Browse by Topic
More than 40,000 members value HFMA's thought leadership and practical strategies. HFMA is where you need to be.
Get acquainted with the
healthcare finance industry's leading professional association. Find out why our
members rely on HFMA as their go-to source for insight and
Members have many
options for helping them advance their careers. Conferences, seminars,
eLearning, certification, and more -- our education and events will keep you
Connect the dots on today's big issues, explore collaborations, get career-boosting tips, and network with colleagues nationwide at the leading finance conference. Save $100 off the full conference rate when you register by May 8.
Real-time presentations with nationally recognized experts, networking opportunities, and industry solutions—no travel required!
Get the latest, practical education in key areas of healthcare finance over 1, 2, or 3 days. Choose Essentials Programs or Master Sessions in DC or Seattle. Register early and save $100.
If you're a subscriber to any of our three newsletters, you have access to online education. Learn more or subscribe.
Get the perspectives of leading healthcare finance professionals on today's hottest issues.
Information about leading vendors helps your buying decisions.
Forum members can network during live webinars or access a library of past webinars on topics such as bundled payment, charity care, and ICD-10.
An ever-expanding collection of spreadsheets, policies, job
descriptions, checklists, and more that you can adopt and adapt.
Forum members can submit vexing questions to a panel of experts
using our Ask the Expert service.
Your source for employment solutions.
Find new employment opportunities or
reach out to qualified candidates.
Distinguish yourself as a
leader among your peers and advance your career by earning certification in our
healthcare finance programs.
Get an objective third-party evaluation of products and services used in the healthcare finance workplace.
MAP App is a web-based application that helps organizations improve revenue cycle performance based on industry-standard metrics called MAP Keys.
Find suppliers and products in this comprehensive vendor directory for healthcare finance professionals.
Guidance for understanding and communicating about the price of health care.
Guidelines on how to make it easier for consumers to get information about healthcare prices.
Improve your revenue cycle performance through standard metrics, peer comparison, and successful practices.
As the United States migrates to a value-based healthcare system, one that is measured on improvements in quality and service while controlling costs, federal and state payment policies are needed to support the use of technologies and services that help to achieve these goals. Simple analysis, such as comparing payment amounts per procedure by site of service are not very helpful in efforts to bend the overall cost curve.
Physician offices have been targeted for reimbursement reduction for imaging services at levels not seen by hospitals, with 13 separate cuts in reimbursement rates since 2006.
This trend now also poses a concern for hospitals. Hospitals have struggled with how to accurately reflect the equipment costs of imaging services on their cost report to the Medicare program, with the result that many imaging services have been under-valued in the hospital outpatient setting. This issue is only now starting to be addressed by the Medicare program. Hospitals have very different overhead costs, due to several factors such as uncompensated care obligations, teaching and training activities, and the need to provide 24/7 emergency care for their communities. Yet policy organizations and researchers continue to compare the reimbursement rates for physician and hospital sites of service as if they are both apples, versus as an apple and an orange.
In its March 2014 Report to Congress, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) proposes aligning hospital outpatient department payment rates with physician office rates for some ambulatory services. MedPAC evaluated about 450 ambulatory payment classifications (APCs) and found 66 that did not require emergency standby capacity.
Aligning the payments for these 66 outpatient APCs would mean major cuts if this policy were to go into effect. Although the negative impact on hospital margins under the proposal would average 0.6 percent, the impact would be more onerous for rural, smaller, and specialty hospitals, which stand to lose as much as 0.9 percent because they have a larger share of their overall Medicare revenues coming from outpatient care.
Two of the 66 APCs would capture ultrasound services that have been shown to improve quality and reduce cost significantly. The proposed policy ignores the specific benefits of its use in a hospital setting, such having rapid access to the operating room and avoiding costly complications in surgeries. If the proposal were adopted, an unintended consequence might be the decision of some hospitals to shift from ultrasound to more cumbersome and time-consuming, but also higher-paid, radiation-dependent modalities, which pose the risk of radiation to patients. Because ultrasound poses no radiation risk to patients, it is one of the most useful tests in terms of balancing diagnostic needs with patient safety.
If payments are driven down for hospitals, the reality is that hospitals will need to respond. Management consultants might be called in to show administrators which procedures would keep their Level 1 trauma centers afloat, after which centers would shift their priorities accordingly. If quality is adversely affected, it ultimately will be the trauma centers, and potentially their vulnerable populations, that will suffer. A large proportion of the nation’s compassionate, uncompensated care is delivered in trauma centers. These centers and those they serve could be the victims of a well-intended but poorly considered policy change.
In short, making it more and more difficult to perform important procedures in the hospital setting—a conceivable result if their reimbursement is threatened—ultimately could lead to greater costs to Medicare and greater risks to patients, not to mention more limited access to care, which goes against one of the central tenets of healthcare reform. Healthcare finance leaders should advocate strongly against MedPAC’s proposal, bringing these compelling perspectives to bear.
Paul R. Sierzenski, MD, RDMS, FAAEM, FACEP, is medical director, point-of-care ultrasound, and director, Emergency, Trauma & Critical Care Ultrasound, Christiana Care Health System, Wilmington, Delaware.
Publication Date: Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Russ Graney, founder and CEO for Aidin, and John Laursen, head of business development for Aidin, share insights on how to improve care transitions between acute and post-acute care settings and incentivize high-quality patient outcomes.
Scott Elston, strategic accounts manager, GE Healthcare Services, describes how substantial cost reduction in health care requires rethinking business strategy and asset use.
Robert Williams, MD, director, Deloitte Consulting LLP, and Arielle Freiberger, product strategist, ConvergeHEALTH by Deloitte, explain how sophisticated retrospective, real-time, and predictive data analytics can inform decision making to reduce costs and improve care.
Stuart Hanson, director of business development (healthcare solutions) at Citi Retail Services, discusses how improving the payment experience can benefit consumers and healthcare providers.
Scott Schmidt, vice president, Cerner RevWorks, LLC, shares insights on best practices for maximizing a revenue cycle management partnership.
©2015 Copyright Healthcare Financial Management Association
HFMA.org is best viewed using IE9 or the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, and Safari.
Join HFMA today and enjoy: