Browse by Topic
Learn more about the healthcare finance industry's leading professional association. Find out why our members rely on HFMA as their go-to source for insight and information.
Members have many options for helping them advance their careers. Conferences, seminars, eLearning, certification, and more -- our education and events will keep you motivated.
Strategize for success with the nation's top performers at HFMA's Revenue Cycle Conference (MAP Event) from Sept. 25-27 in Phoenix, Arizona. Register now.
Learn about timely healthcare industry topics and earn CPEs with HFMA live and on-demand webinars. View the latest schedule.
Stay up-to-date in a rapidly changing industry in Fort Lauderdale (Nov.16-18) and Chicago (Dec. 12-14). Register early and save.
Our newsletters offer targeted articles with
technical how-to details and thought-provoking insights from healthcare finance
leaders and industry experts.
The Helen Yerger/L. Vann Seawell Best Article
Award recognizes articles for outstanding editorial achievement in hfm
Information about leading vendors helps your buying decisions.
Forum members can network during live webinars or access a library of past webinars on topics such as ICD-10 implementation, CMS audits, bundled payment, charity care, KPIs, and more.
An ever-expanding collection of spreadsheets, policies, job descriptions, checklists, and more that you can adopt and adapt.
Forum members can submit vexing questions to a panel of experts using our Ask the Expert service.
Your source for employment solutions.
Find new employment opportunities or
reach out to qualified candidates.
Distinguish yourself as a leader among your peers and advance your career by earning certification in our healthcare finance programs.
Get an objective third-party evaluation of products and services used in the healthcare finance workplace.
MAP App is a web-based application that helps organizations improve revenue cycle performance based on industry-standard metrics called MAP Keys.
Find suppliers and products in this comprehensive vendor directory for healthcare finance professionals.
Guidance for understanding and communicating about the price of health care.
Transformation toward value-based healthcare is reshaping the delivery of care, patient expectations, and payment structures.
Improve your revenue cycle performance through standard metrics, peer comparison, and successful practices.
When the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a Joint Signature Memorandum (JSM) to all Fiscal Intermediaries and Part A/B Medicare administrative contractors on May 2, 2008, the intent of the of JSM, which was titled, "Clarification of Medicare Bad Debt Policy Related to Accounts at a Collection Agency" was stated clearly to "…clarify longstanding policy concerning reimbursement for a Medicare bad debt while the account is at a collection agency." However, in practice, the JSM did little to clarify matters and provide objective guidance on the issue; instead it created confusion and controversy and spawned several lawsuits that have muddied the waters even further.
The concept behind Medicare's handling of bad debts is disengagingly simple: Tom Jendro, Assistant Professor at the University of Saint Francis and Senior Director of Finance for the Illinois Hospital Association, explains that typically Medicare beneficiaries have so-called Medicare supplemental insurance policies that cover their deductibles and co-pays under the program. Those that don't incur the expenses as out-of-pocket obligations.
The problems surface when Medicare beneficiaries lack a "gap" policy and are unable or unwilling to pay those expenses, which then languish on a hospital's books until they are deemed "uncollectible" and reported as such on the hospital's annual Medicare cost report. According to Jendro, as part of the annual audit of the cost report, the Medicare Fiscal Intermediary (FI) will perform a review of a sample of the bad debt amounts claimed by the hospital. At the end of the review of that sample, the FI will propose adjustments based on how well the sampled amounts met regulatory criteria. Adjustments disallowing some, all or none of the provider's filed" amounts may be proposed. Ultimately, 70% of the post-audit, Medicare bad debt amount will be reimbursed by the Medicare program to the hospital.
However, the scenario is rarely that straight forward and often questions arise about when a patient debt becomes a bad debt eligible for payment from Medicare. In particular, an area of contention surrounds what determines the status of a debt-that is, when it has been sent to an outside collection agency (OCA). Jendro adds that before implementation of the Medicare Prospective Payment System (PPS), the cost report was the basis for calculating a hospital's annual payments from the Medicare program. However, since the inception of PPS, bad debt write-offs represent one of the few remaining audit areas to have a financial impact. Consequently, that area of the report undergoes intense scrutiny by the auditors. (Note: Medicare reimbursement for critical access hospitals, (which, by law, are exempt from PPS), continues to be based on those hospitals' cost reports under Medicare's cost reimbursement principles.)
Christopher L. Crosswhite, a Health Law Partner in the Washington, D.C, office of Duane Morris, LLP, explains the history of the Bad Debt Moratorium that is intended to address this issue, in an article on the firm's website www.duanemorris.com called "The Medicare Bad Debt Moratorium: Still Alive and Kicking":
"In the late 1980s, Congress passed a series of provisions intended to protect health care providers from disallowances of Medicare bad debt reimbursement based on the imposition of new requirements on providers. These statutory provisions collectively became known as the Medicare Bad Debt Moratorium (the "Moratorium"). Among other things, the Moratorium prohibits the Medicare program from requiring a provider to change its bad debt policy where (1) the provider's intermediary had accepted that bad debt policy prior to August 1, 1987, and (2) the intermediary's acceptance was in accordance with existing rules and regulations."
He goes on to note that "through informal guidance issued to intermediaries, CMS has contended that the Moratorium does not apply in numerous situations, such as when a provider undergoes a change in ownership, with a new provider number, or a change in its intermediary. Another way that the Medicare program has tried to defeat application of the Moratorium is to assert that the provider changed its bad debt policy so that the previously accepted policy is no longer applicable. In its latest attack on the Moratorium, CMS issued a "joint signature memorandum" in May 2008, instructing Medicare contractors to disallow Medicare bad debts for patient accounts remaining at an outside collection agency even where the contractors may have allowed such bad debts in past audits based on the Moratorium.
"CMS claims that its longstanding policy required that accounts be returned to providers from outside collection agencies before the providers may claim the unpaid balances as bad debts. According to CMS' logic, any previous allowance of bad debt reimbursement for accounts remaining at collection agencies would not have been in accordance with the rules in existence as of August 1, 1987, meaning that the Moratorium's protection is inapplicable."
According to the May 2 JSM, "It has always been CMS's policy to require a patient account to be returned from an OCA, before the account can be claimed as a bad debt. The agency argues that if a provider is still pursuing collection efforts by virtue of their being kept at an OCA, it cannot also claim that the account is worthless and uncollectible.
Re-Charting the Waters
However, Crosswhite and Joanne Erde, a partner in the Miami, FL office of Duane Morris, note that this point of view represents a new CMS position on bad debts. In "History Rewritten: New Medicare Bad Debt Joint Signature Memorandum--CMS takes new position on old debts" for Dennis Barry's Reimbursement Advisor, they write that "CMS is not bothered in the least by the fact that the position laid out in the JSM is inconsistent with the agency's prior policy."
The authors point to a statement in the JSM: "We have determined that any instructions previously issued which allowed hospitals to claim Medicare bad debts for accounts at a collection agency based on a Medicare contractor's interpretation of the policy as of August 1, 1987, are incorrect." According to Erde and Crosswhite, "the significance of this JSM is not in the analysis and discussion of CMS's position that bad debts may not be claimed on a cost report until the relevant patient accounts are returned from the OCA. Rather, its significance lies in the new position that CMS is taking regarding the application of the moratorium to these bad debts."
Erde also points out that it's a very complicated area because historically the intermediaries have not behaved consistently. She adds that although there have been a few new legal cases lately, it hasn't changed the situation significantly."
Surviving the Audit
Crosswhite writes that "based on CMS' directives, Medicare contractors are increasingly disallowing providers' bad debt claims that in prior cost report audits would have been allowed." Jendro adds that the scope of the audit that is conducted by the FIs at the end of the year may depend on how much a hospital is claiming as bad debt. "If it's an unusually large amount,(dollars or volume) either for the hospital historically or compared to other providers the FI may insist on a larger sample of accounts to be reviewed. For hospitals with a comparatively small number of accounts or dollar amount, the FI could perform a 100% review.
Given these considerations, a provider may decide to sidestep the anticipated negative adjustments and recall their Medicare bad debts from outside collection agencies before the audit. Crosswhite warns that this may not be the best course of action. He writes that "providers faced with potential disallowances of Medicare bad debts may feel that they have little choice but to consider changes in their arrangements and practices involving outside collection agencies in an attempt to comply with current Medicare policy… before doing so, however, the provider must take into account that it will likely have to recall all patient accounts from the collection agencies (or at least the accounts with comparable balances and collection experience), not just the Medicare accounts. Otherwise, the Medicare contractor may next claim that the Medicare bad debts are not allowable because the provider engaged in dissimilar collection efforts for Medicare and non-Medicare accounts."
Erde notes that the issue at play here is having to recall both Medicare and Non-Medicare debts from outside collection agencies to demonstrate that the two types of accounts are being treated equitably by the provider. "Hospitals are trying to develop policies that are consistent with CMS rules, but they have to make sure that they are treating both Medicare and Non-Medicare accounts uniformly."
Impact of Court Cases
Erde adds that a significant impediment to clarity on this issue is that CMS has been changing the rules Erde and Crosswhite, writing in "D.C. District Court Decision Gives New Life to Medicare Bad Debt Moratorium," in Reimbursement Advisor in August 2008, point out that "in a decision with potentially far-reaching implications, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia-in Foothill Hospital-Morris L. Johnston Memorial v. Leavitt-held that CMS's policy disallowing Medicare bad debt for accounts remaining at collection agencies violates the statutory Medicare bad debt moratorium."
Crosswhite sums it up by saying that "Despite CMS's attempts to consign the Moratorium to ancient reimbursement history, the Moratorium remains in effect and may serve as a potent weapon for providers considering whether they may be able to challenge bad debt disallowances." Erde, in a letter to the editor to HFMA, adds that "as of this writing, events are still in flux. The JSM is still out there and intermediaries are going to be advising providers that the Moratorium will not protect them from disallowances of bad debt for accounts at collection agencies. Yet the handwriting may be on the wall." (Side-Bar 1)
Medicare Policy on Bad Debts
According to Chapter 3 of the Provider Reimbursement Manual (PRM), CMS Publication 15-1, and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 42, Section 413.80, a Medicare bad debt must meet the following minimum requirements:
The bad debt must be related to Medicare covered services for coinsurance and deductible amounts. Bad debts relating to noncovered services or to physician charges are non-reimbursable bad debts.
Documentation must clearly indicate that a reasonable collection effort was made. Documentation of the collection effort should include copies of letters, follow-up letters, reports of telephone and personal contacts, etc. The collection effort must be "genuine", rather than a token effort. Your facility's collection effort for Medicare deductible and coinsurance amounts should be similar to the effort made for the collection of amounts from non-Medicare patients. If your facility refers non-Medicare claims to a collection agency, all Medicare claims should also be referred to a collection agency. (This collection effort is not required if the beneficiary is indigent - see item 4 below.)
The bad debt must actually be uncollectible when claimed as worthless. According to PRM, Part I, Section 310.2, a bill is presumed to be uncollectible if a reasonable effort was made to collect the bill and the bill remains unpaid for more than 120 days from the date the first bill was mailed to the beneficiary.
A Medicare bad debt can only be written off prior to the 120 days from the date of the first patient bill if the patient has been determined to meet the requirement of indigence. Patient files should contain documentation of the method by which indigence was determined in addition to all information supporting the determination. PRM Part I, Section 312 states the following regarding indigency : "Providers can deem Medicare beneficiaries indigent or medically indigent when such individuals have also been determined eligible for Medicaid as either categorically needy individuals or medically needy individuals, respectively." If the patient is on Medicaid, then Medicaid eligibility documentation should be maintained in the file, including the date of the Remittance Advice from the Medicaid fiscal intermediary processing the claim.
The uncollectible amount must be charged off as a bad debt in the accounting period in which the account is deemed to be worthless. If your facility recovers an amount that was previously written off and claimed as a Medicare bad debt, your current year's bad debts should be reduced by the amount recovered.
When filing your Medicare cost report, you are required to complete a CMS-339 questionnaire. The questionnaire indicates that if bad debts are claimed on the cost report, a supporting schedule must contain the following:
More on Medicare Bad Debt Audits...
Note: "Column 4 - Indigency/Welfare Recipient.--If the patient included in column 1 has been deemed indigent, place a check in this column.
If the patient in column 1 has a valid Medicaid number, also include this number in this column. See the criteria in Provider From, Reimbursement Manual - I, §§312 and 322 and 42 CFR 413.80 for guidance on the billing requirements for indigent and welfare recipients, page 9 at: www.cms.hhs.gov/transmittals/downloads/R6P211.pdf
CMS-339 questionnaire can be found at: www.cms.hhs.gov/cmsforms/downloads/cms339.pdf
Publication Date: Thursday, January 08, 2009
In this Business Profile, Bruce Haupt, president and CEO of ClearBalance, discusses how a patient loan program can increase patient collections, reduce bad debt, and speed cash flow.
In this Business Profile, Jerry Bruno, principal with Deloitte Consulting LLP, discusses the importance of choosing revenue cycle solutions that help an organization meet the challenges of a quickly evolving healthcare environment.
In this business profile, Lane Jackson, a partner in the Grant Thornton LLP Health Care Advisory Services practice, with extensive experience in overseeing system implementations and revenue cycle reorganizations, discusses best practices for elevating revenue cycle performance during an EMR implementation. Grant Thornton LLP is a sponsor of the Large System Controllers Council Affinity Group.
In this business profile, Amy Gross, senior vice president of Key Government Finance, discusses the benefits of private placement transactions to support large-scale financing projects.
In this business profile, Doug Polasky, executive vice president at Xtend Healthcare, explains the importance of having sound workflow processes in a consolidated business office to ensure optimal performance and reduce costs.
In this business profile, sponsored by SSI, Jay Colfer, vice president of sales and marketing, shares how patient access solutions are reversing the trend toward increased bad debt resulting from the rise in high-deductible consumer health plans.
In this business profile of Deloitte Consulting, Matthew Hitch and David Betts explore the potential benefits of elevating the customer experience and outline strategies to change service delivery.
TriMedx helps health systems control costs and uncover savings opportunities by optimizing the clinical engineering function.
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Drive down costs while improving quality in a reform environment.
Receive expert insights and how-to action to achieve and maintain peak revenue cycle performance.
Access expert insights on financial forecasting/planning, strategic partnerships, capital allocation, and more.
Stay informed about new directions in healthcare finance. Share tools and strategies for improving performance. Be an active participant in your profession. Together, we’ll reshape the business and practice of healthcare. Join us.
Copyright 2016, Healthcare Financial Management Association.
Join HFMA today and enjoy: