Get the E-newsletter
in designing a rational healthcare system arises from the fact that the most
important components in the system—people—often act irrationally.
view of purveyors of behavioral economics, a field that applies psychological
insights to understand and guide human behavior.
of behavioral economics to positively affect health care is proving to be significant,
said David Asch, MD (pictured at right), executive director of the Penn Medicine Center for Health
behavior is on the final common pathway of every single advance in health
care,” Asch said. “Even an incredibly effective drug or an incredibly effective
vaccine requires a physician to prescribe it and a patient to take it, and
those things aren’t quite as simple as they may seem.
that helps us motivate the clinicians and the patients would tremendously
advance health care and let us take the scientific advances and deliver them to
patients more effectively. What behavioral economics does is it effectively supercharges
Asch noted during a presentation at HFMA’s 2018 Thought Leadership Retreat in
Washington, D.C., public health campaigns and healthcare provider initiatives have
relied on the notion that given the right information, people will make the
right decisions. Examples include nutrition and calorie labeling and informed
issue with that concept, noting that information alone provides a shaky foundation.
Most people already know that smoking can be harmful, for example, so
educational campaigns such as the one being promoted by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention may not make an impact.
advanced step, which also may fall short of the mark, is to use standard
economic approaches. The idea is that offering financial incentives will prod
people to act the right way. But human nature does not frequently translate to
actuary-style decision making.
Behavioral economics goes beyond standard economics,
contributing “an understanding of how people actually make decisions, which is
often not so rational,” Asch said. “They make their decisions based on emotion
and framing and things like that, and that’s not what’s taught in medical
The Penn Center for Healthcare Innovation differs from many
provider-based innovation centers, Asch said, in that it goes beyond tech-transfer
or IT initiatives to examine how care delivery processes can be improved.
Behavioral economics is central to this effort. The Center
established what Asch said is the nation’s first “nudge unit” at an academic
health system. The unit’s purpose “is to find gentle but effective ways to
change the behavior of either our clinicians or our patients toward more
optimal clinical outcomes,” he said.
On the clinician side, a nudge could be used to increase referrals
to cardiac rehabilitation for patients who have had a heart attack, which has
been established as a best practice but typically requires various steps on the
part of the referring physician. Conversely, a nudge might be deployed to
dissuade a physician from utilizing unnecessary diagnostic testing.
For patients, nudges can promote adherence to exercise
programs or medication regimens, or visits with a physician.
“There are so many elements of
health care that are dependent on the patient’s behavior, and of course
patients are highly motivated to improve their behavior, but each of those
things is hard,” Asch said. “So rather than just tell people, ‘Go do that,’ we
should recognize that it’s hard. How do we make it a little bit easier to
remember? How do we make it a little bit easier to do? How do we keep people
from falling into the traps that humans naturally fall into?”
At Penn Medicine, one situation that needed addressing, Asch
said, was the tendency of clinicians in the health system to prescribe
brand-name drugs when generic versions—vastly cheaper yet similarly effective—were
available. “All the clinicians knew that they should be prescribing the generic
drugs, and we’d had meetings with clinicians, we did everything possible, yet
the level of prescribing of generic drugs was flat for each of these agents,”
The information systems team then implemented a small but
crucial change in the physician order entry system, making the generic version
of a drug the default choice. Physicians had to opt out to access the
brand-name variety. The difference in prescribing patterns was immediate and substantial,
and indicative of the potential of targeted nudges to effect change.
“It didn’t restrict anybody’s liberty—the physicians could use the
brand if they wanted to,” Asch said. “But remember, these were physicians who wanted
to use generics, they were just in the habit of using brand-name drugs. So we
got them out of their habit, we greased the skids for them to do what they
fundamentally wanted to do, which we thought was also better patient care.
“If you just thought that education or financial incentives
were the way to go, you would never have thought of that particular approach.”
Providing default options is one
example of a nudge that is based in behavioral economics because it recognizes
the status quo bias that is hardwired
into human beings. Others include:
Lottery-based rewards: State lotteries capitalize on the innate regret aversion of the human mind, Asch
noted. Advertising campaigns target people who play the lottery regularly,
imploring them not to let this be the week that they don’t play their number—because
this just might be the week that their number wins. Such campaigns are
effective despite the impossibly low odds of winning the lottery.
Providers can use the same trick
on patients in tandem with pill-bottle technology that allows medication
adherence to be monitored remotely. A lottery can be held each day or each week,
with, say, a $100 prize going to the patient whose number is drawn at random.
But patients are ineligible to win if they did not take their medication. The
fear of getting a message that their number was drawn and they would have won
if they taken their medication is a powerful motivator.
“They don’t have to get the regret
message, they just anticipate it,” Asch said.
Straightforward incentive structures. Asch thinks the concept of
value-based insurance design (VBID) is flawed because of its complexity. He
cited a study
in which almost 6,000 patients who’d had a heart attack were randomized into
one of two groups. The first owed standard copayments for statins and other
preventive medications, while the second had their copayments waived.
Although medication adherence was
four to six percentage points higher in the second group, there was no
difference in time until first major vascular event or revascularization.
The results indicate what Asch
described as the “asymmetric” nature of VBID. Copayment increases can be
effective at discouraging people from taking a medication or seeking a form of
treatment that is considered low-value. But copayment decreases, as seen
through the lens of behavioral economics, may be futile as a value-oriented
“A copayment decrease is meant to
encourage people who aren’t taking a drug to take it,” Asch said. “But if I’m
not taking the drug, I never see a copayment decrease. I don’t even notice
that. I don’t go the drugstore. The whole problem is that I’m not going there,
so the copayment decrease can be invisible to me.
“That helps explain why
value-based insurance design is asymmetric. The effects of increasing costs are
much more potent than the effects of decreasing cost. We should just pay
attention to that as we think about these programs.”
As to whether behavioral economics
is better directed towards patients or toward clinicians, the evidence suggests
that the answer is: both.
Asch led a study
that consisted of four groups, each of which was seeking to achieve LDL
cholesterol reduction in patients: Physician incentives ($1,024 per patient who
achieved his or her cholesterol target after 12 months), patient incentives
($1,024 for achieving the target), shared incentives ($512 each to the
physician and patient for achieving the target), and a control group.
The results showed that patient
incentives or physician incentives alone did not produce significantly greater cholesterol
reduction than the control group. But shared incentives did boost results.
Asch noted that the effectiveness
of pay-for-performance models among physicians had never been examined before
that 2015 study. “It’s just always been assumed to work,” he said.
The results should not have been
surprising. “It was like we accidentally discovered the doctor-patient
relationship,” he said. “It takes two to tango. It takes a physician to
prescribe and a patient to take it, and in a lot of strategies to improve
health care, we target one or the other. We don’t think about using them
together. We’ve all been taught about the clinician-patient relationship and
how important it is. Why aren’t we using this effectively?”
The push to make health care more value-focused generally
hinges on the idea that by altering financial incentives for patients and
providers, policymakers can change behavior.
That approach, Asch said, is too reliant on standard
economics when behavioral economics offers more-targeted methods.
“From experience and frankly from common sense, just
dangling a financial incentive in front of a patient of in front of a hospital
or health system creates some motivation for change. But it doesn’t tell them
how to do it.
“It’s actually very hard to change your behavior if you’re a
patient. ‘I know I shouldn’t eat the potato chips. I didn’t need more
motivation. It’s just, how do I avoid them?’ And a hospital that’s used to
operating a certain way, it’s like turning a battleship—it’s not so easy to turn on a dime.
“These financial incentives that come from approaches to
value-based care are important because you want your incentives aligned, but I
don’t think they’re ever going to take us the full way. So we need to think
about what else we need to apply to be in concert with this. It has to be a
Nick Hut is
managing editor of Leadership.
for this article:
David Asch, MD, MBA, executive director, Penn Medicine for Health Care
This article is based in part on a presentation at HFMA's 2018 Thought Leadership Retreat.
R1 RCM: Partnering with Healthcare Organizations to Reimagine the Revenue Cycle
Two senior leaders at R1 talk about the advantages of working with an innovative revenue cycle partner that offers technology-enabled revenue cycle and patient experience services.
Grant Thornton: Helping Organizations Embrace Robotic Process Automation
Two senior leaders at Grant Thornton talk about the advantages of robotic process automation to improve office efficiency, reduce costs, and mitigate risk.
VitalWare: Creating a Transparency Strategy: Meeting the Mandate to Post Standard Hospital Pricing
A senior leader of VitalWare talks about the need to create a comprehensive pricing strategy for consumers and how to get started.
HealthTrust: Solving Workforce Management Challenges
Two of HealthTrust’s senior leaders talk about strategies for optimizing the hospital workforce to improve productivity and reduce waste.
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Building a Clinically-Integrated Network
As value-based payment models evolve, providers are challenged to maintain superior clinical outcomes while controlling costs.
Winning in the Post-Acute Marketplace
Read more about factors contributing to the changes in the post-acute marketplace and what it means for manufacturers, physicians, clinicians, patients, and post-acute facilities as they anticipate the transition to the second curve.
Building A Common Vision with Employed Physicians
HSG helped the physicians and executives of St. Claire Regional in Morehead, Kentucky, define their shared vision for how the group would evolve over the next decade. As well as, develop the strategic and operational priorities which refocused and accelerated the group’s evolution.
Practice Performance Improvement
The client was a nine-hospital health system with 14 clinics serving communities in a multi-state market with very limited access to care, poor economic conditions, high unemployment, and a heavy Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured payer mix. In most of these communities, the system was the sole source of care.
Though the clinics were of substantial size (they employed 98 physicians) and comprised of multiple specialists, the physicians functioned as individuals and the practices lacked any real group culture.
Clinical Integration Without Spending a Fortune
Clinical integration can be expensive, but it doesn’t have to be, as this four-step road map for developing a CIN proves. Does it have to cost millions to initiate a clinical integration strategy?
Contrary to popular belief, we have clients who have generated substantial shared savings and a significant ROI over time, without massive investments. Yes, some financial capital is required for resources the CIN providers can’t bring to the table themselves. But the size of that investment can be miniscule relative to the value it produces: improved outcomes and documentation for payers.
Adding Value to Physician Compensation
Today’s concerns about physician compensation are the result of the changing healthcare environment. The transition to value is slow, but finally becoming a reality. Proactive hospitals want to ensure that provider incentives are properly aligned with ever-increasing value-based demands.
This report focuses on the three big questions HSG receives about adding value to physician compensation; Why are organizations redesigning their provider compensation plans? What elements and parameters must be part of successful compensation plans? How are organizations implementing compensation changes?
Effective Revenue Cycle Management in Your Network
Revenue Cycle Management has become an even more complex issue with declining reimbursements, implementation of Electronic Health Records, evolving local carrier determinations (LCD), and payer credentialing [The emphasis on healthcare fraud, abuse and compliance has increased the importance of accuracy of data reporting and claims filing).
The efficiency of a medical practice’s billing operations has critical impact on the financial performance. In many cases, patient billings are the primary revenue source that pays staff salaries, provider compensation and overhead operating cost. Inefficiencies or inaccurate billing will contribute to operating losses.
Succeeding in Value-Based Care
This publication identifies and outlines the necessary characteristics of a fully-functioning clinically integrated network (CIN). What it doesn’t do is detail how hospitals and providers can participate in the value-based care environment during the development process.
One common misconception is that the CIN can’t do anything significant until it has obtained the FTC’s “clinically integrated” stamp of approval. While the network must satisfy the FTC’s definition of clinical integration before single signature contracting for FFS rates and contracts can legally start, hospitals and providers can enjoy three key benefits during the development process.
Therapy: Benefits at All Levels of Care
Nearly half of all Medicare beneficiaries treated in the hospital will need post-acute care services after discharge. For these patients, a stay in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility or other post-acute care setting comes between hospital and home.
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
With the proper process, tools, and feedback mechanisms in place, budgeting can be a valuable exercise for organizations while helping hold organizational leaders accountable. Having a proper monthly variance review process is one of the most critical factors in creating a more efficient and accurate budget. Monthly variance reporting puts parameters around what is to be expected during the upcoming budget entry process.
Cost Accounting: the Key to Cost Management and Profitability
Managing the cost of patient care is the top strategic priority of most hospital CFOs today. As healthcare shifts to more data-driven decision making, having clear visibility into key volume, cost and profitability measures across clinical service lines is becoming increasingly important for both long-range and tactical planning activities. In turn, the cost accounting function in healthcare provider organizations is becoming an increasingly important and strategic function. This whitepaper includes five strategies for efficient and accurate cost accounting and service line analytics and keys to overcoming the associated challenges.