Creating the Burning Platform for Change
Forward-thinking healthcare leaders are not
waiting for legislation to dictate how to
transform health care. They have a vision of the
future—and they are already headed toward it.
There are many ways for healthcare organizations
to move toward higher quality and greater
coordination and efficiency in patient care. But
all paths start from the same point: a
leadership team that effectively identifies and
communicates the need to radically restructure
the way in which healthcare services are
delivered.
That transformation requires leaders to bring
all constituencies—the governing board,
physicians, clinical managers, employees,
vendors, patients, and the community at large—on
board with a new vision for the organization.
Finding the Right Platform
Setting an example in proactive leadership,
executives at Michigan-based Trinity Health
launched a major technology investment and
change initiative nine years ago. When they
foresaw the current financial crisis—in trends
such as sharply reduced patient volumes and
rising bad debt—they moved quickly to build on
their earlier preparations. By the time the
stock market collapsed in September 2008,
Trinity Health president and CEO Joseph R.
Swedish was ready to launch a series of
initiatives to fundamentally reinvent the
system’s business, which includes 45 hospitals
and 379 ambulatory facilities in seven states.
“To take the organization to the next level, it
was necessary to more aggressively unify and
standardize our processes of care delivery,
service, and support so as to reduce variation
and accelerate gains,” says Swedish.
The program, called “Sustaining the Ministry,”
started with immediate steps, including capital
spending reductions, to offset a multimillion
dollar budget gap resulting from the
unprecedented challenges of the recession.
Beyond that, however, the program is guiding
Trinity Health as it redefines the model of
care. “This is really our effort to accelerate
change in the organization,” says Kedrick D.
Adkins, president of integrated services at the
not-for-profit Catholic health system.
By “change,” Adkins means a radical departure.
Trinity Health aims to transform itself from a
traditional, hospital-centric organization that
focuses primarily on acute care to a care
delivery organization that delivers the full
spectrum of care—ambulatory care, critical care,
chronic disease care, long-term care, home care,
retail-oriented care—in a coordinated, efficient
manner.
The vision reflects a healthcare ideal in which
providers work together across care sites to
deliver the highest-quality care in the most
appropriate setting and in the most efficient
manner.
The vision also makes good business sense as
hospital-centric organizations watch inpatient
volumes decline and outpatient numbers rise.
Revenue from ambulatory care and physician
practices now represent almost 50 percent of
Trinity Health’s business.
Fortuitously, Trinity Health’s $400 million
investment nine years ago has proved crucial
toward achieving the system’s new vision. The
majority of the dollars went toward building an
electronic health record (EHR), complete with
computerized physician order entry, which is now
up and running at 22 system hospitals.
Physicians can now access medical records and
place orders from the hospital, their homes,
their offices, or anywhere. Nurses are spending
8 percent more time with patients, as opposed to
documenting in paper records. Most important,
patient safety has improved: Computer-generated
alerts flag about 14,000 potential adverse drug
events each year.
The EHR rollout coincided with a clinical
improvement effort aimed at adopting
evidence-based care protocols. Long before the
federal government passed legislation on
comparative effectiveness research, Trinity
Health physicians were weighing the benefits and
costs of various treatment approaches. Today,
the health system has 172 standard order sets in
place and more than 2,500 standard drugs in the
formulary.
Patients receive the greatest benefit from
standardized, evidenced-based care: Trinity
Health saw a 21 percent reduction in
severity-adjusted mortality (or 2,612 fewer
deaths) in 2007. Also, the health system
performs better than the national average on 97
percent of core clinical indicators.
“As the government and private payers move
toward payment that rewards outcomes and care
coordination rather than volume, Trinity Health
can leverage a full array of EHR and clinical
support tools to align with physicians and
create better, more efficient systems of care,”
says Terry O’Rourke, MD, chief clinical officer.
Despite how far Trinity Health has come, it
still has a lot of work to do before it can call
itself a “care delivery organization.” Most of
the progress to date has been done on the
inpatient side. Now the health system is
extending its EHR and clinical improvement
efforts to ambulatory clinics and outpatient
services. The work includes implementing
standard EHRs and related technologies for more
than 1,000 employed physicians.
“EHR capabilities already support care delivery
in our hospital-based outpatient service
settings, and we are in the process of
finalizing a strategy and approach for
ambulatory clinics,” said CIO Paul Browne.
“These will be areas of intense focus for the
next several years.”
Trinity Health is also reaching out to
physicians to gain their support and cooperation
in improving quality and efficiency across care
sites. The health system is studying various
alignment models, including physician employment
and clinical service line comanagement
agreements.
Communicating the Vision
Seattle-based Virginia Mason Medical Center’s
view of the future can be summed up in the
organization’s motivational vision: “To be the
Quality Leader and transform health care.”
Virginia Mason leaders seek to have zero defects
in the quality and safety of care delivered to
patients, and they intend to lead all healthcare
providers to share their vision.
To move toward this goal, Virginia Mason—a
336-bed hospital and a network of clinics across
western Washington—uses the Virginia Mason
Production System, which is adapted from the
famed Toyota Production System. Virginia Mason
seeks continuous improvement to eliminate
defects and waste. The idea is that, by creating
processes that eradicate rework and
inefficiency, the health system frees up staff
time and financial resources to focus on
patients.
To date, the positive effects on quality and
costs are inspirational. Here are a few
examples: Patient falls have decreased from 3.42
per 1,000 patient days to 2.92 falls in a single
year. Inventory costs have decreased by more
than $1 million through the use of supply
standardization. The amount of time it takes
patients to receive lab results has been reduced
by more than 85 percent. Plus, the health system
has saved $11 million in planned capital
investment by using space more efficiently.
Having undertaken more than 660 continuous
improvement activities in the past seven years,
Virginia Mason staff members know the system’s
vision and strategy for achieving it. “We have a
very well developed strategic plan that all
5,000 of our employees could explain to you,”
says Suzanne Anderson, senior vice president,
CFO, and CIO. “Having everyone understand what
we are aiming for and having the Virginia Mason
Production System as our tool to get there is
what allows us to achieve the results that we
are aiming for.”
A triangle graphic is used to reinforce the
health system’s strategic plan at every turn
(see the exhibit). The graphic
spells out Virginia Mason’s vision, mission,
values, key strategies, and foundational
elements.
“As we do our work, we start meetings with this
graphic so people understand that whatever we
are working on at that moment ties to our
strategic plan and what we are trying to
accomplish,” says Anderson.
For example, a current initiative aimed at
improving the discharge process in the emergency
department (ED) addresses Virginia Mason’s
“service” strategy, which seeks to “create an
extra-ordinary patient experience.” The
initiative also ties into one of the plan’s
foundational elements—strong economics—since a
more efficient discharge process would help
increase patient throughout. Further, it ties to
the “people” component of the strategic plan
because a less crowded ED reduces the
frustration that staff members experience when
they work in a harried ED.
“Elements of this initiative tie into each one
of the pieces of our strategic plan,” says
Anderson. “If you have staff people involved in
the work, it is important for them to understand
the bigger picture.”
Catching the Momentum
The leaders of Trinity Health see the current
healthcare landscape in historic terms—and they
are using this momentum to stoke a
transformative change process.
“We say our business model is experiencing a
tectonic shift,” says Adkins, pointing out that
delivering hospital-centric health care is no
longer sufficient to fulfill Trinity Health’s
mission. “We have to realign our business,
change many of our processes, and reposition
ourselves to reflect how we see healthcare
transformation.”
But it’s also important to get it right, says
Andrea Walsh, executive vice president of
HealthPartners, the integrated healthcare system
in Minneapolis. One of the biggest leadership
challenges in health care is balancing the need
for urgent change with a well thought-out
strategy. “We need to figure out that right
balance of taking the time to do it right with
the recognition that we do not have a lot of
time.”
Managing Change
There is no one-size-fits-all formula for
managing change. Below are some key points.
Determine the context for change. This step
requires information gathering and analysis.
What is the imperative for change? Who are all
the groups that need to be involved? What are
the potential impediments to change?
Build support for change. Early in the change
process, core believers need to involve a larger
group of “initial participators” who will
participate in the initiative out of loyalty to
the organization.
Develop a motivating vision. Such a vision
enables people to imagine new possibilities for
the organization and for themselves as members
of the organization.
Articulate clear, specific, and realistic goals
and strategies. Specific goals and strategies
guide people as they undertake the steps
necessary to make the vision a reality.
Communicate. Use all available methods of
communication to get across the need for change,
the vision, and the change process.
Identify barriers to change and develop
strategies to overcome them. Problems that are
ignored and allowed to fester can breed
resentment, distrust, and uncertainty.
Look for the early win. By making the most out
of small, early successes, managers can
establish the credibility of the change
initiative.
Recognize participants for their efforts.
Possible rewards include promotions, bonuses,
praise, and notes of recognition.
Source: Adapted from Organizational Change: Primer, Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development, 2000. For the full report, visit www.hsrd.research.va.gov/publications/primer/
