Live Webinar | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement
Live Webinar | Innovation and Disruption
Live Webinar | Patient Financial Communications
Live Webinar | Operations and Other Technology
Case Study | Revenue Cycle

Reducing bad debt at a comprehensive care center

Case Study | Revenue Cycle

Reducing bad debt at a comprehensive care center

Northwestern Medicine, an academic medical center serving the Chicago area, created and implemented a two-part improvement pilot in 2018. The pilot included discussing patients’ insurance benefits prior to the beginning of treatment in one intervention. It also included reaching out to patients who had outstanding balances to discuss the barriers to payment they were facing in the second intervention. In both interventions, patients were educated about common insurance terms, such as deductible and co-payment.


As a first step, the team reviewed bad debt trends and identified the highest opportunity areas. Oncology was identified as the third highest contributor to bad debt and the service line that had the greatest potential for improvement because the services with the highest cost are generally planned in advance. 

In baseline cases within oncology from September 2017 through February 2018, the team found that 50% of the bad debt came from just 2% of patients who had balances over $10,000. 

The team then performed retrospective chart review on 20 patients with the highest amount of bad debt to identify root causes and risk factors for accounts falling to bad debt. The variables explored were age, gender, treatment course, insurance type and network status. It was determined that the majority of the cost was from chemotherapy, and most of the patients were insured. Based on that analysis, the financial counseling and billing services interventions were developed.

Pilot design

The pilot, which included these two distinct interventions, was conducted between May and August 2018. Results are shown in the exhibit.

  1. Billing specialist pilot. For individuals with  outstanding balances, a billing specialist contacted the patient to discuss barriers to payment. Patients were offered assistance such as drug replacement and co-pay assistance programs, financial assistance and payment plans. Billing specialists also provided education regarding common terms such as deductible, copayment, coinsurance, deposit, estimate, out-of-network and out-of-pocket maximum.  
  2. Financial counseling pilot. In a parallel pilot, a proactive financial counseling intervention was conducted for all patients starting a new regimen of intravenous chemotherapy at one of Northwestern Medicine’s infusion centers. Financial counselors provided education regarding each patient’s insurance benefits as well as term definitions as provided in the other pilot. And those patients with a risk factor for bad debt (e.g., out of network, no prescription drug coverage) received more direct counseling to address their identified need. 

Table 1: Characteristics of patients in the billing and financial counseling intervention


Billing intervention (n= 255) Financial counseling intervention (n=277)
84 males (33%)
171 females (67%)
125 males (45%)
152 females (55%)
Mean Age 54 57

Malignancy type

Anemia/blood disorder 17 (7%) 18 (7%)
Brain 8 (3%) 15 (5%)
Breast 65 (25%) 21 (8%)
Colorectal 21 (8%) 29 (10%)
Genitourinary 9 (4%) 15 (5%)
Gynecologic 27 (11%) 16 (6%)
Head and Neck 10 (4%) 10 (4%)
Leukemia 14 (5%) 17 (6%)
Lung cancer 11 (4%) 21 (8%)
Lymphoma 16 (6%) 21 (8%)
Melanoma/other skin 7 (3%) 12 (4%)
Multiple myeloma 24 (9%) 35 (13%)
Other GI malignancy 7 (3%) 20 (7%)
Sarcoma 5 (2%) 11 (4%)
Unknown/other 14 (5%) 16 (6%)

Insurance type

Private 150 (59%) 137 (41%)
Medicaid only 47 (18%) 47 (17%)
Medicaid with supplement 15 (6%) 18 (6%)
Medicare only 15 (6%) 15 (5%)
Medicare with supplement 17 (7%) 49 (18%)
Veterans’ Health 3 (1%) 3 (1%)
Other 8 9 (3%)
Source: Northwestern Medicine


From May 1, 2018, until August 31, 2018, 532 unique patients were counseled at two separate infusion centers at Northwestern Medicine’s Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center. 

The outcomes of each counseling discussion are summarized in the exhibit on page page 24. In both interventions, the top three topics patients discussed or had questions about were related to:

  1. A specific bill
  2. The patient’s account balance
  3. Bills not submitted to insurance

In the billing intervention, the outcome was that 50% had a billing error corrected. Of those patients in the financial counseling intervention, 67% were referred to billing because they had a question/issue specifically involving billing. 

