Tools & Tips | Value-Based Payment

Medical Group Perspectives

Sponsored by Healthcare Strategy Group
Tools & Tips | Value-Based Payment

Medical Group Perspectives

A medical group’s perspectives on physician alignment and engagement opportunities can differ significantly based on the group’s demographics. Demographic categories include the group’s ownership status, type of group, performance and experience, and personality.  Common traits within these categories are shown in

A medical group’s perspectives on physician alignment and engagement opportunities can differ significantly based on the group’s demographics. Demographic categories include the group’s ownership status, type of group, performance and experience, and personality. 

Common traits within these categories are shown in the table below. 

Common Physician Group Demographics

Ownership Status  Type of Group Performance and Experience Personality
Independent/physician-owned Primary care group Stability Entrepreneurial
Hospital/health system-owned Single specialty group Financial performance Early adopter
  Multispecialty group Asset base Traditionalist
    Reputation Collaborative
    Price position Individualistic
    Relationships  

Different combinations of these traits will suggest different opportunities for engagement or alignment. For example: 

  • A primary care group with a strong reputation and collaborative personality that is seeking greater stability may be interested in seeking alignment with—and potentially acquisition by—a health system or larger multispecialty group. 
  • An independent single-specialty group with strong financial performance and an entrepreneurial personality may seek a joint venture or co-management relationship with a health system.
  • A health-system-owned multispecialty group may seek to develop stronger physician governance structures within the system.
  • An independent multispecialty group with a competitive price position and early adopter personality may seek to form an ACO with other provider organizations in its market.

A medical group’s perspective on alignment and engagement opportunities will be further shaped by its answers to such questions as: 

  • What opportunities are other medical groups pursuing, and why are they pursuing them?
  • How quickly is our market moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment?
  • How well positioned are we currently to manage the transition to value-based payment?
  • To what extent will we need to look at partners, co-investors, or others to help us get from here to there?
Next Page               Home               Previous Page
 

Advertisements

Related Articles | Value-Based Payment

Blog | Population Health Management

Social distancing due to coronavirus may have unintentional negative effects on seniors aging in place

The unintentional physical and emotional suffering social distancing may cause at risk seniors who are sheltering in place, will also increase the total cost of care, putting further COVID-19-related pressure on participants in alternative payment models.

Blog | Value-Based Payment

Risk-based contracting in the time of coronavirus

The APM target prices/benchmarks are among the many policy issues beyond paying for surge capacity that CMS, commercial health plans and providers will need to work through in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak.

News | Value-Based Payment

March 23-27: CMS webinars are among a proliferation of online-only events in healthcare finance

A complete listing of healthcare finance-related hearings, conferences, webinars, public forums and deadlines for the week of March 23.

News | Value-Based Payment

March 16-20: CMS deadlines approach amid ongoing cancellations of healthcare finance events

A complete listing of healthcare finance-related hearings, conferences, webinars, public forums and deadlines for the week of March 16.