Get the E-newsletter
Only 10 years ago, the concept of collecting data and measuring a patient's experience with a healthcare provider had barely taken root. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality had just completed three years of work and a handful of pilot studies in preparation for releasing the HCAHPS survey, the first national, standardized, publicly reported survey of patients' perspectives of the care they received while in the hospital. CMS adopted the survey in October 2006 and began publicly reporting HCAHPS scores in March 2008.
Starting in 2007, CMS required hospitals subject to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) to collect and submit HCAHPS data to receive their full annual payment update. In 2013, the agency began incorporating HCAHPS scores into Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) payment calculations.
One of four domains used to determine a hospital's total performance score under VBP, patient experience accounts for 30 percent of the score in FY15 and 25 percent in FY16. Depending on the size of the health system and its mix of Medicare patients, falling short on HCAHPS scores can have a significant effect on a hospital's bottom line.
Beyond Medicare payments, industry experts note an even greater incentive to improve the patient experience—as a key differentiator to help hospitals attract and retain patients in an increasingly competitive healthcare environment.
Thomas Lee, MD, chief medical officer, Press Ganey
In the past 50 years, advances in health care and diagnostics have dramatically improved outcomes for patients in a number of disease states. But these advances have also increased specialization in a way that has slowly shifted the focus from the patient to the technology and methods that will cure the patient.
"If you go back a hundred years to the time of William Osler, what it meant to be an excellent physician was to stay by the patient's bedside and really pay attention to them to help them understand what was going to happen and then relieve their suffering," says Thomas Lee, MD, chief medical officer for healthcare strategic advisory firm Press Ganey.
"Then, in the second half of the 20th century, science advanced. We could do bypass surgery, we could treat and cure some cancers. But we focus on doing the things that we can do, even if sometimes they don't change the big picture for patients. By doing those things, it is very easy to get completely focused on the narrow and lose track of the big picture."
Yet making the shift back to patient-focused care is not intuitive. According to Carol Majewski, RN, director of the office of patient experience at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H., clinicians often relate to their own experience as a patient. "But I'm a very atypical patient: I know the system and can be more forgiving of the system than a patient would," Majewski notes. "I think one of the major things many of us have done is believe we knew what patients wanted rather than asking patients what they wanted."
At Twin Rivers Regional Medical Center, changing from a single-minded focus on outcomes to also providing a good patient experience started in 2012. The effort at the small, 116-bed rural hospital in the "boot heel" of Missouri is led by Steven Pu, DO, chief medical officer (CMO). Pu's major influences in this endeavor have been his experience with a healthcare system during his wife's illness and a presentation he saw in 2011 by patient experience advocate Bridget Duffy, MD, currently the CMO of healthcare technology company Vocera.
"What resonated with me is she said it needs to be about humanizing the patient experience, reestablishing a more collaborative relationship between physicians and nurses, restoring spirituality as part of the care plan, and actually have the physicians lead the journey," Pu says. This squared with Pu's own experience during his wife's illness, where he observed care being delivered in what he considered the "right" way.
"It opened my eyes to the fact that I think we are missing the boat on how we deliver care," he says. "You could do all the tasks you want, but from the perspective of patients and their families, what they want is empathy. They want people to care for them. You still have to focus on quality and safety and how that ties in and impacts care, but patient experience drives everything."
At Twin Rivers, the centerpiece of providing a caring and compassionate patient experience is called the Sacred Moment, a concept developed by the medical center's chief of staff and the staff orthopedic surgeon. This encounter, shortly after admission, allows a physician or nurse to focus solely on the patient to gauge the patient's fears and concerns about being in the hospital. Even though it may last only 10 minutes, the Sacred Moment serves as a way to slow things down and put the patient back at the center of care.
While the benefit to the patient has been significant—as Twin Rivers' continued year-over-year improvement in patient experience scores attests—it also has manifested in employees. "Once we had employees starting to do that, they realized they were getting as much out of it as the patient, because they were getting to sit down at the bedside with the patient and actually care for somebody again," Pu says.
Providing a good patient experience also entails simply getting to know patients on a more personal level, finding out what is important to them and how the care they are receiving relates to their values and priorities. According to Majewski, this information can help health systems tailor care to individual patients.
"It should affect the conversations we are having with patients," she says. "So if your passion is downhill skiing and now you are in Hitchcock having a knee replacement, we don't just say you need to get out of bed and walk so many feet, but instead relate it to your goal to be back out on the ski slopes this winter. So everything we are working with you on is about getting you back to the things that are important to you."
Creating programs to improve the patient experience represents a significant change in the culture of how care is delivered. With health care transforming so rapidly, this change might be seen as yet another in a long line, and it is one that could be difficult for staff to embrace. Majewski acknowledges that referring to her work as "culture change" can be intimidating to staff who are worn down by changes in care delivery or are generally resistant to change. Instead, she refers to it as "culture acceleration."
That said, employee buy-in and empowerment are important factors in making the organizational changes needed to improve the patient experience. At Twin Rivers, that approach entailed finding not only staff who would be open to the change, but those who could lead the effort. "From my perspective, this needed to be physician led," Pu says. "They needed to be involved at the very outset."
Pu introduced his ideas to a limited audience, the hospital's physician leadership, to warm them up to the concept. But even this phase, he realized, would require a little nuance. "If you go to physicians and tell them it is about patient satisfaction, they are going to think it's all fluff, so my initial conversations with them were about quality," Pu says. "Everybody understands quality as far as the metrics there, so you talk about quality. You can make that case."
With the conversation opened, Pu acted to get physicians what he termed some "quick wins" that represented improvements in their work and patient outcomes. After hearing that physicians and nurses had concerns about care quality, Pu collected four or five ideas for improvements the physicians wanted to see implemented. He then made the business case to executive leadership as to why the changes were good for patients and good for the hospital. "We got some resources and made some changes that some didn't think we could get, because we made the business case for them," he said. "Once that happened, all of sudden, the physicians were engaged."
To take the effort to the next level, Pu sought to develop a collaborative relationship among the physicians, nurses, and the rest of the hospital staff. The key elements were a focus on communicating to staff the physicians' appreciation for all the work they did to make hospital operations run smoothly, and that the physicians were open to hearing their concerns and acting on them.
To kick off this next phase, Twin Rivers held employee "town meetings" in which employees could voice their ideas and concerns. To get the employees to open up, Pu stood up at the first meeting to run the discussion and asked all the hospital administrators to leave. What followed was "an hour and a half of people bleeding their hearts out about not being able to come to work and feel like they have actually done their job, and that was tragic," he says. As with the physicians' concerns, hospital administration quickly approved a short list of changes designed to help the nurses and other staff—again, after hearing a strong business case.
This early work highlights a cornerstone of the Twin Rivers program to improve the patient experience. "You can't improve patient experience in your facility if you don't focus on employee satisfaction as well," Pu says.
Carol Majewski, RN, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
As health care becomes increasingly digital and data driven, collecting and crunching patient experience data is at the center of many improvement efforts. While HCAHPS scores can provide a broad snapshot of a hospital's performance, many turn to outside vendors to take a deeper dive and provide statistically significant patient data tied directly to individual physicians and other care providers.
Joan Becker, RN, patient experience partner at Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, says the health system began using data differently soon after her current boss, Sean Rodriguez, chief experience officer, came aboard in 2011. "Before then we didn't have a lot of access to our patient experience data," Becker says. "Sean really took the bull by the horns and made sure our sample size was big enough, and he went out and showed everyone data that they may not have even known existed."
In conjunction with a program that requires nurses to make hourly rounds and provide bedside shift reports, the health system has tried to bolster the amount of patient experience data it collects to ensure the data are statistically relevant. It then makes all the data available to the staff to help drive improvement. Becker says this change "woke managers up" to the idea that they were responsible for improving patient satisfaction and that patient experience was a priority at Barnes-Jewish.
At Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Majewski says, patient experience data take on enhanced significance in the health system's southern region via a program called Achieving Excellence. In this initiative, a small group of physician leaders whom patients rated highly in various metrics have become ambassadors who shadow other physicians and mentor them on aspects of caregiving ranging from their body language and how they communicate with patients to how they interact with their computer during a patient visit. "We have seen some measurable changes in the numbers of physicians who have taken part in this program or requested this assistance to help with their professional development," she says.
The hospital also relies heavily on nonemployee volunteers called patient and family advisers (PFAs), who serve on committees and task forces that are working to optimize how staff members deliver care. Another team of PFAs does real-time rounding in the hospital to get patients' impressions of the care they are receiving and to collect stories and comments, about both good and bad experiences, which they bring back to the department leaders. "Having a patient as a member of a committee or task force changes the conversation and helps us think about the decisions we are making—how the changes impact patients—and that is something that has not necessarily been a part of our culture," Majewski says.
The unstructured data collected by PFAs are vital to improving the patient experience. "Some of the stories are positive, and some of them are constructive to help us change," Majewski says. "And it has been very helpful for our staff to see these comments because they may not have realized how they are coming across to their patients."
Press Ganey's Lee endorses this data-centric approach to improvement. "You can't simply do a few hundred patients via paper surveys once a year," he said. "That may get CMS off your back, if you've met the criteria of 300 surveys per year by paper. But if you want to actually drive improvement so you can compete, then you need data on lots of patients so you can begin to have accountability down to the individual clinician level."
Top Drivers of HCAHPS Ratings: Overall “Top Box” Within Service Lines
Experts tout patient experience as a key differentiator in today's consumer-driven, competitive healthcare landscape. According to research by Press Ganey, the three most important things that create peace of mind for the patient are, in order: confidence in the clinician, teamwork, and empathy.
"The really interesting thing is, after you take into account those variables, things like waiting time, convenience, access, and making an appointment didn't matter for likelihood to recommend," Lee says. "What patients really value is: Do you have good people who are working well together and are listening to them?"
Lynn Barr, chief transformation officer of the National Rural Accountable Care Consortium, notes that the rural hospitals she works with are usually the only game in town and are not included in the IPPS penalties for low HCAHPS scores. Yet even these perceived monopolies have much to gain competitively by improving patient satisfaction.
What stands out to Barr, when she analyzes data from the organization's 175 member hospitals, is how poorly many perform at capturing the customers closest to them. "We are working with rural health systems and clinics in isolated areas that are a monopoly in their town," Barr says. "They should have 70 percent of the claims, and instead they have 30 or 35 percent—and those are of their attributed lives. Those are their most loyal patients. These are facilities with high costs because their volume is low. If you are a business and want to drive volume, how do you do that? Customer satisfaction."
It's a dynamic Pu understands well. Although Twin Rivers is the only hospital in town, he estimates five hospitals are within 30 minutes to one hour of his facility. "We have always had significant out-migration, particularly for specialty care," he says. "Patients didn't have as many choices years ago as they have today. So if patients know they are going to get quality care with us, as well as compassionate care, they are more likely to support us.
"At the end of the day, if we care for patients with empathy and allow staff to serve their purpose for getting into health care in the first place—which is to care for people—we will develop loyalty with our staff and community that no one can regulate or take away from us. This is the key for long-term sustainability for our facility."
The need for hospitals to compete is also apparent in the terminology now used around creating a better patient experience. Words such as "brand" and "product," once confined to the retail industry, are taking on relevance in health care.
As Majewski says, "From an organizational perspective, it is about patients wanting to interact with us, their loyalty, and their affiliation with us. They want to see us as creating value for them if they are to continue in the relationship over time to achieve their health goals."
Lee adds that patient satisfaction and the peace of mind it produces is a product unto itself. "I would make the case that peace of mind is a core product; it may be the product, to tell you the truth," he says. "This is where patient experience comes in: Are we organized to produce that product and stop doing things that destroy peace of mind? I think of peace of mind as an outcome, as a product that is of extreme strategic and historic importance."
Chris Anderson is a freelance writer.
Interviewed for this article:
Thomas Lee, MD, chief medical officer, Press Ganey.
Carol Majewski, RN, director, office of patient experience, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H.
Steven Pu, DO, chief medical officer, Twins Regional Medical Center, Kennett, Mo.
Joan Becker, RN, patient experience partner, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis.
Lynn Barr, chief transformation officer, National Rural Accountable Care Consortium.
DHG Healthcare: Optimizing CDI for Bundled Payment Arrangements
Kaufman Hall: Five Key Learnings from HFMA’s Financial Analytics Leadership Council
Grant Thornton: Guiding Organizations Through Cloud-Based ERP Adoption
A senior leader at Grant Thornton LLP HealthCare Advisory Services talks about key ways to lay the groundwork for a shift to cloud-based ERP solutions. Insights stem from a presentation given at the HFMA Large System Controllers Council.
HealthTrust: Solving Workforce Management Challenges
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Building a Clinically-Integrated Network
As value-based payment models evolve, providers are challenged to maintain superior clinical outcomes while controlling costs.
Winning in the Post-Acute Marketplace
Read more about factors contributing to the changes in the post-acute marketplace and what it means for manufacturers, physicians, clinicians, patients, and post-acute facilities as they anticipate the transition to the second curve.
Building A Common Vision with Employed Physicians
HSG helped the physicians and executives of St. Claire Regional in Morehead, Kentucky, define their shared vision for how the group would evolve over the next decade. As well as, develop the strategic and operational priorities which refocused and accelerated the group’s evolution.
Practice Performance Improvement
The client was a nine-hospital health system with 14 clinics serving communities in a multi-state market with very limited access to care, poor economic conditions, high unemployment, and a heavy Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured payer mix. In most of these communities, the system was the sole source of care.
Though the clinics were of substantial size (they employed 98 physicians) and comprised of multiple specialists, the physicians functioned as individuals and the practices lacked any real group culture.
Clinical Integration Without Spending a Fortune
Clinical integration can be expensive, but it doesn’t have to be, as this four-step road map for developing a CIN proves. Does it have to cost millions to initiate a clinical integration strategy?
Contrary to popular belief, we have clients who have generated substantial shared savings and a significant ROI over time, without massive investments. Yes, some financial capital is required for resources the CIN providers can’t bring to the table themselves. But the size of that investment can be miniscule relative to the value it produces: improved outcomes and documentation for payers.
Adding Value to Physician Compensation
Today’s concerns about physician compensation are the result of the changing healthcare environment. The transition to value is slow, but finally becoming a reality. Proactive hospitals want to ensure that provider incentives are properly aligned with ever-increasing value-based demands.
This report focuses on the three big questions HSG receives about adding value to physician compensation; Why are organizations redesigning their provider compensation plans? What elements and parameters must be part of successful compensation plans? How are organizations implementing compensation changes?
Effective Revenue Cycle Management in Your Network
Revenue Cycle Management has become an even more complex issue with declining reimbursements, implementation of Electronic Health Records, evolving local carrier determinations (LCD), and payer credentialing [The emphasis on healthcare fraud, abuse and compliance has increased the importance of accuracy of data reporting and claims filing).
The efficiency of a medical practice’s billing operations has critical impact on the financial performance. In many cases, patient billings are the primary revenue source that pays staff salaries, provider compensation and overhead operating cost. Inefficiencies or inaccurate billing will contribute to operating losses.
Succeeding in Value-Based Care
This publication identifies and outlines the necessary characteristics of a fully-functioning clinically integrated network (CIN). What it doesn’t do is detail how hospitals and providers can participate in the value-based care environment during the development process.
One common misconception is that the CIN can’t do anything significant until it has obtained the FTC’s “clinically integrated” stamp of approval. While the network must satisfy the FTC’s definition of clinical integration before single signature contracting for FFS rates and contracts can legally start, hospitals and providers can enjoy three key benefits during the development process.
Therapy: Benefits at All Levels of Care
Nearly half of all Medicare beneficiaries treated in the hospital will need post-acute care services after discharge. For these patients, a stay in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility or other post-acute care setting comes between hospital and home.
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
With the proper process, tools, and feedback mechanisms in place, budgeting can be a valuable exercise for organizations while helping hold organizational leaders accountable. Having a proper monthly variance review process is one of the most critical factors in creating a more efficient and accurate budget. Monthly variance reporting puts parameters around what is to be expected during the upcoming budget entry process.
Cost Accounting: the Key to Cost Management and Profitability
Managing the cost of patient care is the top strategic priority of most hospital CFOs today. As healthcare shifts to more data-driven decision making, having clear visibility into key volume, cost and profitability measures across clinical service lines is becoming increasingly important for both long-range and tactical planning activities. In turn, the cost accounting function in healthcare provider organizations is becoming an increasingly important and strategic function. This whitepaper includes five strategies for efficient and accurate cost accounting and service line analytics and keys to overcoming the associated challenges.