, which penalizes overutilization by sharing losses when actual costs exceed budgeted amounts; and a combined risk sharing pool, which provides incentives and penalties by spreading both savings and losses.
Stop-loss Insurance (Reinsurance) -- Insurance obtained by a managed healthcare plan, a hospital, or other entity to protect itself against some or all of the losses incurred in the process of satisfying the claims of enrollees or policyholders. Most often, stop-loss insurance covers individual claims with either high cost or long stay. The term "reinsurance" is used extensively by providers of prepaid healthcare services, but generally refers to stop-loss insurance.
Clark A. Cable, CPA
Jill E. Egan
Michael A. Engelhart, CPA
James W. Karling, CPA
Richard L. Marrapese, CPA
Robert L. Newton, FHFMA, CMPA
Robert E. Schimmel, CPA
L. Vann Seawell, DBA, CPA
Richard H. Showalter, Jr., CPA
George Shumar, FHFMA
Richard D. Telkamp, FHFMA, CPA
Jerry P. Widman, CPA
Ronald R. Kovener, FHFMA, CAE
1. Examples of institutional healthcare providers are hospitals, continuing care retirement communities, skilled nursing facilities, subacute care facilities, multispecialty clinics, and freestanding ambulatory centers.
Publication Date: Wednesday, January 01, 1997
In this Business Profile, Bruce Haupt, president and CEO of ClearBalance, discusses how a patient loan program can increase patient collections, reduce bad debt, and speed cash flow.
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
In this Business Profile, Jerry Bruno, principal with Deloitte Consulting LLP, discusses the importance of choosing revenue cycle solutions that help an organization meet the challenges of a quickly evolving healthcare environment.
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
In this business profile, Lane Jackson, a partner in the Grant Thornton LLP Health Care Advisory Services practice, with extensive experience in overseeing system implementations and revenue cycle reorganizations, discusses best practices for elevating revenue cycle performance during an EMR implementation. Grant Thornton LLP is a sponsor of the Large System Controllers Council Affinity Group.
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
In this business profile, Amy Gross, senior vice president of Key Government Finance, discusses the benefits of private placement transactions to support large-scale financing projects.
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
In this business profile, Doug Polasky, executive vice president at Xtend Healthcare, explains the importance of having sound workflow processes in a consolidated business office to ensure optimal performance and reduce costs.
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
In this business profile, sponsored by SSI, Jay Colfer, vice president of sales and marketing, shares how patient access solutions are reversing the trend toward increased bad debt resulting from the rise in high-deductible consumer health plans.
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
In this business profile of Deloitte Consulting, Matthew Hitch and David Betts explore the potential benefits of elevating the customer experience and outline strategies to change service delivery.
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
TriMedx helps health systems control costs and uncover savings opportunities by optimizing the clinical engineering function.
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
HFMA's print, email, online, and mobile opportunities provide you maximum reach and impact. We will work with you to build a plan that meets your needs. Contact a sales rep.
Stay informed about new directions in healthcare finance. Share tools and strategies for improving performance. Be an active participant in your profession. Together, we’ll reshape the business and practice of healthcare. Join us.
Of all the transformations reshaping American health care, none is more profound than the shift toward value. Access HFMA’s Value Project to discover how healthcare finance leaders are joining this transformation.
Copyright 2016, Healthcare Financial Management Association.
Join HFMA today and enjoy: