Browse by Topic
Learn more about the healthcare finance industry's leading professional association. Find out why our members rely on HFMA as their go-to source for insight and information.
Members have many options for helping them advance their careers. Conferences, seminars, eLearning, certification, and more -- our education and events will keep you motivated.
Stay up-to-date in a rapidly changing industry in Fort Lauderdale (Nov.16-18) and Chicago (Dec. 12-14). Register early and save.
Learn how to increase receivables, reduce denials and work more efficiently with HFMA’s new Certified Revenue Cycle Representative certification program.
Find out how to achieve recognition as an Adopter of best practices to earn your patients’ trust when it comes to financial matters.
Our newsletters offer targeted articles with
technical how-to details and thought-provoking insights from healthcare finance
leaders and industry experts.
The Helen Yerger/L. Vann Seawell Best Article
Award recognizes articles for outstanding editorial achievement in hfm
Information about leading vendors helps your buying decisions.
Forum members can network during live webinars or access a library of past webinars on topics such as ICD-10 implementation, CMS audits, bundled payment, charity care, KPIs, and more.
An ever-expanding collection of spreadsheets, policies, job descriptions, checklists, and more that you can adopt and adapt.
Forum members can submit vexing questions to a panel of experts using our Ask the Expert service.
Your source for employment solutions.
Find new employment opportunities or
reach out to qualified candidates.
Distinguish yourself as a leader among your peers and advance your career by earning certification in our healthcare finance programs.
Get an objective third-party evaluation of products and services used in the healthcare finance workplace.
MAP App is a web-based application that helps organizations improve revenue cycle performance based on industry-standard metrics called MAP Keys.
Find suppliers and products in this comprehensive vendor directory for healthcare finance professionals.
Guidance for understanding and communicating about the price of health care.
Transformation toward value-based healthcare is reshaping the delivery of care, patient expectations, and payment structures.
Improve your revenue cycle performance through standard metrics, peer comparison, and successful practices.
Lowering the duplicate patient record rate increases revenue cycle efficiency by improving the accuracy of information used to submit claims, collect payments, and provide care. Texas Health Resources, a 13-hospital system with more than 1 million patient registrations per year, reduced its duplicate patient record rate to 0.36 percent over six years—far less than an 8 percent duplicate record benchmark found in a 2008 RAND Corporation study.a Texas Health has also established an ongoing process to prevent the creation of duplicate records.
Learn more about Revenue Cycle Strategist—and subscribe
Duplicate records detract from patient safety by giving providers a fragmented view of the patient’s medical history, thereby increasing the chances of medical error. The negative effect of a high duplicate record rate on the revenue cycle is not as widely recognized. Duplicate records affect a number of downstream financial activities as well as other key initiatives a hospital or health system may undertake, such as the implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) or a new patient registration system.
Direct impacts on payment. Incorrect identification of patients by registering a nickname, for example, instead of the legal name used on the health insurance policy, may result in denials, subsequent appeals, and delayed payments. Duplicate records may also lead to the repetition of lab or diagnostic tests already performed but documented in a different record. If the costs of these tests already have been paid by the insurance company, they will not be covered a second time, resulting in unreimbursed care for which the hospital cannot collect.
Obstacles to achieving meaningful use. Meaningful use provides another motivation for achieving a clean master patient index (MPI). It is strongly recommended that a medical record clean-up be done before attempting to qualify for meaningful use. Also, because Stage 1 incentives are tied to the number of unique patients served, duplicate patient records result in an inflated list of patients across a health system. This artificially increased number of patients makes it more difficult to prepare for meaningful use. For example, the Stage 1 measure related to maintaining an active medication list requires that 80 percent of unique patients have at least one medication entry recorded as structured data. For 1 million unique patients as identified by patient records, an organization must prove an active medication entry for 800,000 patients. However, if the duplicate rate is 8 percent and those duplicates are eliminated, then only 736,000 records would have to demonstrate an active medication entry to reach the meaningful use standard.
EHR and IT upgrade readiness. In preparation for EHR implementation, Texas Health initiated an MPI cleanup and developed a streamlined, ongoing process to reduce the creation of duplicate records. Texas Health also sought to reduce duplicate records ahead of a transition to a single registration system that would replace two different legacy systems. Together, these initiatives were slated for implementation over a two-year period.
Realizing the impact of duplicate records on its revenue cycle, Texas Health made the necessary commitment of time and money to put the right processes and technology in place. During the two-year transition to EHRs and the new patient registration system, four key steps were taken to eliminate duplicate records:
Scrubbing the MPI. A thorough, initial scrubbing of the existing MPI enabled the organization to get a handle on how many duplicates existed and identify problems that led to the creation of duplicates. The availability of data that documents root causes for duplicates makes it easier to correct improper registration habits. Detailed information about what is happening—as well as where and how often –—enables development of overall communications, education, and training programs for registration and medical records staff. Fixing a problem at registration saves considerable time and cost later in the revenue cycle.
At Texas Health, one common reason for duplicate records was an inconsistent approach to patient identification. For example, some Texas Health hospitals registered patients using legal names as they appeared on drivers’ licenses or insurance cards, while other hospitals used more commonly used nicknames. Patients who went by a middle name with friends and family were registered under the middle name instead of their legal first name. Suffixes such as junior or III were not always used, even though the suffix was part of a patient’s legal name.
Identifying and selecting the right patient records. Advanced probabilistic matching tools were incorporated into the patient record’s “search and selection” process to help registration and scheduling staff easily identify and select the right patient records. These tools ensure search results are sorted based on the likelihood that the records match. The results are presented in a ranked and color-coded display so that staff only needs to review the top choices and select the correct patient record.
In addition, technology that improves the process of merging duplicate records was implemented to save time when records were inadvertently duplicated.
Educating key stakeholders. Key staff members in both the registration and medical records departments were educated about issues related to duplicate records, the new system, and the steps needed to avoid duplicate creation. Staff education sessions were launched and the importance of using a full, legal name was addressed. The education sessions also provided strategies for minimizing patient wait times to keep satisfaction scores high and meet productivity goals.
Many staff did not realize how a simple error at the time of registration would affect downstream activities, so the sessions also focused on how duplicate records affect other areas. Examples include:
Monitoring performance. Data integrity teams were established to monitor records, identify trends that require re-education, and provide real-time support to registration staff when they encounter problems.
At Texas Health, the combination of technology that simplifies access to correct records and alerts staff to potential duplicates, thorough stakeholder education, and consistent follow-up training has resulted in outcomes that exceeded expectations. Texas Health’s initial goal of achieving a duplicate record rate of 0.9 percent or less has been surpassed; the actual rate has fallen to 0.36 percent over the period from 2006 to 2013, as shown in the exhibit below. The low duplicate record rate has contributed to a decrease in the number of A/R days—from 48.4 in 2006 to 38 in 2012. And the enhanced patient safety allowed Texas Health to go to a single EHR platform with clean data that helps ensure the validity of each patient’s medical record.
Texas Health’s new streamlined process involving registration data scrubbing, electronic identification readers, and real-time alerts to avoid potential duplicates positions the health system to improve patient safety and the organization’s financial health. Ongoing maintenance of a clean MPI, as well as technology that provides continuous monitoring and staff support, result in patient record accuracy levels that translate to cleaner claims and faster cash flow.
Patricia Consolver, CHAM, is corporate director of patient access, Texas Health Resources, Arlington, Texas, and a member of HFMA’s Lone Star Chapter.
a. Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J.H., Chaudhry, B., et al., "Identity Crisis: An Examination of the Costs and Benefits of a Unique Patient Identifier for the U.S. Health Care System," RAND Corporation, 2008.
Publication Date: Thursday, May 02, 2013
In this Business Profile, Shawn Yates, director of healthcare product management at Ontario Systems, discusses the growing challenge of managing self-pay accounts and provides insight on how providers can successfully collect patient payments.
In this business profile, Cathy Smith, leader of the revenue transformation consulting practice at The Claro Group discusses how the organization helps hospitals and medical groups reimagine their revenue cycle.
In this business profile, Deloitte & Touche LLP executives Anne Phelps, principal and U.S. healthcare regulatory leader, and Daniel Esquibel, senior manager, explain ways health systems, health plans, and physician practices can prepare for MACRA.
In this Business Profile, Bruce Haupt, president and CEO of ClearBalance, discusses how a patient loan program can increase patient collections, reduce bad debt, and speed cash flow.
In this Business Profile, Jerry Bruno, principal with Deloitte Consulting LLP, discusses the importance of choosing revenue cycle solutions that help an organization meet the challenges of a quickly evolving healthcare environment.
In this business profile, Lane Jackson, a partner in the Grant Thornton LLP Health Care Advisory Services practice, with extensive experience in overseeing system implementations and revenue cycle reorganizations, discusses best practices for elevating revenue cycle performance during an EMR implementation. Grant Thornton LLP is a sponsor of the Large System Controllers Council Affinity Group.
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Drive down costs while improving quality in a reform environment.
Receive expert insights and how-to action to achieve and maintain peak revenue cycle performance.
Access expert insights on financial forecasting/planning, strategic partnerships, capital allocation, and more.
Stay informed about new directions in healthcare finance. Share tools and strategies for improving performance. Be an active participant in your profession. Together, we’ll reshape the business and practice of healthcare. Join us.
Copyright 2016, Healthcare Financial Management Association.
Join HFMA today and enjoy: