Browse by Topic
More than 40,000 members value HFMA's thought leadership and practical strategies. HFMA is where you need to be.
Get acquainted with the
healthcare finance industry's leading professional association. Find out why our
members rely on HFMA as their go-to source for insight and
Members have many
options for helping them advance their careers. Conferences, seminars,
eLearning, certification, and more -- our education and events will keep you
Connect the dots on today's big issues, explore collaborations, get career-boosting tips, and network with colleagues nationwide at the leading finance conference. Save $100 off the full conference rate when you register by May 8.
Real-time presentations with nationally recognized experts, networking opportunities, and industry solutions—no travel required!
Get the latest, practical education in key areas of healthcare finance over 1, 2, or 3 days. Choose Essentials Programs or Master Sessions in DC or Seattle. Register early and save $100.
If you're a subscriber to any of our three newsletters, you have access to online education. Learn more or subscribe.
Get the perspectives of leading healthcare finance professionals on today's hottest issues.
Information about leading vendors helps your buying decisions.
Forum members can network during live webinars or access a library of past webinars on topics such as bundled payment, charity care, and ICD-10.
An ever-expanding collection of spreadsheets, policies, job
descriptions, checklists, and more that you can adopt and adapt.
Forum members can submit vexing questions to a panel of experts
using our Ask the Expert service.
Your source for employment solutions.
Find new employment opportunities or
reach out to qualified candidates.
Distinguish yourself as a
leader among your peers and advance your career by earning certification in our
healthcare finance programs.
Get an objective third-party evaluation of products and services used in the healthcare finance workplace.
MAP App is a web-based application that helps organizations improve revenue cycle performance based on industry-standard metrics called MAP Keys.
Find suppliers and products in this comprehensive vendor directory for healthcare finance professionals.
Guidance for understanding and communicating about the price of health care.
Guidelines on how to make it easier for consumers to get information about healthcare prices.
Improve your revenue cycle performance through standard metrics, peer comparison, and successful practices.
By Christine Fontaine
Denials have been endlessly discussed among revenue cycle leaders and continue to be a cause of revenue leakage for healthcare organizations. Industry statistics indicate that providers write off 3 percent to 5 percent of net revenue to denials. High-performing revenue cycle teams realize that they cannot continue to "manage" denials but must change processes throughout their organizations to prevent denials from occurring.
In 2009, Shore Health System, a two-hospital system in Maryland, had a denial rate of 1.2 percent-well below the current industry benchmark of 2 percent. Yet we were able to reduce that rate to 0.5 percent over the course of a year by digging into the causes of our denials and implementing process changes to prevent future denials.
This is a sample article from HFMA's Revenue Cycle Forum, a subscription-based discussion community that encourages networking and discussion among revenue cycle leaders.
Learn more and join the Revenue Cycle Forum
Before you can tackle your denials problem, you need to be able to clearly and accurately define what your initial and final denial write-off rates are, and categorize your denials by types. With more than 250 American National Standards Institute remittance codes and manually posted payments-not to mention a lack of standardization-providers must roll up denials into specific categories, such as "no authorization," "no medical necessity," and "timely filing." Providers can then intelligently workflow these denials to the right person and aggregate patterns or trends across the revenue cycle.
If you don't have defensible data, then you won't be able to change processes. For example, when I was the director of revenue cycle operations at Shore Health System, the lab was a big part of our denials. The lab staff asked me how much we were losing in denials, and all I could say was "a lot" because I didn't have specific data to point to. As you can imagine, that approach got me nowhere. Due to the high volume/low dollars in our lab area, we had not invested in the resources or technology that would allow us to communicate with the lab about each denied account-so those dollars continued to be lost.
However, when we deployed denial analytics technology that clearly showed how much we were losing in denials due to lab and other issues, it allowed us to easily refer denied accounts to the lab to resolve. We then were able to work with the lab to put processes into place that would prevent those denials in the first place.
For example, some physicians were ordering a T4 and a TSH at the same time, but these could not be reimbursed because one could only be ordered based on the results of the other. Once we identified the root cause, quantified the dollars, and identified the physicians primarily ordering these tests, education and outreach resulted in this denial being reduced by more than 75 percent.
When working with specific departments or individuals to reduce denials, you need to ensure that you are reporting the actual loss, not the total dollars billed. So it is important that you have the 835 data and host transactions and adjustment codes. If you do not, someone can poke holes in the information you give them, and you will lose credibility and erode your ability to impact change throughout your organization.
