Get the E-newsletter
According to the National Institute of Mental Health, mental disorders affect tens of millions of Americans each year, and only about half of those individuals receive treatment. One barrier is the lack of reliable mechanisms in healthcare settings that ensure patients connect with mental health services.
As the industry aims to deliver higher-quality care at a lower cost, healthcare providers are recognizing the need to better integrate behavioral health care with primary care to make sure all patients get the treatments they require to sustain long-term health outcomes. In this edition of the Healthcare Challenge Roundtable, senior provider and health plan leaders examine strategies for achieving such integration.
Participating are Michael Alwell, vice president, revenue cycle for RWJBarnabas Health, West Orange, N.J.; Michael Plopper, MD, chief medical officer, Sharp Behavioral Health Services, San Diego; and Hyong Un, MD, chief psychiatric officer, Aetna.
Hyong Un: First, most people seek treatment for a mental health condition in the primary care setting because their primary care doctor is usually their most trusted physician. Although many behavioral health issues can be successfully managed as part of primary care, it is helpful to have behavioral health resources—psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, social workers, and so on—readily available should the patient’s problem surpass the primary care physician’s abilities.
In addition, chronic medical disorders—including coronary artery disease, diabetes, and musculoskeletal issues—regularly have a behavioral health component. In many cases, there will be depression associated with these disorders, which can impact patients’ abilities to adhere to medication regimens and self-manage their conditions. It is crucial that organizations be aware of and treat the underlying behavioral alterations of physical comorbidities.
Overall, assimilating behavioral health into primary care is important to maintain the health of a patient population. Especially as organizations take on responsibility for more-holistic patient care that emphasizes value, they are starting to appreciate the criticality of behavioral health resources. Let’s face it, you can’t manage chronic illness, limit unnecessary emergency room visits, and reduce avoidable readmissions without these kinds of resources.
Michael Alwell: When behavioral health care and primary care are integrated, primary care physicians can quickly refer patients to the appropriate behavioral health practitioners to meet the patients’ needs. Not only does this approach ensure that patients receive the level of care they require, but it also avoids placing the primary care providers in a position where they must address a condition that might be outside of their comfort zone. Also, if you can bring both types of care into a single practice location, it saves time on the billing side because you may not need to obtain additional authorizations and potentially refer the patient outside of the network.
Michael Plopper: The coordination of behavioral health care and primary care has been an underdeveloped component of healthcare delivery in the United States for a long time. Although providers have talked about the need for integration for at least 20 years, the country is not at a place where it could say it has accomplished this goal—other than in a few locations.
Oftentimes communication is quite poor between mental health and primary health delivery systems. The traditional siloed care models have led to subpar interactions and missed opportunities. Due to the stigma associated with mental health, the dearth of payment mechanisms for these types of services, and psychosocial factors such as lack of transportation and family support, patients who are seriously ill—and even those with less severe illnesses—can struggle to receive appropriate and adequate mental health care.
Un: Behavioral health specialists and primary care physicians approach patient diagnosis and care differently, and this has historically presented some roadblocks to integration. For example, primary care physicians tend to see patients at a fairly rapid rate, and weaving behavioral health into the primary care office workflow could be problematic, particularly if the behavioral healthcare delivery model follows traditional behavioral health workflows. Therapists are accustomed to seeing their patients for 30 minutes to an hour, and that may or may not work in a primary care setting where doctors see patients every 10 to 15 minutes.
There have also been issues around financing. For the longest time, behavioral health was carved out as separate from the rest of a person’s medical health benefits. In fact, Aetna was one of the first companies to integrate behavioral health and medical health and have the financing come from one source. Not every payer takes this approach, and that can add complications to the behavioral health-primary care dynamic.
Ultimately, bringing behavioral health and primary health together requires marrying two different delivery systems and two different financing systems. That coupled with the variations in practice style and workflow makes integration challenging. Things are starting to change, but it’s going to take a while.
Alwell: Another barrier has been the reluctance of some behavioral health providers to participate in managed care networks. Historically, the payment rates tied to these networks have been quite low for behavioral health professionals.
To overcome this issue, some large hospitals and health systems, like RWJBarnabas, are employing behavioral health professionals, enrolling them into various managed care plans and placing them in offices side by side with primary care providers—thereby improving access for patients who need the services. That said, it becomes quite costly for healthcare organizations to employ these providers. However, we view it as part of a much larger primary care strategy that encompasses this kind of care.
Un: I think organizations should look at three different metric domains: structure, process, and outcomes measures. Structurally, you must have behavioral health resources that are available for integration—enough psychiatrists, therapists, care managers, and so on. You also need the ability to create and manage a registry.
Once you have a sense of the structure, then make sure you’re following solid processes. Are you consistently screening for mental illness, such as depression? Are you referring those patients who screen positive to a mental health provider? Is there two-way communication between the primary care office and the mental health provider?
In addition to process measures, study patient outcomes. For patients with depression, does their average depression score decrease? Are suicide rates dropping? Are there fewer emergency room visits? Finally, review patient satisfaction scores for patients with a diagnosed mental illness. Do they feel their needs were addressed? Were providers compassionate?
Alwell: The integration of behavioral care and primary care should result in a reduction in emergency department (ED) visits and reduced psychiatric admissions. Through integration, providers may be able to monitor whether patients are compliant with their medications for both the mental illness and any chronic conditions. If the behavioral health issues are not being managed properly, there’s a good possibility the patients aren’t going to be compliant with any of their medication regimens and will end up back in the hospital or ED for medical conditions in addition to behavioral health problems.
Plopper: Another metric to examine is follow-up after initial screening. Right now, primary care offices are starting to effectively screen for conditions such as depression. However, it would be smart to look at what happens after these patients are screened and found to have depression or another mental illness. Are they provided services? Are they referred to a specialist? Are they compliant with medication? Is there improved attention once the disorder is identified?
It also might be beneficial to study severe negative outcomes, such as suicide rates or hospitalizations for mental illness. The literature supports the notion that patients who commit suicide have sometimes seen a primary care doctor in the recent past. There’s an opportunity to better provide services for people who are ill and contemplating this drastic act. Similarly, some hospitalizations could be avoided if patients were better served on an outpatient basis.
Plopper: Even though the industry has been talking about integration for 20 years, there aren’t many great models out there. One that is effective is called the Collaborative Care Model and emerged from Dr. Jurgen Unutzer at the University of Washington. It’s moderately robust and has been in place for a number of years, demonstrating improved outcomes and care quality at lower costs. The model mostly involves ready access for primary care offices to psychiatric consultation—either in person or through telemedicine.
Un: The University of Washington model is probably the best one. There are numerous quality studies that indicate it works. To be effective, an integrated program must have care management, registry use, and measurement-driven care, and Dr. Unutzer’s model has all those components.
Alwell: At RWJBarnabas Health, we are working on a program in which we will place a psychiatric advanced practice nurse (APN) in a primary care physician’s office. The primary care provider will screen for depression and other cognitive impairments and refer any patients who screen positive to the APN, who can further assess the patient’s cognitive needs or behavioral issues and prescribe therapy or medications as appropriate. Because the APN is located on site, we believe there will be greater interaction between primary care and behavioral health.
Plopper: Most of the models I’ve worked with are self-funded or funded through grants. For integration to take hold, it is going to require global payment policies in which payers and providers are accountable for the total cost of care and patient outcomes. I think there should be a stronger effort by public-sector payers to lead the way. As healthcare systems, we have many different masters in terms of our payment sources, and that can lead to complexity and confusion. The more we can come together and break down barriers, the more we can make some meaningful change.
Alwell: We are in discussions with one of the largest payers in New Jersey about integrating behavioral health and primary care, looking to increase the referrals from primary care to behavioral health and streamline that process.
For many health plans, an important first step should be finding ways to incentivize primary care to refer patients for early screening by behavioral health professionals. Some of these primary care physicians are afraid to refer out of their practice for fear of being penalized by the insurance plan for overutilization of resources. With an integrated system, the referral and initial treatment could reside within the practice if the plan allowed the primary care physician to have an APN or other psychiatric professional within the practice.
Another step would be to break down the silos between reimbursement channels. A number of payers still carve out patients’ behavioral health benefits from their medical benefits, and that separation often causes confusion for both patients and providers, sometimes resulting in delays in treatment.
Un: I’ve been at this for 15 years, and I think in the past three to four, things have really started to move forward. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services just approved a set of codes related to collaboration and integration, and they are also more focused on care management. The American Psychiatric Association has a large project to retrain psychiatrists in a model that is more collaborative.
Much of the improvement we’ve seen so far has stemmed from different organizations realizing that behavioral health is essential to value-based contracting. With that and a shortage of psychiatrists, organizations are beginning to understand the benefits of offering some level of behavioral health care in the primary care setting.
There always will be a need for specialist psychiatrists. We have seriously ill patients with mental health conditions who will need to be managed by a psychiatrist, but there’s a sizable number of patients who through a collaborative care model can be monitored without having to see a psychiatrist because they can be managed successfully in the primary care setting.
Kathleen Vega is an HFMA contributing
writer and editor.
Interviewed for this article: Michael Alwell, vice president,
revenue cycle, RWJBarnabas Health, West Orange, N.J.; Michael
MD, chief medical officer, Sharp Behavioral Health Services, San Diego; Hyong
MD, chief psychiatric officer, Aetna.
Check out previous installments of the
Healthcare Challenge Roundtable:
Assessing the Value of
Optimizing the Preauthorization Process
Working Together to Make Alternative Payment Models Succeed
Grant Thornton: Helping Organizations Embrace Robotic Process Automation
Two senior leaders at Grant Thornton talk about the advantages of robotic process automation to improve office efficiency, reduce costs, and mitigate risk.
VitalWare: Creating a Transparency Strategy: Meeting the Mandate to Post Standard Hospital Pricing
A senior leader of VitalWare talks about the need to create a comprehensive pricing strategy for consumers and how to get started.
HealthTrust: Solving Workforce Management Challenges
Two of HealthTrust’s senior leaders talk about strategies for optimizing the hospital workforce to improve productivity and reduce waste.
Grant Thornton: Optimizing the Ambulatory Workforce
One of Grant Thornton’s senior healthcare consultants addresses the topic of workforce management and the importance of a data-driven approach.
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Building a Clinically-Integrated Network
As value-based payment models evolve, providers are challenged to maintain superior clinical outcomes while controlling costs.
Winning in the Post-Acute Marketplace
Read more about factors contributing to the changes in the post-acute marketplace and what it means for manufacturers, physicians, clinicians, patients, and post-acute facilities as they anticipate the transition to the second curve.
Building A Common Vision with Employed Physicians
HSG helped the physicians and executives of St. Claire Regional in Morehead, Kentucky, define their shared vision for how the group would evolve over the next decade. As well as, develop the strategic and operational priorities which refocused and accelerated the group’s evolution.
Practice Performance Improvement
The client was a nine-hospital health system with 14 clinics serving communities in a multi-state market with very limited access to care, poor economic conditions, high unemployment, and a heavy Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured payer mix. In most of these communities, the system was the sole source of care.
Though the clinics were of substantial size (they employed 98 physicians) and comprised of multiple specialists, the physicians functioned as individuals and the practices lacked any real group culture.
Clinical Integration Without Spending a Fortune
Clinical integration can be expensive, but it doesn’t have to be, as this four-step road map for developing a CIN proves. Does it have to cost millions to initiate a clinical integration strategy?
Contrary to popular belief, we have clients who have generated substantial shared savings and a significant ROI over time, without massive investments. Yes, some financial capital is required for resources the CIN providers can’t bring to the table themselves. But the size of that investment can be miniscule relative to the value it produces: improved outcomes and documentation for payers.
Adding Value to Physician Compensation
Today’s concerns about physician compensation are the result of the changing healthcare environment. The transition to value is slow, but finally becoming a reality. Proactive hospitals want to ensure that provider incentives are properly aligned with ever-increasing value-based demands.
This report focuses on the three big questions HSG receives about adding value to physician compensation; Why are organizations redesigning their provider compensation plans? What elements and parameters must be part of successful compensation plans? How are organizations implementing compensation changes?
Effective Revenue Cycle Management in Your Network
Revenue Cycle Management has become an even more complex issue with declining reimbursements, implementation of Electronic Health Records, evolving local carrier determinations (LCD), and payer credentialing [The emphasis on healthcare fraud, abuse and compliance has increased the importance of accuracy of data reporting and claims filing).
The efficiency of a medical practice’s billing operations has critical impact on the financial performance. In many cases, patient billings are the primary revenue source that pays staff salaries, provider compensation and overhead operating cost. Inefficiencies or inaccurate billing will contribute to operating losses.
Succeeding in Value-Based Care
This publication identifies and outlines the necessary characteristics of a fully-functioning clinically integrated network (CIN). What it doesn’t do is detail how hospitals and providers can participate in the value-based care environment during the development process.
One common misconception is that the CIN can’t do anything significant until it has obtained the FTC’s “clinically integrated” stamp of approval. While the network must satisfy the FTC’s definition of clinical integration before single signature contracting for FFS rates and contracts can legally start, hospitals and providers can enjoy three key benefits during the development process.
Therapy: Benefits at All Levels of Care
Nearly half of all Medicare beneficiaries treated in the hospital will need post-acute care services after discharge. For these patients, a stay in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility or other post-acute care setting comes between hospital and home.
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
With the proper process, tools, and feedback mechanisms in place, budgeting can be a valuable exercise for organizations while helping hold organizational leaders accountable. Having a proper monthly variance review process is one of the most critical factors in creating a more efficient and accurate budget. Monthly variance reporting puts parameters around what is to be expected during the upcoming budget entry process.
Cost Accounting: the Key to Cost Management and Profitability
Managing the cost of patient care is the top strategic priority of most hospital CFOs today. As healthcare shifts to more data-driven decision making, having clear visibility into key volume, cost and profitability measures across clinical service lines is becoming increasingly important for both long-range and tactical planning activities. In turn, the cost accounting function in healthcare provider organizations is becoming an increasingly important and strategic function. This whitepaper includes five strategies for efficient and accurate cost accounting and service line analytics and keys to overcoming the associated challenges.