Get the E-newsletter
David Nash, dean of the Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia. (Photo: Marshall Clarke)
The January 2015 announcement by Sylvia Burwell, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, might be framed as a timed test for America’s healthcare providers.
By the end of 2018, Medicare intends to make 50 percent of its payments through alternative payment models such as accountable care organizations and bundled- payment arrangements. In announcing the target date, Burwell gave health systems, physicians, and other providers three years to figure out how to succeed when they are financially at risk for the quality and cost of the care they provide.
Of course, many organizations have been tiptoeing into this new era of accountability. But knowing that the nation’s biggest payer sees 2018 as the payment reform tipping point makes the clock tick more loudly.
Alternative payment models have many success factors, but none is more important than the ability to manage patient health at the population level.
“So if you think of it as a three-year journey, we’re about one-third of the way there,” says David Nash, MD, MBA, dean of the Jefferson College of Population Health at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia. “I would say we’re making good progress toward population health.”
His comment was based on recent visits to some of the largest national and regional health systems, where he found population health initiatives that appear poised to pay off. For example, Mercy Health Partners in Cincinnati hired nurse care coordinators to give one-on-one attention to patients with chronic conditions; for patients who had been in care coordination for six months, admissions per 1,000 patients, emergency department visits per 1,000 patients, and inpatient days per 1,000 patients all fell by more than 20 percent on an annualized basis.
That said, not all provider organizations are reading from the same study guide.
“It goes from independent community hospitals that really are hoping this will all go away to national systems like Trinity and Ascension that are devoting millions of dollars in new resources to population health,” he says. “The range is pretty remarkable.”
Nash has been focused on the intersection of payment reform and population health management for years. When the Affordable Care Act became law in 2010, he summarized it in four words—”no outcome, no income”—and the phrase has since become his mantra.
Trained as an internist, Nash received a master’s degree in business from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in 1986, long before the MD and MBA credentials became a popular combination. He started the Department of Health Policy at Jefferson Medical College in 2003, and five years later he became the founding dean of the College of Population Health.
Currently serving just under 300 students, the first-of-its-kind school offers master’s degrees and certificate programs in population health, health policy, and healthcare quality and safety, among other disciplines. The average age of students is 45, and most are already credentialed as nurses, pharmacists, radiation technologists, or other healthcare professionals. About 70 students are physicians.
“These are folks who are mid- career, working online with us—weekends, early morning, late at night—on a career trajectory to become leaders in the change from volume to value,” Nash says.
In an interview with Healthcare Executive last year, Nash recommended several strategies that healthcare leaders should use to advance population health management. Almost every item has been on the work plan of forward-thinking provider organizations. But that doesn’t mean all of the recommendations are being successfully applied throughout the industry. Nash offered this progress report:
Begin population health management efforts with the employee population. “We are doing a terrible job with this because, regrettably, our whole industry has not placed sufficient interest and resources in the health of their own employees,” Nash says. “I would give us a C grade.”
Employers in other industries are way ahead. He encourages healthcare executives to follow the example of manufacturers, supermarket chains, and other companies that recognize the economic benefit of encouraging workers to adopt healthy habits, get recommended screenings, and avoid inappropriate imaging and other wasteful services.
“Your employees are your captive at-risk population, although most delivery systems have not viewed their own employees in that way,” he says. “And then we wonder why our benefits continue to increase in cost.”
Provide appropriate guidance for those who will lead patient-centered medical homes. A good clinician may not have the skills and attributes needed to proactively manage a population of patients. “There is a false assumption, in my view, that physicians should automatically become capable leaders of patient-centered medical homes,” Nash says. “My point is they need additional training, resources, and support.”
Increase the use of patient registries. Nash is waiting for the day he can walk into his office, open his laptop, and click on the “How am I doing?” icon.
“That’s what I want the icon to be called,” he says. “And when I click on it, up comes an amazing registry, with several categories. One category shows all of my patients who have insulin-dependent diabetes, or chronic obstructive lung disease, or stable angina, the bread-and-butter diagnoses of primary care practices.
“And in that registry, it also shows how I’m doing with regard to key population-based measures. Am I doing the right screening tests? Have I made the appropriate referrals? Am I ordering the appropriate generic drugs? And then that registry is also going to compare my performance with local, regional, and perhaps even national benchmarks.”
Although patient registries have been in use for many years, they are not yet standard practice for organizing a physician’s work. Until they are, Nash says, physicians are working without all the information they need to provide optimum care.
“When we have that kind of robust, agile registry, then I think we’ll really be practicing population-based medicine,” he says. “Right now, the folks who know more about our patients than we do are the payers.”
Partner with retail clinics. The clinics embedded in drug and grocery stores can support population health management in at least two ways: reducing use of high-cost emergency department visits for simple conditions such as strep throat and increasing access for patients with chronic conditions.
“I’d like to see the nurse practitioners in these retail clinics working more closely with, as an example, the faculty of Jefferson Medical College,” Nash says. “There’s a big opportunity here, especially with regard to patient education, given how often patients are in these retail settings versus how often they see their doctor.”
Partner with managed care plans. By “partner,” Nash does not mean “acquire.” “I cringe a little bit when I hear providers say ‘We’re going to start our own insurance plan,’” he says. “My first question is ‘How many actuaries do you employ?’”
Nash, who serves on the Humana board of directors, thinks insurers have two capabilities that providers typically lack: the actuarial expertise to assess and spread financial risk and the infrastructure to handle care coordination.
He is encouraged to see local and regional health plans working with providers on population health initiatives. “It would be great if we could bump this up to a national strategy,” he says. “I can envision a world where the Humanas, Aetnas, Cignas, etc., will have a large number of partnerships with providers in different geographies across the country.”
Provide funding for physician leadership training. “Am I pleased with what we see here? Definitely not,” Nash says.
Physician leaders need training in quality and safety, a systems approach to healthcare delivery, the application of Lean principles, and other competencies that are not taught in medical school.
In his view, health system CEOs recognize the importance of physician leadership but generally have not allocated resources to adequately train physicians for the bigger roles they are playing. “Therefore, the board needs to be asking: How are we training the physician leaders of tomorrow? It’s so important that this is a governance responsibility,” Nash says.
Nash acknowledges that his CEO to-do list will expand as population health management gains momentum. One of the biggest challenges: establishing and executing an action plan to address factors that, until recently, seemed far beyond a healthcare provider’s purview.
“Leaders are recognizing how inextricably intertwined social determinants are with the health of the population,” he says. “Medical care is 20 percent of the story. The real story is poverty—that’s the critical, most important predictor of health—and other subsidiary issues related to that, including crime and access to food and all the rest.”
That list includes personal behaviors—many of which are tightly related to socioeconomic status—that health systems cannot afford to ignore when they become financially accountable for the health of a population.
Tax-exempt hospitals, required by the Affordable Care Act to conduct a community health needs assessment, are coming to see that this is not just busywork to comply with a regulation. “Last year’s hypertension-screening day in the public park is going to seem pretty rudimentary very soon,” Nash says. “Leaders are hiring all kinds of new people to assess the situation, and they are going to learn pretty quickly how to address these challenges—and it’s going to be complicated.”
Nash serves on a National Quality Forum task force that is creating measures of hospital engagement with communities and will issue a report this fall. “There are many members of the task force who are adamant that hospitals should grow crops to feed the poor,” he says. “That may work in some places. Growing crops at Jefferson would be a big problem.”
As the healthcare industry remakes itself to succeed in the value movement, the roles and responsibilities of its leaders are changing—starting at the top.
Nash sees a dramatic change underway in board structure as clinically integrated networks move to competency-based governance. “We’re going to move from today’s typical hospital board, which may not have a single content expert, to boards with very specific competencies,” he says.
One example: Integris Health, the largest health system in Oklahoma, recently recruited Mark Werner, MD, a Minnesotan who has served as chief clinical integration officer for Fairview Health Services, president of Carilion Clinic Physicians, chief innovation officer for Medica Health Plans, and board chair for the American Association of Physician Leadership.
Moving from a volume-oriented business model to one that rewards value—and penalizes organizations that cannot deliver it—means that a board comprised of local civic leaders with no healthcare experience is no longer sufficient. The senior leadership team needs a new degree of support from board members who have a big-picture perspective on the value journey.
“Recruiters are getting overwhelmed with requests from not-for-profit hospital chains to find board members at the national level,” Nash says. “These big systems know that they have to look nationally to find the board member of the future.”
The roles of healthcare CEOs and CFOs also are changing along with the health system business model. “The blue-and-white hospital sign of the future is going to stand for health and healing, not acute and emergent care,” Nash says. “That’s going to determine the kinds of leaders we are going to need, and they will have a different skill set, for sure.”
As payment reform gains momentum, healthcare organizations will succeed only if their top executives embrace and implement the competencies needed to achieve the Triple Aim, Nash says.
“Improve the health of the population? That involves all the population health management skills, which means formal training in epidemiology and health risk assessment,” he says. “Reduce per capita cost? That’s all the systems thinking about efficiency, reducing unexplained variation. And of course the third part of the Triple Aim is to improve the individual experience of care. That requires understanding behavioral economics and related fields.”
The rest of the healthcare workforce also is redefining roles. The American College of Nurse Executives is developing its own list of population health competencies in recognition of how nurse responsibilities are increasing. Patient navigators, community health workers, and other emerging positions will become ever more important as health systems learn to proactively support a population of patients.
It adds up to the cultural change to which Nash has devoted his career.
“This change management is going to require tremendous leadership,” he says, “So are we training the right kinds of leaders? To me, the rate-limiting step—like in a chemistry equation—is leadership training. Without that, none of the other things can be done.”
Lola Butcher writes about healthcare business and policy topics for several HFMA publications.
Interviewed for this article:
David Nash, MD, MBA, dean, Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia.
Change Healthcare: Accelerating Revenue Cycle Transformation
Jason Williams, vice president for strategy and business analytics, Change Healthcare, discusses the importance of technology and technology-enabled services in reinventing the revenue cycle.
Ensemble Health Partners: Driving Revenue Cycle Innovation
Judson Ivy, president of Ensemble Health Partners, discusses the value of revenue cycle outsourcing and the importance of selecting the right partner.
Grant Thornton: Facilitating EAM
Priority Advantage: Helping Organizations Optimize Their Medicare Advantage Plans
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Building a Clinically-Integrated Network
As value-based payment models evolve, providers are challenged to maintain superior clinical outcomes while controlling costs.
Winning in the Post-Acute Marketplace
Read more about factors contributing to the changes in the post-acute marketplace and what it means for manufacturers, physicians, clinicians, patients, and post-acute facilities as they anticipate the transition to the second curve.
Building A Common Vision with Employed Physicians
HSG helped the physicians and executives of St. Claire Regional in Morehead, Kentucky, define their shared vision for how the group would evolve over the next decade. As well as, develop the strategic and operational priorities which refocused and accelerated the group’s evolution.
Practice Performance Improvement
The client was a nine-hospital health system with 14 clinics serving communities in a multi-state market with very limited access to care, poor economic conditions, high unemployment, and a heavy Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured payer mix. In most of these communities, the system was the sole source of care.
Though the clinics were of substantial size (they employed 98 physicians) and comprised of multiple specialists, the physicians functioned as individuals and the practices lacked any real group culture.
Clinical Integration Without Spending a Fortune
Clinical integration can be expensive, but it doesn’t have to be, as this four-step road map for developing a CIN proves. Does it have to cost millions to initiate a clinical integration strategy?
Contrary to popular belief, we have clients who have generated substantial shared savings and a significant ROI over time, without massive investments. Yes, some financial capital is required for resources the CIN providers can’t bring to the table themselves. But the size of that investment can be miniscule relative to the value it produces: improved outcomes and documentation for payers.
Adding Value to Physician Compensation
Today’s concerns about physician compensation are the result of the changing healthcare environment. The transition to value is slow, but finally becoming a reality. Proactive hospitals want to ensure that provider incentives are properly aligned with ever-increasing value-based demands.
This report focuses on the three big questions HSG receives about adding value to physician compensation; Why are organizations redesigning their provider compensation plans? What elements and parameters must be part of successful compensation plans? How are organizations implementing compensation changes?
Effective Revenue Cycle Management in Your Network
Revenue Cycle Management has become an even more complex issue with declining reimbursements, implementation of Electronic Health Records, evolving local carrier determinations (LCD), and payer credentialing [The emphasis on healthcare fraud, abuse and compliance has increased the importance of accuracy of data reporting and claims filing).
The efficiency of a medical practice’s billing operations has critical impact on the financial performance. In many cases, patient billings are the primary revenue source that pays staff salaries, provider compensation and overhead operating cost. Inefficiencies or inaccurate billing will contribute to operating losses.
Succeeding in Value-Based Care
This publication identifies and outlines the necessary characteristics of a fully-functioning clinically integrated network (CIN). What it doesn’t do is detail how hospitals and providers can participate in the value-based care environment during the development process.
One common misconception is that the CIN can’t do anything significant until it has obtained the FTC’s “clinically integrated” stamp of approval. While the network must satisfy the FTC’s definition of clinical integration before single signature contracting for FFS rates and contracts can legally start, hospitals and providers can enjoy three key benefits during the development process.
Therapy: Benefits at All Levels of Care
Nearly half of all Medicare beneficiaries treated in the hospital will need post-acute care services after discharge. For these patients, a stay in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility or other post-acute care setting comes between hospital and home.
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
With the proper process, tools, and feedback mechanisms in place, budgeting can be a valuable exercise for organizations while helping hold organizational leaders accountable. Having a proper monthly variance review process is one of the most critical factors in creating a more efficient and accurate budget. Monthly variance reporting puts parameters around what is to be expected during the upcoming budget entry process.
Cost Accounting: the Key to Cost Management and Profitability
Managing the cost of patient care is the top strategic priority of most hospital CFOs today. As healthcare shifts to more data-driven decision making, having clear visibility into key volume, cost and profitability measures across clinical service lines is becoming increasingly important for both long-range and tactical planning activities. In turn, the cost accounting function in healthcare provider organizations is becoming an increasingly important and strategic function. This whitepaper includes five strategies for efficient and accurate cost accounting and service line analytics and keys to overcoming the associated challenges.