Clinic Volumes Increase with Shared Decision Making Program
Shared decision making is not a new idea. But it is
receiving renewed attention as a health reform strategy—with
potential to reduce overall U.S. healthcare spending. Some
providers are also finding that shared decision making can help
increase patient loyalty.
In shared decision making, nurses, physicians,
and other staff provide the patient with
balanced information about treatment options and
incorporate the patient's preferences and values
into the medical plan, according to the
Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making
(FIMDM).
Preliminary data suggest that informed patients
tend to make more conservative treatment
decisions. For example, a 2007 study found that
shared decision making improved patient
knowledge and increased watchful waiting as a
treatment option in men diagnosed with prostate
cancer.
The ROI for providers that offer such programs
include a potential increase in patient loyalty,
which may translate into higher volumes. For
example, Stillwater Medical Group increased
patient loyalty among breast cancer patients by
almost 20 percent.
All patients with a prostate cancer or breast
cancer diagnosis at the large multispecialty
practice receive coordinated support that helps
them make treatment decisions. Before their
initial consultation with a specialist, breast
and prostate cancer patients meet with Joyce
Kramer, RN, BA, BCC, a clinical care coordinator
at the Stillwater, Minn. Clinic.
“My role is to assess their knowledge of the
disease, review their treatment options, and
help them coordinate their treatment after
biopsy and navigate the system,” says Kramer,
who was hired initially to work with breast
cancer patients to help increase their loyalty
to this large group practice that provides
primary and subspecialty care.
Patients are given a DVD/booklet and additional
information to review before their treatment
planning session with the specialist. Kramer
documents patients’ concerns in the medical
record so that the specialist can review the
information during the patient consult.
Currently, the services that Kramer provides are
not billable. However, the clinic is seeing
improved revenue through better patient
retention. From 2007 to 2008, the clinic
improved its retention of breast cancer patients
from 70 percent to 91 percent. In addition,
patient volumes increased by 10 percent over
that time period. “The value of a nurse
providing this service is very high, just in
terms of keeping patients in the system,” she
says.
Stillwater Medical Group is now starting to use
shared decision making with primary care
patients who have benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
through a demonstration project funded by the
Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making
Following the same process as with prostate
cancer and breast cancer patients, men with BPH
will meet with a nurse care coordinator to
review videos and complete questionnaires before
they return to their primary care physician to
discuss their treatment options.
When starting with the BPH population,
Stillwater focused on the primary care providers
with the highest volumes in this population. “We
found that there wasn’t a lot of consensus among
providers on when to send patients with BPH to
the urologist,” says Kramer says. “Our plan is
to meet with patients after their initial
diagnosis of BPH and before referral to a
urologist. That’s actually good for urologists,
who will see the more complex cases that require
invasive treatments.”
The approach also allows primary care physicians
to continue caring for those patients who choose
less invasive treatments, such as watchful
waiting or medications.
In the coming months, the Stillwater Medical
Group plans to coordinate decision-making
resources for patients with diabetes and back
pain.
Interviewed for this case study: Joyce Kramer,
RN, BA, BCC, is clinical care coordinator at
Stillwater Medical Group, part of Lakeview
Health
(jkramer@lakeview.org).
This case study is excerpted from a series of
articles on “Helping Patients Make Appropriate
Medical Decisions” in the Fall 2009 issue of
The Business of Caring, a free electronic
resource.
Read the entire article series.
