On Demand Webinar | Basic | Patient Experience
In an era of increasing high deductibles, steady shifting of healthcare costs from payers to individuals not only intensifies pressure on patients' pocketbooks, but also changes their attitude toward payment. More than half of patients are ...
Save
Course | Intermediate | Patient Experience
In this course we will address the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey, patients' expectations as consumers, and the role revenue cycle team members plays in a patient's experience and satisfacti...
Save
News | Patient Experience

Search for federal funding driving surprise bill legislation: advisers

News | Patient Experience

Search for federal funding driving surprise bill legislation: advisers

  • An effort to garner federal savings to fund other healthcare programs is driving legislation to limit surprise bills.
  • The savings are driven by a rate-setting approach opposed by providers because it would give excess leverage to health plans.
  • The Trump administration is expected to stand behind its proposed requirement for hospitals to release rates negotiated with health plans.

A pitched battle in Congress this year over legislation to eliminate at least some surprise healthcare bills is driven by a search for funding for other federal healthcare programs, and the strength of that drive will determine if a bill is enacted this year, according to former congressional staff.

“In a time … that Congress is looking for savings to pay for certain kinds of spending, that will be an important factor” in the fate of surprise bill legislation, said Yvette Fontenot, a partner at consultancy Avenue Solutions and a former Obama administration official.

Among the surprise billing legislation under consideration, a measure approved by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee in July would provide $24.9 billion in 10-year savings according to an estimate of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The savings would generally come from reduced subsidies for Affordable Act marketplace plans as provisions of the bill drive down provider payments.

Different versions from multiple committees in the House of Representatives are expected to provide different projected savings amounts.

Fontenot said Congress was looking for such savings to pay for unrelated healthcare programs.

Rodney Whitlock, PhD, a vice president at McDermott + Consulting and a former Senate healthcare staffer said both the surprise bill legislation and a separate drug price reduction bill could provide “tens of billions of dollars,” or TOBOD in federal savings.

“You get excited because I can do some real policy with TOBOD,” Whitlock said at a media briefing also attended by Fontenot and sponsored by the Alliance for Health Policy.

Pushback from providers

But those projected federal savings also have fueled the provider opposition to the surprise bill legislation that take the approach of the Senate health committee bill. That approach would use benchmarks to set payments in such billing disputes, which providers fear would increase health plan leverage in their rate negotiations.

“We also know that when you have bills that are TOBOD, like drug pricing and surprise billing, not surprisingly you have people who don’t like that, so you see opposition to some of those bills,” Whitlock said.

The legislative battle over surprise bill legislation this fall will be between those who want such funds for other programs and those who don’t want to give up the funds, he said.

One complication is that federal legislators may offer to use those surprise bill projected savings to fund the so-called Medicare extenders—a package of programs for providers and other that need to be re-authorized every two years—or to pay for delaying a planned Medicaid pay cut, Fontenot said.

Outlook for release of negotiated rates

The Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System CY20 proposed rule would require all nonfederal hospitals to post online their gross charges and payer-specific negotiated charges.

Hospitals have raised a range of concerns about the proposal and expected to push for its withdrawal during the rule’s comment period. But that is unlikely to deter the Trump administration, said Fontenot. 

“My understanding is that there is very strong support within the administration for this type of policy, so my guess would be that it does get finalized in the final rule with limited changes made to it,” Fontenot said.

But Whitlock joined providers in questioning the proposal. Problems with the rule, he said, included confusion over what prices the rule requiring providers to post and how useful the information will be to consumers.

“For many consumers, knowing that can be incredibly irrelevant,” Whitlock said. “It’s not a panacea and people should be careful with anyone who is selling that it is.” 

About the Author

Rich Daly, HFMA senior writer/editor,

is based in the Washington, D.C., office. Follow Rich on Twitter: @rdalyhealthcare

Advertisements

Related Articles | Patient Experience

Article | Revenue Cycle

HFMA’s Digital Annual Conference continues July 15 and July 17 with more virtual education for healthcare finance professionals

HFMA's Digital Annual Conference continues July 15 and July 17 with sessions to help healthcare finance professionals handle revenue cycle and clinical care challenges amid the pandemic.

News | Coronavirus

How hospitals are trying to get patients to return amid COVID-19

Hospitals are using a variety of efforts — from television campaigns to patient outreach — to get patients to return for care.

Article | Cost Reduction

Virginia Mason Institute transformation expert says healthcare systems can reduce waste and improve their margins

Virginia Mason Institute’s Rhonda Stewart shares how healthcare systems can reduce costs and improve patient and worker metrics by eliminating waste.

News | Financial Leadership

Why healthcare organizations should adopt a transformational mindset coming out of COVID-19

As the healthcare industry starts to look beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, leaders should consider how they can go beyond recovery to transform their operations.