Browse by Topic
Learn more about the healthcare finance industry's leading professional association. Find out why our members rely on HFMA as their go-to source for insight and information.
Members have many options for helping them advance their careers. Conferences, seminars, eLearning, certification, and more -- our education and events will keep you motivated.
On February 10-12, Physicians, Payers, and Providers will discover strategies for implementing value-based payment arrangements with both private and public sector payers.
Stay up-to-date in a rapidly changing industry in New Orleans (Mar. 7-9) or Chicago/Rosemont (Apr. 20-22). Register early and save.
Focus on the essentials. Develop strategies that deliver results. Redefine the boundaries of your success. Find out what’s driving innovation at ANI. Register by 2/29, save $150.
Our newsletters offer targeted articles with
technical how-to details and thought-provoking insights from healthcare finance
leaders and industry experts.
Get the perspectives of leading healthcare finance professionals on today's hottest issues.
Information about leading vendors helps your buying decisions.
Forum members can network during live webinars or access a library of past webinars on topics such as ICD-10 implementation, CMS audits, bundled payment, charity care, KPIs, and more.
An ever-expanding collection of spreadsheets, policies, job descriptions, checklists, and more that you can adopt and adapt.
Forum members can submit vexing questions to a panel of experts using our Ask the Expert service.
Your source for employment solutions.
Find new employment opportunities or
reach out to qualified candidates.
Distinguish yourself as a leader among your peers and advance your career by earning certification in our healthcare finance programs.
Get an objective third-party evaluation of products and services used in the healthcare finance workplace.
MAP App is a web-based application that helps organizations improve revenue cycle performance based on industry-standard metrics called MAP Keys.
Find suppliers and products in this comprehensive vendor directory for healthcare finance professionals.
Guidance for understanding and communicating about the price of health care.
Transformation toward value-based healthcare is reshaping the delivery of care, patient expectations, and payment structures.
Improve your revenue cycle performance through standard metrics, peer comparison, and successful practices.
Aligning clinical and financial incentives across hospital, physicians, and payers has helped Bloomington, Minn.-based HealthPartners achieve a number of important benchmarks:
This is a sample article from HFMA's Strategic Financial Planning newsletter, which helps healthcare finance leaders strategically position their organizations for success in light of reform and reimbursement cuts.
Learn more and subscribe to Strategic Financial Planning
Granted, in the race toward integration, HealthPartners is in the unique position of having many major players under one roof. As a health plan, HealthPartners covers more than 1.3 million lives in five Midwestern states with the largest contract network in Minnesota, with more than 15,000 physicians. As a delivery system, HealthPartners employs about 800 physicians (and 150 midlevel providers) via HealthPartners and Stillwater Medical Group, which include 70 medical clinics around Minneapolis-St. Paul. The health system also has a 454-bed teaching hospital.
However, there's another vital reason why HealthPartners is in rare air when it comes to clinical and financial integration: The IHI Triple Aim.
Launched by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), the Triple Aim is the simultaneous pursuit of three goals:
HealthPartners has adopted the Triple Aim as its vision and uses it in setting strategic goals and objectives. Leaders say the Triple Aim creates a cultural alignment, in which the hospital, physicians, medical group administrators, and payers are working on the same goals.
"It's a more holistic way of looking at care, and it really gets at value," says Nancy McClure, senior vice president, HealthPartners Medical Group and Clinics.
To achieve the last goal of the Triple Aim-reducing per capita costs for health care-HealthPartners actively compares and analyzes total cost of care among provider groups. For nearly a decade, HealthPartners has used the total cost index (TCI) for evaluating the costs of caring for a population, including inpatient and outpatient facility costs, physician care, medications, and other ancillary costs, such as lab tests and X-rays. HealthPartners has taken an additional step to make this information useful to providers by complementing the TCI with a total care resource use index (RUI). This approach isolates opportunities to improve price and resource use.
Clinics' and hospitals' TCI performance in the HealthPartners network is translated for consumers using a ranking of one to four dollar signs. One or two dollar signs mean performance is relatively better than the network average, and three to four dollar signs mean performance is relatively higher than the network average. These ratings, which are updated annually, are posted on HealthPartners.com so members can compare the overall cost of care at one clinic or hospital with another. Dollar rankings are always displayed with quality ratings of one to four stars. HealthPartners makes the information available in advance to providers and offers reports and consultations to support its improvement efforts.
For primary care, the TCI is calculated by dividing a provider's illness burden-adjusted total cost of care, per member per month (PMPM), by that of the peer group or network average. "We feel that TCI is what relates closest to PMPM premium costs," says McClure. "If we aren't able to show an impact on the total cost of care, we don't think we're credible to the market."
Specialty TCIs for cardiology, otolaryngology, obstetrics/gynecology, and orthopedics are based on a method using episode treatment groups, which pool together similar illnesses, such as chronic bronchitis.
Several factors are considered in the analysis:
McClure concedes that many individual physicians might not understand the TCI measure. "In a group practice setting, our physicians and administrators analyze performance at the system level. We don't just hand the data to the individual doctor and expect them to figure out what to do with it," she says. "We spend much more time at the macro level translating the data into high-leverage strategies that will make an impact."
One example of a macro-level project: HealthPartners recently introduced a radiology decision-support tool online and embedded in the group's electronic medical record. The tool "rates" high-tech diagnostic tests on its utility. If a physician orders a low-utility test, it offers evidence-based alternatives. The tool was developed by HealthPartners and then shared with the entire network. In its first full year of operation, the program reduced the number of unnecessary high-tech images by 7,000 and cut costs by $6.6 million over what would have been spent without the program.
As an organization, HealthPartners aims for a low-margin target, between 2 and 3 percent, says McClure. By keeping a low-margin target, the system has more control managing its fee schedule, which has a significant impact on containing the total cost of care, she adds, because unit price is a large driver of total cost.
HealthPartners' strategic roadmap, known as Partners for Better Health Goals 2014, reflects the Triple Aim and focuses on three areas: health quality, patient experience, and affordability.
These goals, which are set deliberately high, address the health of the community, not just patients and members. In addition, reducing disparities in health care is an organizational priority, and HealthPartners was able to decrease the gap in breast cancer screening rates between woman who are white and of color from 12.4 percent to 5.4 percent. HealthPartners also publicly reports clinical results that show how individual medical groups measure up on key care processes and outcomes.
To help ensure physician collaboration in achieving Triple Aim goals, HealthPartners uses a pay-for-performance approach.
For its employed medical group, HealthPartners uses the following compensation structure: About 85 percent of primary care physicians' compensation is based on production, while 15 percent is based on Triple Aim measures, such as metrics related to quality, patient experience, and total cost of care.
"We are also testing new models that will better support phone and e-care, as well as care coordination," says McClure.
HealthPartners also uses Triple Aim goals to create pay-for-performance programs with its contracted network of aligned-but not employed-physicians. In 2011, two-thirds of members receive care from a provider group with a Triple Aim agreement (including total cost of care). The model includes a target, with withholds and shared savings tied to total cost, quality, and experience goals.
Since the late 1990s, HealthPartners Medical Group has been multipayer, with the HealthPartners plan accounting for about 65 percent of revenue.
"Our goal is to have alignment among our various payer contracts," says Tricia Mason Dege, vice president, finance and planning. "We focus on measures that are used by Minnesota Community Measurement, our state's measurement collaborative among plans and medical groups."
Having alignment means that doctors and care teams can focus on key areas without needing to delve into the details of what different payers may focus on. Only a few administrators know exactly how much money might be tied to an initiative. "We do that intentionally to avoid confusion," says Mason Dege. "We really want providers to be focused on key measures, regardless of the dollars that are attached."
Mason Dege adds that the finance department has become a clearinghouse for knowledge on withholds and incentives that are available from payers. "That is becoming a bigger and bigger job, as payers are moving away from payment based on RVUs (relative value units) or some other form of straight, widget payment based on everything you do," she says.
Unlike a quality metric like optimal diabetes, the methodology for a measure like TCI is not the same for each payer. "We take on the role of understanding and validating that methodology," says Mason Dege. "If there are nuances that will make that easier or more difficult to hit, we can help the organization understand how that might be different from payer to payer."
When trying to align physicians with broader organization goals, McClure and Mason Dege offer this advice for other organizations:
Interviewed for this article:
Nancy McClure is senior vice president, HealthPartners Medical Group and Clinics, Bloomington, Minn. (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Tricia Mason Dege is vice president of finance and planning, HealthPartners, Bloomington, Minn. (email@example.com).
This article originated from a presentation by McClure and The Chartis Group, LLC, Chicago, at the American College of Healthcare Executives meeting in March 2011.
Publication Date: Monday, August 29, 2011
A leader from McKesson discusses how healthcare reform is forcing hospitals and health systems to take a different approach to capacity management and patient flow.
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
Emad Rizk, MD, president and CEO of Accretive Health, discusses the uncertainty facing hospitals and the transitions affecting revenue cycle management.
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Jim Bohnsack, vice president, solution & corporate development for Conifer Health Solutions, explains how the company helps healthcare providers leverage data to deliver better outcomes while optimizing reimbursement for all payment arrangements.
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
Steve Scibetta, senior director of channel sales for Ontario Systems' healthcare product line, shares insights into effectively managing receivables.
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Elena White, vice president of risk, quality, and network solutions for Optum, discusses how healthcare providers can leverage data and technology as they enable risk in their organization.
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Somnia President and CEO Marc Koch, MD, MBA, explains how hospitals can drive transformative change in the perioperative experience for outstanding clinical and financial outcomes.
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
PMMC President Roger L. Shaul discusses the effects of healthcare reform on revenue cycle management and how PMMC's products help clients adapt to a changing financial environment.
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Greg Burgess, Founder and Chief Product Officer at Burgess Group shares insights and opportunities for payment integrity in the rapidly changing healthcare IT landscape.
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
HFMA's print, email, online, and mobile opportunities provide you maximum reach and impact. We will work with you to build a plan that meets your needs. Contact a sales rep.
HFMA offers online, email, and print opportunities to help you recruit the most talented healthcare finance professionals. Place your classified ads today.
Drive down costs while improving quality in a reform environment.
Stay informed about new directions in healthcare finance. Share tools and strategies for improving performance. Be an active participant in your profession. Together, we’ll reshape the business and practice of healthcare. Join us.
Copyright 2016, Healthcare Financial Management Association.
Join HFMA today and enjoy: