Browse by Topic
Learn more about the healthcare finance industry's leading professional association. Find out why our members rely on HFMA as their go-to source for insight and information.
Members have many options for helping them advance their careers. Conferences, seminars, eLearning, certification, and more -- our education and events will keep you motivated.
Strategize for success with the nation's top performers at HFMA's Revenue Cycle Conference (MAP Event) from Sept. 25-27 in Phoenix, Arizona. Register now.
Find your leadership EDGE™: Explore, Dream, Grow, & Excite in a workshop for anyone who is ready to develop and execute actionable leadership strategies. Register now.
Stay up-to-date in a rapidly changing industry in Fort Lauderdale (Nov.16-18) and Chicago (Dec. 12-14). Register early and save.
Our newsletters offer targeted articles with
technical how-to details and thought-provoking insights from healthcare finance
leaders and industry experts.
The Helen Yerger/L. Vann Seawell Best Article
Award recognizes articles for outstanding editorial achievement in hfm
Information about leading vendors helps your buying decisions.
Forum members can network during live webinars or access a library of past webinars on topics such as ICD-10 implementation, CMS audits, bundled payment, charity care, KPIs, and more.
An ever-expanding collection of spreadsheets, policies, job descriptions, checklists, and more that you can adopt and adapt.
Forum members can submit vexing questions to a panel of experts using our Ask the Expert service.
Your source for employment solutions.
Find new employment opportunities or
reach out to qualified candidates.
Distinguish yourself as a leader among your peers and advance your career by earning certification in our healthcare finance programs.
Get an objective third-party evaluation of products and services used in the healthcare finance workplace.
MAP App is a web-based application that helps organizations improve revenue cycle performance based on industry-standard metrics called MAP Keys.
Find suppliers and products in this comprehensive vendor directory for healthcare finance professionals.
Guidance for understanding and communicating about the price of health care.
Transformation toward value-based healthcare is reshaping the delivery of care, patient expectations, and payment structures.
Improve your revenue cycle performance through standard metrics, peer comparison, and successful practices.
Every day, healthcare finance professionals conduct sensitive financial discussions with patients. But there have been no accepted, consistent best practices to guide them in these discussions—until now.
On Oct. 28, HFMA announced Patient Financial Communications Best PracticesTM that provide tangible guidance for communicating with patients about their financial responsibility for health care.
“Healthcare financial interactions can be complex and confusing because of complicated payment structures, dozens of different payers and forms, and varied government programs,” says HFMA president and CEO Joseph J. Fifer, FHFMA, CPA. “When you add the reality that patients are becoming responsible for greater proportions of their healthcare costs, clear guidelines and communication are more important than ever.”
These voluntary practices address the areas where best practices are most urgently needed, focusing on financial discussions that take place in advance of a healthcare service, at the time of service, in the emergency department (ED), and in other care settings.
The best practices, which were developed by a broad group of healthcare stakeholders, provide definitive guidance about when and where patient financial discussions should take place and who should participate in them. The best practices also address the specific topics to include in patient financial discussions and provide basic parameters for those discussions. Finally, they include a measurement criteria framework for guiding evaluation of an organization’s voluntary compliance.
In choosing a PFCTM setting, organizations should first and foremost respect patient privacy. Conversations should occur in a location and manner that are sensitive to the patient’s needs.
Discussions at the time of service. The best practices specify that, in the ED setting, no patient financial discussions should occur before a patient is screened and stabilized, in accordance with the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and other federal, state, and local regulations governing the ED.
If the medical screening determines that a patient has an emergency medical condition, the financial discussion should occur during the discharge process. For patients who do not have an emergency medical condition, following the medical screening, discussion may occur during either the registration or discharge process.
Outside the ED setting, discussions may take place during the registration or discharge process in a location that does not disrupt patient flow.
Across all care settings, if a patient consents to a financial discussion during a medical encounter to expedite discharge, the best practices support that choice, providing that the discussion does not interfere with patient care or disrupt patient flow.
Discussions in advance of service. Discussions should use the most appropriate means of communication for the patient, and may occur via outbound contact to the patient, inbound contact from patients making inquiries, or through the scheduling or contact center at the time an appointment is made. The best practices stipulate that a reasonable attempt should be made to have the discussion as early as possible, before a financial obligation is incurred (i.e., before care is provided). Timely discussions help ensure that patients understand their financial obligation and that providers are aware of the patient’s ability to pay and/or the source of payment.
For routine scenarios, such as patients with insurance coverage or a known ability to pay, financial discussions should take place between the patient or guarantor (i.e., the person responsible for payment of the bill) and properly trained provider representatives. For nonroutine or complex scenarios, such as uninsured or underinsured patients, a financial counselor or supervisor should be involved, according to the best practices.
Recognizing that health coverage is complicated and not all patients are well equipped to navigate this terrain, the best practices specify that patients should be given the opportunity to request a patient advocate, family member, or other designee to help them in these discussions.
The practices detail typical elements of patient financial discussions, including provision of care; registration, insurance verification, and financial counseling; patient share; prior balances (if applicable); and balance resolution.
Provision of care. The practices state that ED patients should be informed that their ability to pay will not interfere with treatment of any emergency medical conditions. Uninsured ED patients should also be informed that the goal of collecting information is to identify paying solutions or financial assistance options that may assist them with their obligations for the ED visit.
“With the advent of the Affordable Care Act’s insurance marketplaces and the expansion of Medicaid in some states, it is more important than ever for hospitals to help patients understand their coverage options,” says Richard L. Gundling, FHFMA, CMA, HFMA vice president, healthcare financial practices. “Inevitably, some patients will learn about these new coverage options for the first time when they are in need of emergency care.”
Across all care settings, it is important to have clear and publicly available policies on how to interact with patients with prior balances. Also, providers should have clear definitions of elective and nonelective procedures, according to the practices. These definitions also should be made available to the public.
For nonelective services (as defined by the provider), patients should be informed that their ability to resolve any prior balances, or their share of the services they are currently receiving, will not affect provision of care.
Prior to receiving elective services (as defined by the provider), patients are obligated to make satisfactory payment arrangements. Those who have prior balances should be informed if the provider’s policies regarding prior balances mean the service will be deferred. “It is important to note that this does not mean patients should be required to pay a prior balance in full before receiving an elective service,” Gundling says. “Instead, the practices call for the patient to make mutually acceptable payment arrangements to resolve the outstanding balance, in accordance with whatever policies a hospital may have in place.”
Registration, insurance verification, and financial counseling. It is worth restating: In the ED, no patient financial discussions should occur before a patient is screened and stabilized. Once a patient is stabilized, basic registration information, including demographics and insurance coverage, may be gathered, and the potential need for financial assistance may be determined. The provider representative should review insurance eligibility information with the patient to ensure the information is accurate.
If appropriate, the patient may be referred to a financial counselor and/or offered information regarding the provider’s financial counseling services and assistance policies. Providers should have a widely publicized toll-free number for patients to call to receive assistance in financial matters and address any concerns they may have. “It can be difficult to focus on financial matters and urgent health matters at the same time,” Gundling says. “This practice recognizes the importance of making it convenient for patients to ask questions when they are feeling up to doing so.”
Also, when patient financial communications take place in advance of service, the provider should maintain a thread of preregistration discussions and avoid repeated requests for the same information.
Patient share. Many hospitals and health systems are striving to improve their ability to provide accurate and comprehensive estimates of the patient portion for a particular service. Even as providers continue to work toward that long-term goal, much can be done to clarify patient financial responsibilities.
The PFC Best PracticesTM specify that patients should be told about the types of service providers (e.g., pathologists, radiologists, anesthesiologists, and others) who typically participate in a service. Patients should receive a written list of service provider types, upon request. Also, patients should be informed that actual costs may vary from estimates, depending on the actual services performed or timing issues related to other payments that may affect their deductible.
If appropriate, patients should be asked if they are interested in receiving information about payment options and/or about the provider’s financial assistance options.
Overall, patient share discussions should not interfere with patient care, and should focus on patient education.
Prior balances. Provider organizations should have clear policies about prior balances, and should make those policies available to the public. In addition, provider organizations should have technology that gives financial representatives up-to-date information about patient balances and financial obligations.
Balance resolution. When patients have prior balances, discussions should focus on steps toward amicable resolution. Balance resolution discussions may occur about prior balances that are being pursued for collection by the provider, a collection agency, or other organization. The provider representative may discuss with the patient the services that led to the prior balance. At the patient’s request, the provider organization should provide a written list of the services delivered, dates of service, and the resulting prior balance. If appropriate, the provider should ask the patient if he or she would like to receive information about payment options and about the provider’s supportive financial assistance programs. The provider also may proactively attempt to resolve the prior balance through insurance and financial assistance programs.
Once these steps have been fulfilled, it is appropriate to ask the patient how he or she would like to resolve the balance for the current service and any prior balance the patient may have, and to inform the patient of the timing of any collection activity.
It’s not easy to talk about money, let alone to talk about payment at times when people may be dealing with illness or an injury. That’s why one of the overarching best practices is ensuring that compassion, patient advocacy, and education are part of all patient interactions.
“Patients and their families enter the healthcare system when they are most vulnerable, and then they encounter financial processes that are challenging even to veteran healthcare professionals,” says Nancy Davenport-Ennis, president and CEO of the National Patient Advocate Foundation and a member of the group that developed the best practices. “The early, clear financial conversations described in these best practices will help give patients peace of mind and help providers receive appropriate payment—both key objectives for the healthcare system to function with fairness and compassion.”
Another best practice establishes that the provider should take the initiative to communicate with the patient about financial matters. “When the provider raises the subject, it actually takes a burden off the patient,” says HFMA’s Gundling. Communication should include verification of patient information (mailing address, phone numbers, email address, etc.) and the patient’s preferred methods for future communication.
The best practices also direct that communication should be understandable by the patient and should employ standard language. Clinicians have long used standard language in patient discussions, such as when taking a patient’s medical history, for example. Likewise, provider organizations should have standard language to guide finance staff on the most common types of patient financial communications. In developing that language, the best practices stipulate that providers should take the patient’s perspective into consideration.
The best practices also call for patient financial discussions to be reinforced with written information. During the registration or discharge process, the patient should receive written information about the provider’s supportive financial assistance programs, and a summary of the potential financial implications for the services rendered, including a phone number to call with questions. Equally important, financially supportive policies should be communicated and made available to the community.
Finally, as previously noted, patient privacy should be respected in all patient financial discussions and conversations should occur in a location and manner that are sensitive to the patient’s needs.
The steering committee developed a measurement criteria framework to guide the evaluation of an organization’s compliance. Compliance, which is voluntary, may be recognized in one of two ways: through self-attestation, which is available now, or through an external validation process, which will be in place in January 2014.
Either way, categories that are evaluated to establish compliance include an organization’s training program, process compliance, technology, feedback process and response, and executive level metrics reporting.
Training program. The best practices call for annual training on the organization’s financial assistance policies for all staff who engage in patient financial discussions, including patient access, financial counseling, and customer service representatives. Training may be provided through a variety of forums, including web-based and in-person, and may be furnished by qualified internal or external parties as deemed appropriate by a designated quality officer. Training must cover the following topics:
Process compliance. Annual observation, monitoring, and tracking of results make up the process compliance evaluation required to document compliance with the best practices. This evaluation may be performed by any organization independent of the department that is being audited, such as internal audit, compliance, quality, or a third party. The evaluation should be comprehensive and should cover all scenarios addressed by the practices that are relevant to a particular organization.
Technology. This evaluation ensures that technology is in place to support the following:
The technology evaluation may be performed by any qualified individual or organization, internal or external.
Feedback process and response. This evaluation is designed to ensure that processes are in place to regularly solicit input and receive key stakeholders’ feedback, measure and respond to input and feedback, and ensure that patient complaints are resolved.
Executive level metrics reporting. Reports of organizational performance evaluations in the four areas described in this section should be developed, compiled into an overall compliance report, and presented to the organization’s executive leadership team on an annual basis.
