By Ali Philander and Jacob Kupietzky
Operating room (OR) efficiency is a measure of how well time and resources are deployed on a daily basis. When operating efficiently, the OR can bring in large profit margins. Some hospitals have seen contribution margins as high as $6,000 per surgeon, per OR hour (Dexter, F., and Ledolter, J., "Managing Risk and Expected Financial Return from Selective Expansion of Operating Room Capacity: Mean-Variance Analysis of a Hospital's Portfolio of Surgeons," Anesthesia & Analgesia, July 2003, pp. 190-195). On the other hand, a poorly run OR can be a huge financial weight on a hospital's bottom line.
Also, both physicians and patients find satisfaction in an OR environment where their cases are predictable and start on time, which ensures that the appropriate amount of time and resources match the expected schedule.
While there are many different ways senior hospital leaders can implement change to improve OR efficiency, we recommend using the "rapid cycle change" approach.
Rapid cycle change requires minimal time investment with a maximum impact and sustainable results. This approach almost always requires a dedicated team or task force to dig deep into problems within an organization and identify solutions to improve efficiency.
A 479-bed, for-profit hospital in the Southwest was experiencing poor efficiency and utilization, but did not understand the root causes, financial impact, and how to improve performance. After a thorough assessment was conducted, it was determined that there were significant opportunities to improve the following six areas:
The OR team, along with its external support, used the rapid cycle change approach for more than eight weeks to redesign and improve the six areas by using flow charts, data, posters, and data transparency. There were also intensive workshops for OR and surgical staff members on such topics as leadership training, Lean management, teamwork, service training, and facilitation. Each area initiative had a leader and a physician co-sponsor who were responsible for tracking progress.
In eight weeks, first case delays in the OR went from 23 minutes to nine, case cancellations dropped 16 percent, and utilization increased 33 percent. The hospital achieved $800,000 in cost savings and annualized new revenue of $550,000.
There are three stages in a rapid cycle change engagement: assessment, redesign, and implementation. Each of these stages lasts up to four to six weeks and requires buy-in from senior hospital leadership and OR staff.
Assessment. The first step is assembling a task force that will diagnose problems in OR operations, figure out why these problems exist, and communicate the problems to leadership and the OR staff. It is the responsibility of senior leadership, in collaboration with their physician partners, to structure a task force with mutual representation and responsibility for outcomes. This task force comprises physicians, nurses, and management who have OR experience and can objectively identify problems in OR operations. Secondly, these individuals should inspire the OR staff to change their current operating behaviors.
Once the OR task force is assembled, it should meet with OR staff, physicians, and members of senior leadership to communicate the following:
This first meeting is meant to rally the physicians and staff behind the project and excite them about the pending changes. After this initial meeting, the task force should begin observing OR operations to identify where the inefficiencies are.
See sidebar:Focal Points for OR Assessment
Redesign. After the task force's assessment findings have been presented, hospital leaders must determine
which improvement opportunities the hospital should pursue. Typically, opportunities should yield a certain amount of financial and quality improvement in a defined period of time to justify the time and resource investment.
The task force then works with hospital staff to redesign processes, eliminate bottlenecks, and improve efficiency of operations. Process redesign should be very organized and detailed. Project management documents should outline what responsibilities belong to each employee, the order of importance of process changes, and a timeline for when the changes will occur.
See sidebar:Key Elements of OR Redesign
Task force members and clinical directors work together to agree on short- and long-term goals that measure improvements, as well as efficiency metrics that allow performance tracking. For example, a hospital OR may set the goal of improving OR turnaround time to less than 25 minutes by March 2012. The turnaround time metric might be defined as the "mean time from the previous patient out of the OR to the next patient in the OR, including set up and clean up."
Implementation. The implementation portion of the initiative is crucial. The OR task force must educate and retrain staff, as well as help sustain results. Educational sessions should explain how processes and clinical protocols will change and give staff an opportunity to ask questions and voice concerns. New protocols and processes should be made available in written form for staff to keep and review.
It is important to monitor the effectiveness of educational initiatives and compliance with protocols. Some hospitals have the capability to monitor compliance electronically. Hospitals that don't have that capability should monitor compliance through shadowing and audits.
Monitoring changes on a dashboard is imperative. This dashboard would help staff track whether they have met poor, medium, or high performance targets for each goal. For example, here are possible targets for the OR turnover time goal.
This information should be shared on a weekly or monthly basis. For turnaround times and delays, it can be very effective to post this information by shift, department, and surgeon on a daily basis. Creating healthy competition can motivate your staff to perform.
When goals are met, reward your team with a pizza lunch or something to acknowledge the team's efforts and success. Daily encouragement and positive reinforcement is a must.
Once the initiative is underway, it is important to have adequate resources to monitor and sustain the success of the changes made in the OR. The best way to do this is through the creation of an OR committee, under the sponsorship of the hospital's senior leadership team. An OR committee typically comprises administrative and physician staff and is charged with overseeing OR operations. Physicians on the committee should be well respected and well liked, and they should have the ability to steer their peers.
An OR committee has several main functions:
The committee would also monitor OR efficiency on a long-term basis, assuming the day-to-day oversight of the task force is no longer needed.
The benefit of rapid cycle is that it accomplishes a lot in a short period of time. Hospitals should implement the essential pieces of this approach-assessment, redesign, and implementation-when attempting to significantly change operations in a department.
We believe that any hospital can engage in a change initiative; the most difficult part is sustaining those changes. Without sustainability, all efforts are for naught.
The following are essential key takeaways to reform OR operations and sustain those changes:
Ali Philander is a senior analyst, HealthCare Transformation, LLC, Chicago (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Jacob Kupietzky is president, HealthCare Transformation, LLC (email@example.com).
TriMedx: Elevating and Streamlining Clinical Engineering
TriMedx helps health systems control costs and uncover savings opportunities by optimizing the clinical engineering function.
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
McKesson: Leveraging Predictive Analytics to Rein in Operating Costs
A leader from McKesson discusses how healthcare reform is forcing hospitals and health systems to take a different approach to capacity management and patient flow.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Accretive Health: Partners with Providers to Excel in a Rapidly Transforming Revenue Cycle Environment
Emad Rizk, MD, president and CEO of Accretive Health, discusses the uncertainty facing hospitals and the transitions affecting revenue cycle management.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
Conifer Health Solutions: Helping Providers and Employers Build a Foundation for Better Health
Jim Bohnsack, vice president, solution & corporate development for Conifer Health Solutions, explains how the company helps healthcare providers leverage data to deliver better outcomes while optimizing reimbursement for all payment arrangements.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Ontario Systems: Optimizing Accounts Receivable in a Rapidly Changing Environment
Steve Scibetta, senior director of channel sales for Ontario Systems' healthcare product line, shares insights into effectively managing receivables.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Optum: Enabling Transformative Change
Elena White, vice president of risk, quality, and network solutions for Optum, discusses how healthcare providers can leverage data and technology as they enable risk in their organization.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
Somnia: Bending the Healthcare Cost Curve Toward Improved Anesthesia Value
Somnia President and CEO Marc Koch, MD, MBA, explains how hospitals can drive transformative change in the perioperative experience for outstanding clinical and financial outcomes.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
PMMC: Navigating Revenue Cycle Management Challenges as Value Based Purchasing Emerges
PMMC President Roger L. Shaul discusses the effects of healthcare reform on revenue cycle management and how PMMC's products help clients adapt to a changing financial environment.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Burgess: Simplify the Business of Healthcare
Greg Burgess, Founder and Chief Product Officer at Burgess Group shares insights and opportunities for payment integrity in the rapidly changing healthcare IT landscape.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.