In the baseline period from September 2017 through February 2018, $560,648 (monthly average $93,441) in high-dollar balances were placed with bad debt vendors. During the intervention pilots’ time frames, $130,678 (monthly average $32,669) in high-dollar balances were placed with bad debt vendors. Therefore, there was a 65% reduction in monthly average bad debt placement in accounts greater than $10,000 from the baseline period to intervention period. 

Outcome of billing and financial counseling intervention

Billing specialists intervention

Total with outcome

Percent with outcome

Billing error corrected/ billed insurance/looking into insurance or verify insurance 127 50
Statement reviewed with patient/answered questions 76 30
Provided insurance with more information
Deposit collected
Financial assistance application taken or approved
Payment plan established/questions about existing payment plan 1 <1
Referred to financial navigator 5 2
Voicemail - Pending - Unable to reach  3 1
No outcome given/blank 19 7
Referred to another necessary department  (e.g., transplant) 2 <1

Financial counseling intervention

Total with outcome


Referred to billing liaison 186 67
Statement/insurance reviewed with patient/answered questions 45 16
Financial assistance application taken/approved, or payment plan set up 5 2
Referred to another necessary department (e.g., surgery, transplant, social worker) 6 2
Voicemail left/unable to reach 16 6
Miscellaneous/blank/no outcome given 19 7
Source: Northwestern Medicine    


These two parallel pilots demonstrate that it is feasible to implement routine financial counseling at a large academic institution with either a billing specialist or financial counselor. In both interventions, most of the questions and concerns of patients were related to either a specific bill, an error in billing, details of insurance coverage or their account balance. This information highlights the complexity of insurance billing. 

The fact that 50% of those in the billing intervention had an error corrected highlights that at least a portion of bad debt could be avoided or mitigated with a process for careful review of bad debt billing. 

Although this approach might not be feasible in a smaller facility, the Northwestern pilots show that intervention could have a positive influence on efforts to reduce bad debt. The team continues to look for ways to better understand patient and provider perspectives on this type of financial counseling intervention. 

The author would like to thank the following people for their contributions to this article:

Cassandra Davis, Manager Operations, Northwestern Medicine

Noam Davidoff, Program Director, Operations, Northwestern Medicine

Samantha Albergo, Manager, SBO Patient Accounting, Northwestern Medicine 

Tawana (Angel) Covington, Operations Coordinator, SBO Patient, Northwestern Medicine 

Stephanie Martin, Manager Financial Counseling, Northwestern Medicine

Connie Augustyniak, Practice Manager, Northwestern Medicine

Bijal Desai, Program Manager, Value-based Care, Northwestern Medicine 

Ariana Economos, Patient Access Coordinator, Northwestern Medicine

Robin Katz, Social Worker, Northwestern Medicine

Sandra Manley-Eichler, Social Worker, Northwestern Medicine 

Jessica Walradt, Manager, Value-based Care, Northwestern Medicine 

Mary Mulcahy MD, Professor, Northwestern Medicine

Al B. Benson, MD, Professor, Northwestern Medicine

Hannah Alphs Jackson, Director, Value-based Care, Northwestern Medicine

About the Author

Sheetal Kircher, MD,

is an associate professor at Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Sign up for a free guest account and get access to five free articles every month.


Related Articles | Revenue Cycle

Article | Revenue Cycle

Revenue Cycle Insights: May 2022

No Surprises Act implementation continues. Though arbitration cases are expected to be addressed in a slow fashion at first, there may be some related regulatory changes that favor providers, Nick Hut reports.

Revenue Cycle

A best-practice approach to coding, coding quality and compliance improves reimbursement

Healthcare providers need to ensure they are accurately paid for the care provided, and that starts with timely, correct and consistent coding. This critical revenue cycle process codifies the clinical care performed and documented.

Article | Denials Management

Strategic alternative dispute resolution offers providers key to substantial claim recoveries

To be able to effectively handle disputes over healthcare claims, providers must be well-informed about the two basic types of alternative dispute resolution that can help them achieve favorable results: arbitration and mediation.

How To | Cost Effectiveness of Health

Cost Effectiveness of Health Report, April 2022

The April 2022 edition of HFMA’s Cost Effectiveness of Health Report includes a preview the May issue of hfm, which focuses on telehealth, a key tool for promoting value-based care CEoH. Another article explores ways to promote health equity in revenue cycle processes, and a case study describes how one health system embarked on an initiative to achieve greater diversity among its revenue cycle staff.