Effective denial prevention requires a committed team approach that is enterprisewide, including the clinical areas. At Shore Health, we had a denial prevention team that evolved over time. Once our approach became more granular-and aimed at root cause analysis-we became the "Revenue Defense Team." The team-which included representatives from patient accounting, case management, medical records, coding, contracting, compliance, and patient access-set a hospitalwide goal of "zero tolerance" for revenue leakage.
The team's primary responsibilities were to review all first-pass rejections, denials, and final denial write-offs, as well as to identify the process improvement initiative that was deployed to reduce the rework, inefficiencies, and lost revenue to the organization.
When developing a Revenue Defense Team, you need to have adequate resources and follow a systematic approach. A program plan, or charter, should be established. This should define the purpose of the project, how it will be structured, and how it will be measured for success. The plan should also include the team's vision, objectives, scope, and deliverables, as well as the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.
This is not a one-time, isolated initiative; this is a long-term commitment and an ongoing process that combines departmental efforts and tracks success against key performance indicators (KPIs). (For examples of revenue cycle KPIs, see the key indicators identified by HFMA's MAP project.)
Industry statistics indicate that 10 percent of denials are not preventable, but couldn't we say that all denials are preventable if we really dig into the true root cause and ensure they don't happen again?
Trending the reasons for denials and digging into the root causes are critical to your denial prevention efforts. A root cause analysis should be performed for all denials and categories to avoid erroneous assumptions about contributing factors of individual denials.
The coded reason on a remittance advice does not help providers identify the true cause of a denial-it is too generic and used inconsistently. For example, if you receive a denial for "no authorization," do you immediately presume that an authorization was not obtained and that there is a problem with your financial clearance process? I have made this assumption in the past. However, on reviewing such a denial at Shore Health, we identified that we did obtain authorization, but on the day of service, radiology either changed the original order or "added on" a test. Once we were able to identify the true root cause and quantify it into dollars lost, we worked with radiology to ensure that our financial clearance team is now notified when orders are changed. We can then modify the authorizations that day, resulting in limited denials moving forward.
When reviewing denials, you also need to have an action plan that quantifies the dollars lost, the root cause, and the results once process changes are made. It doesn't have to be complicated, but it must track your results and your recoveries so you can celebrate your successes and continue with your process improvement approach.
All denials require a similar level of scrutiny, and providers must be able to report these by location, physician, category, type, root cause, recommended resolution, and outcomes of your efforts.
By following these practices, our Revenue Defense Team at Shore Health System decreased first-pass denials by more than 70 percent, reduced the denial rate from 1.2 percent to 0.5 percent, and saved just under $1 million.
Many providers believe that denials are just part of the status quo-but they don't have to be. Denials can be prevented by using technology that can automate workflow and provide robust analytics, establishing a collaborative team approach to reduce denial rates, and determining the true root cause to improve processes.
Christine Fontaine, CHFP, CPAM, is vice president, revenue cycle solutions, OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, Minn., the former director of revenue cycle operations, Shore Health System, Easton, Md., and a member of HFMA's Maryland Chapter (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Forum members: Please add your questions or comments about this article-in the comment section below, or via the Revenue Cycle Forum LinkedIn discussion board.
Or perhaps you have another discussion starter?
Publication Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011
Russ Graney, founder and CEO for Aidin, and John Laursen, head of business development for Aidin, share insights on how to improve care transitions between acute and post-acute care settings and incentivize high-quality patient outcomes.
Scott Elston, strategic accounts manager, GE Healthcare Services, describes how substantial cost reduction in health care requires rethinking business strategy and asset use.
Robert Williams, MD, director, Deloitte Consulting LLP, and Arielle Freiberger, product strategist, ConvergeHEALTH by Deloitte, explain how sophisticated retrospective, real-time, and predictive data analytics can inform decision making to reduce costs and improve care.
Stuart Hanson, director of business development (healthcare solutions) at Citi Retail Services, discusses how improving the payment experience can benefit consumers and healthcare providers.
Scott Schmidt, vice president, Cerner RevWorks, LLC, shares insights on best practices for maximizing a revenue cycle management partnership.
HFMA's print, email, online, and mobile opportunities provide you maximum reach and impact. We will work with you to build a plan that meets your needs. Contact a sales rep.
HFMA offers online, email, and print opportunities to help you recruit the most talented healthcare finance professionals. Place your classified ads today.
Drive down costs while improving quality in a reform environment.
Stay informed about new directions in healthcare finance. Share tools and strategies for improving performance. Be an active participant in your profession. Together, we’ll reshape the business and practice of healthcare. Join us.
©2015 Copyright Healthcare Financial Management Association
HFMA.org is best viewed using IE9 or the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, and Safari.
Join HFMA today and enjoy: