Tools & Tips | Value-Based Payment

Medical Group Perspectives

Sponsored by Healthcare Strategy Group
Tools & Tips | Value-Based Payment

Medical Group Perspectives

A medical group’s perspectives on physician alignment and engagement opportunities can differ significantly based on the group’s demographics. Demographic categories include the group’s ownership status, type of group, performance and experience, and personality.  Common traits within these categories are shown in

A medical group’s perspectives on physician alignment and engagement opportunities can differ significantly based on the group’s demographics. Demographic categories include the group’s ownership status, type of group, performance and experience, and personality. 

Common traits within these categories are shown in the table below. 

Common Physician Group Demographics

Ownership Status  Type of Group Performance and Experience Personality
Independent/physician-owned Primary care group Stability Entrepreneurial
Hospital/health system-owned Single specialty group Financial performance Early adopter
  Multispecialty group Asset base Traditionalist
    Reputation Collaborative
    Price position Individualistic
    Relationships  

Different combinations of these traits will suggest different opportunities for engagement or alignment. For example: 

  • A primary care group with a strong reputation and collaborative personality that is seeking greater stability may be interested in seeking alignment with—and potentially acquisition by—a health system or larger multispecialty group. 
  • An independent single-specialty group with strong financial performance and an entrepreneurial personality may seek a joint venture or co-management relationship with a health system.
  • A health-system-owned multispecialty group may seek to develop stronger physician governance structures within the system.
  • An independent multispecialty group with a competitive price position and early adopter personality may seek to form an ACO with other provider organizations in its market.

A medical group’s perspective on alignment and engagement opportunities will be further shaped by its answers to such questions as: 

  • What opportunities are other medical groups pursuing, and why are they pursuing them?
  • How quickly is our market moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment?
  • How well positioned are we currently to manage the transition to value-based payment?
  • To what extent will we need to look at partners, co-investors, or others to help us get from here to there?
Next Page               Home               Previous Page
 

Advertisements

Related Articles | Value-Based Payment

News | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement

MedPAC backs Medicare changes to increase hospital pay in 2021 by up to 3.3%

For 2021, MedPAC has recommended that hospitals’ Medicare rates increase 2%, plus a potential 0.8% quality bonus and elimination of a 0.5% quality cut.

News | Medicaid Payment and Reimbursement

Jan. 20-24: MACPAC policy meeting among upcoming healthcare finance events

A complete listing of healthcare finance-related hearings, conferences, webinars, public forums and deadlines for the week of Jan. 20.

News | Bundled Payment

BPCI Advanced participation jumps by 57% in its third year

Provider participation in the largest Medicare voluntary bundled payment program surged in its third year.

Blog | Value-Based Payment

Analysis: Aspire Health Founder Brad Smith chosen as new CMMI director

The change in CMMI leadership could mean long-anticipated models are released, and may signal more emphasis on palliative care in future models based on Brad Smith’s background.