Effective patient financial communications are critical to both patient satisfaction and the financial health of provider organizations. Compliance with these voluntary best practices provides a measure of assurance not only to a provider organization, but also to the patients and communities the organization serves.
“By following these best practices, providers are affirming their commitment to open and early communication, sharing clear information, and identifying a path for financial resolution that is fair for patients and providers alike,” says Fifer. “Going forward, providers should take this opportunity to leverage the best practices, ensure broader education and awareness throughout their organizations, and make these principles an integral part of their culture.”
Karen Thomas is a senior editor in HFMA’s Westchester, Ill., office.
To develop the best practices, a broad group was convened representing consumer and trade groups and other affected stakeholders, listed below, to serve as a steering committee. The committee used a consensus process in its monthly meetings to develop the best practices over the course of a year. Their work was informed by public comments received over a six-week period ending in July 2013.
The project was overseen by an advisory panel chaired by Gov. Mike Leavitt (R-Utah) that includes former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), former Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), former Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala, and attorney Jamie Gorelick.
Patient Financial Communications Best Practices Steering Committee
Pamela AtkinsonNationally recognized advocate for the poor
Thurbert Baker (Co-Chair)Attorney General (Ret.), Ga. Partner McKenna Long & Aldridge
Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr., PhDChairman and CEOThe Health Management Academy
Richard L. Clarke, DHA, FHFMA (Co-Chair)Retired President and CEOHFMA
Aaron CraneChief Financial and Strategy OfficerSalem Health
Nancy Davenport-EnnisFounder and CEONational Patient Advocate Foundation
Joseph J. Fifer, FHFMA, CPAPresident and CEOHFMA
Karen IgnagniPresident and CEOAmerica’s Health Insurance Plans
Mike JacoutotFormer CEOOptimum Outcomes
Patricia KeelCFOGood Shepherd Medical Center
Maureen MudronDeputy General CounselAmerican Hospital Association
James E. Sabin, MDClinical ProfessorDepartments of Population Medicine and PsychiatryHarvard Medical School
Mary A. TolanFounder and ChairmanAccretive Health
Robert L. Wergin, MDPresident-ElectAmerican Academy of Family Physicians
Bert ZimmerliExecutive Vice President and CFOIntermountain Healthcare
Publication Date: Friday, October 25, 2013
In this Business Profile, Bruce Haupt, president and CEO of ClearBalance, discusses how a patient loan program can increase patient collections, reduce bad debt, and speed cash flow.
In this Business Profile, Jerry Bruno, principal with Deloitte Consulting LLP, discusses the importance of choosing revenue cycle solutions that help an organization meet the challenges of a quickly evolving healthcare environment.
In this business profile, Lane Jackson, a partner in the Grant Thornton LLP Health Care Advisory Services practice, with extensive experience in overseeing system implementations and revenue cycle reorganizations, discusses best practices for elevating revenue cycle performance during an EMR implementation. Grant Thornton LLP is a sponsor of the Large System Controllers Council Affinity Group.
In this business profile, Amy Gross, senior vice president of Key Government Finance, discusses the benefits of private placement transactions to support large-scale financing projects.
In this business profile, Doug Polasky, executive vice president at Xtend Healthcare, explains the importance of having sound workflow processes in a consolidated business office to ensure optimal performance and reduce costs.
In this business profile, sponsored by SSI, Jay Colfer, vice president of sales and marketing, shares how patient access solutions are reversing the trend toward increased bad debt resulting from the rise in high-deductible consumer health plans.
In this business profile of Deloitte Consulting, Matthew Hitch and David Betts explore the potential benefits of elevating the customer experience and outline strategies to change service delivery.
TriMedx helps health systems control costs and uncover savings opportunities by optimizing the clinical engineering function.
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Drive down costs while improving quality in a reform environment.
Receive expert insights and how-to action to achieve and maintain peak revenue cycle performance.
Access expert insights on financial forecasting/planning, strategic partnerships, capital allocation, and more.
Stay informed about new directions in healthcare finance. Share tools and strategies for improving performance. Be an active participant in your profession. Together, we’ll reshape the business and practice of healthcare. Join us.
Copyright 2016, Healthcare Financial Management Association.
Join HFMA today and enjoy: