Get the E-newsletter
Physicians and hospitals go together in patients’ minds like chefs and restaurants—they are both part of the same operation. But hospital executives and physician practice leaders know that the reality can be different. When hospitals and physicians join forces, especially when health systems acquire physician practices, complications often arise.
“The success rates of hospital acquisitions of physician practices are quite variable,” says Peter Angood, MD, the CEO and president of the American Association for Physician Leadership. “The success stories arise when both sides of the arrangement have been up front about setting their expectations for the relationship. Those that are less successful make a lot of assumptions.”
The unexpected consequences of physician practice acquisitions can be costly and disruptive. But, experts say, those consequences often can be avoided, and remembering the “people” side of the transaction is key.
Referrals are the source of some of the most common issues that occur when a health system acquires a physician practice. Naturally, the promise of increased referrals is a key reason for systems to acquire practices, but the reality doesn’t always meet that promise.
For example, if the acquired physicians have solid relationships with specialists who are not part of the system, they may prefer to retain those referral relationships rather than switch loyalties to the health system’s specialists. And the health system cannot compel them to do otherwise.
“Hospitals and universities cannot force referrals, and they have to be careful not to put too much pressure on physicians to make referrals,” says Debra Phairas, president of Practice & Liability Consultants, LLC in San Francisco. “I’ve had three physicians [clients] leave hospital foundations because they felt pressured to keep referrals within the hospital.”
The reason health systems cannot compel their physicians to refer within the organization is liability, Phairas explains. If a patient dies after being referred to a specialist, for example, and the patient’s family learns that the physician felt compelled to refer to that specialist despite not thinking that specialist was the best choice, a lawsuit could ensue.
So how can a health system persuade its doctors to voluntarily refer within? It should make sure the best specialists are part of the system, of course. It should make the referral process as easy as possible. And it should discuss the expectation of referrals early in the acquisition process.
“Hospitals need to drive revenue from these physicians,” notes Katharine Halpin, principal of The Halpin Companies, a mergers-and-acquisitions consulting firm. “If the physicians are referring patients to other facilities for tests or treatments, the forecasted goals and metrics cannot be achieved. The reasons vary, but typically they relate to poor quality of the services, weak structures that make referrals difficult for the physicians, or simply a lack of awareness by the physicians of this key expectation.”
But even when health systems have excellent internal referral procedures and the expectations are clear, the system should recognize that compulsion is not an option.
“If the community has a mix of employed and independent physicians, the referrals all come down to relationships,” Angood says. “So there’s no guarantee that if a hospital buys a practice, it will get all the referrals. In some cases the physician says, ‘OK, I’m comfortable referring to your physicians,’ while others say, ‘No, I prefer referring outside the system.’ This should be a point of discussion during negotiations but not a contractual obligation.”
Another potential issue with physician practice acquisitions is job satisfaction among newly employed physicians. Physicians are accustomed to being in charge and to commanding respect when they own a practice.
“Physicians often enter hospital employment because they want to decrease their bureaucratic burden, focus on patient care, get better compensation, and have a better work-life balance,” Angood says. “They may make the mistake of thinking they’ll get all of that and still maintain their autonomy and decision-making power. So it’s a shock when that doesn’t happen.”
Halpin concurs. “If leaders could engage the physicians at a granular level before the acquisition and build not only a shared vision and a commitment to agreed-upon expectations but also routine methods for consistent, honest communication, the success rate of these acquisitions could skyrocket,” she says.
Health systems should discuss expectations early, offer leadership positions to the acquired physicians, be transparent in decision making, and treat physicians with respect.
“It’s important to understand that the approach with the physician can’t be the same as with any other employee—you need an equitable partnership with them,” says Adhi Sharma, MD, chief medical officer of South Nassau Communities Hospital in Oceanside, N.Y. “You have to make sure they are partners, not simply drones.”
Monty Porter, JD, a member of the Health Care and Finance Practice Group at law firm Jackson Kelly PLLC, says one key is ensuring physicians still have a voice in their future.
“It’s obviously important to try to make physicians feel involved, and that they have a voice that can be heard and will allow them to continue to have some influence as to what happens to them going forward,” Porter says. “I think they understand that many final decisions rest with the hospital, but it serves the hospital well to realize that this is a big change for physicians.”
One way health systems can help physicians make the transition from being practice owners to being employees is by ensuring they have convenient and regular access to hospital leaders. Physicians may be uncomfortable having to follow a long chain of command to discuss a potential problem.
“If physicians feel they have access to the people who are higher up, and those people will hear their concerns, it will go a long way toward a successful transition,” says Heather Delgado, JD, a partner with the law firm Barnes & Thornburg who handles many physician practice acquisitions.
Providing a path to leadership roles and listening to concerns are important approaches, but little things also matter.
“I had a physician tell me that one of the things he loved about us was that our parking lot was less than a minute’s walk to get into the facility,” Tony Tedeschi, MD, the CEO of the Chicago market for Tenet Healthcare and CEO of Weiss Memorial Hospital, said in December at a panel discussion of hospital executives. “For physicians, those are precious moments—they’re moments that take them away from their family, they’re moments that take them away from patient care. Everything we do, we try to really do with a recognition of the importance and the respectfulness of that relationship.”
The location of the parking garage may not be something a hospital executive can change, but other small issues can go a long way toward demonstrating respect to physicians. For example, the time physicians need to spend documenting care these days can be draining; a $20-per-hour scribe could lighten that load.
Naturally, the ultimate result of unhappy physicians is turnover.
“Employed doctors do not have the same emotional and financial stake in their practice as independent doctors,” says Travis Singleton, senior vice president of physician search at consulting firm Merritt Hawkins. “For doctors, it’s a seller’s market. If you don’t like the way things are going, it is not too difficult to find greener pastures elsewhere. That’s why any acquisition program must have a strong retention element.”
Physicians may seek employment with a health system in large part for the opportunity to have a steadier income. But the cost structure of a health system is different from that of an independent physician practice—systems frequently lose money on their physician organizations—and granting physicians a pay increase following a merger is not always feasible.
“If you look at a hospital’s balance sheet, a lot of times physician practices are not huge money makers,” Delgado says. “They do provide physician integration into the system and increase the physician network, so there’s a lot of good that comes from an acquisition. But if you acquire a primary care practice and you pay the physicians and their staff a competitive salary and benefits, ramp up their electronic health record (EHR) system, and buy new equipment to get the practice up to hospital standards, you have a lot of costs.”
Some of the costs may not be obvious, Delgado notes. For example, the health system may need to lease new space to accommodate the practice, or it may find itself on the hook for insurance overpayments to the practice that took place prior to the acquisition.
The result is that physicians are sometimes unhappy with their new income, while health systems may feel they are not getting enough value from the physicians. Establishing a transparent compensation program, with incentives, is key to avoiding disappointment on either side.
Commonly, employed physicians are paid a base salary that represents a percentage of the median salary for that specialty—as determined by the Medical Group Management Association or physician compensation consulting firm Sullivan Cotter—combined with a bonus based on the number of RVUs the physician achieves above the corresponding percentage of median RVUs.
“For example, say the median work RVUs for internal medicine is 4,795 and the median salary is $222,000,” Phairas says. “If they set the base salary at 80 percent of that, the physician would have to achieve 3,836 work RVUs for the base. Anything over that base is going to be paid at a dollar amount per work RVU to incentivize them to be productive.”
Phairas says the bonus should not be capped— physicians who are highly productive should be highly compensated.
“I looked at one agreement in which the [physician] foundation capped the bonus at 10 percent over baseline,” she says. “I asked the hospital CEO, ‘Why would you do this? You are encouraging the doctor to do no more than he has to. The hospital loses and the doctor loses. You want them to be as productive as they can be.’”
However, the work RVU formula is designed for the fee-for-service world. The need to evolve the model as value-based compensation takes hold adds a new layer of complication to physician practice acquisitions.
Value-based payments encourage different activities from providers, of course. Rather than aiming for a greater number of procedures, hospitals and physicians theoretically aim for healthier overall patients. But that can be hard to measure, and consequently it’s hard to motivate caregivers in that direction.
Phairas has worked with healthcare organizations on value-based compensation programs. For example, she prepared one package in which 70 percent of compensation was based on the work RVU formula, 20 percent on quality metrics, and 10 percent on good citizenship, such as willingness to participate on committees.
Perhaps the best advice on making physician practice acquisitions work is simply to pay close attention to the human components.
“Because the focus of most due diligence processes is the legal and financial aspects of any merger or acquisition, the most important components are omitted,” Halpin says. “Without the right people in the right roles, focused on the right projects, no transaction will be successful. The key to success is to address the people side of the transaction.”
Ed Avis is a freelance writer based in Chicago who frequently writes about healthcare management topics.
Peter Angood, MD, CEO, American Association for
Physician Leadership; Heather Delgado, partner, Barnes & Thornburg; Katherine
Halpin Companies; Debra Phairas, president, Practice &
Liability Consultants, LLC; Monty Porter, JD, Health Care and Finance
Practice Group, Jackson Kelly PLLC; Adhi Sharma, MD, chief medical officer,
South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside, N.Y.; Travis Singleton, senior vice president, Merritt Hawkins.
Kaufman Hall: Five Key Learnings from HFMA’s Financial Analytics Leadership Council
Grant Thornton: Guiding Organizations Through Cloud-Based ERP Adoption
A senior leader at Grant Thornton LLP HealthCare Advisory Services talks about key ways to lay the groundwork for a shift to cloud-based ERP solutions. Insights stem from a presentation given at the HFMA Large System Controllers Council.
HealthTrust: Solving Workforce Management Challenges
R1 RCM: Partnering with Healthcare Organizations to Reimagine the Revenue Cycle
Two senior leaders at R1 talk about the advantages of working with an innovative revenue cycle partner that offers technology-enabled revenue cycle and patient experience services.
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Building a Clinically-Integrated Network
As value-based payment models evolve, providers are challenged to maintain superior clinical outcomes while controlling costs.
Winning in the Post-Acute Marketplace
Read more about factors contributing to the changes in the post-acute marketplace and what it means for manufacturers, physicians, clinicians, patients, and post-acute facilities as they anticipate the transition to the second curve.
Building A Common Vision with Employed Physicians
HSG helped the physicians and executives of St. Claire Regional in Morehead, Kentucky, define their shared vision for how the group would evolve over the next decade. As well as, develop the strategic and operational priorities which refocused and accelerated the group’s evolution.
Practice Performance Improvement
The client was a nine-hospital health system with 14 clinics serving communities in a multi-state market with very limited access to care, poor economic conditions, high unemployment, and a heavy Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured payer mix. In most of these communities, the system was the sole source of care.
Though the clinics were of substantial size (they employed 98 physicians) and comprised of multiple specialists, the physicians functioned as individuals and the practices lacked any real group culture.
Clinical Integration Without Spending a Fortune
Clinical integration can be expensive, but it doesn’t have to be, as this four-step road map for developing a CIN proves. Does it have to cost millions to initiate a clinical integration strategy?
Contrary to popular belief, we have clients who have generated substantial shared savings and a significant ROI over time, without massive investments. Yes, some financial capital is required for resources the CIN providers can’t bring to the table themselves. But the size of that investment can be miniscule relative to the value it produces: improved outcomes and documentation for payers.
Adding Value to Physician Compensation
Today’s concerns about physician compensation are the result of the changing healthcare environment. The transition to value is slow, but finally becoming a reality. Proactive hospitals want to ensure that provider incentives are properly aligned with ever-increasing value-based demands.
This report focuses on the three big questions HSG receives about adding value to physician compensation; Why are organizations redesigning their provider compensation plans? What elements and parameters must be part of successful compensation plans? How are organizations implementing compensation changes?
Effective Revenue Cycle Management in Your Network
Revenue Cycle Management has become an even more complex issue with declining reimbursements, implementation of Electronic Health Records, evolving local carrier determinations (LCD), and payer credentialing [The emphasis on healthcare fraud, abuse and compliance has increased the importance of accuracy of data reporting and claims filing).
The efficiency of a medical practice’s billing operations has critical impact on the financial performance. In many cases, patient billings are the primary revenue source that pays staff salaries, provider compensation and overhead operating cost. Inefficiencies or inaccurate billing will contribute to operating losses.
Succeeding in Value-Based Care
This publication identifies and outlines the necessary characteristics of a fully-functioning clinically integrated network (CIN). What it doesn’t do is detail how hospitals and providers can participate in the value-based care environment during the development process.
One common misconception is that the CIN can’t do anything significant until it has obtained the FTC’s “clinically integrated” stamp of approval. While the network must satisfy the FTC’s definition of clinical integration before single signature contracting for FFS rates and contracts can legally start, hospitals and providers can enjoy three key benefits during the development process.
Therapy: Benefits at All Levels of Care
Nearly half of all Medicare beneficiaries treated in the hospital will need post-acute care services after discharge. For these patients, a stay in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility or other post-acute care setting comes between hospital and home.
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
With the proper process, tools, and feedback mechanisms in place, budgeting can be a valuable exercise for organizations while helping hold organizational leaders accountable. Having a proper monthly variance review process is one of the most critical factors in creating a more efficient and accurate budget. Monthly variance reporting puts parameters around what is to be expected during the upcoming budget entry process.
Cost Accounting: the Key to Cost Management and Profitability
Managing the cost of patient care is the top strategic priority of most hospital CFOs today. As healthcare shifts to more data-driven decision making, having clear visibility into key volume, cost and profitability measures across clinical service lines is becoming increasingly important for both long-range and tactical planning activities. In turn, the cost accounting function in healthcare provider organizations is becoming an increasingly important and strategic function. This whitepaper includes five strategies for efficient and accurate cost accounting and service line analytics and keys to overcoming the associated challenges.