A woman broke down after she recognized her poor laboratory results among the set of eight numbers that a physician specialist wrote on a large whiteboard. She expressed concerns about how she would take care of her family during her medical treatment and how to cope with such overwhelming circumstances. The other seven patients in the room instantly chimed in, saying that they had been in the woman’s shoes and offered words of empathy and encouragement.
This isn’t a support group, although a casual observer might think so. It’s a shared medical appointment at the UC San Diego Health System, which treats multiple patients at the same time in a supportive group setting. When properly conceived and executed, shared medical appointments have the potential to better leverage existing resources, improve access to medical care, increase capacity and quality, enhance productivity, and strengthen a healthcare organization’s bottom line. The approach may also ease the looming primary care physician shortage. The United States will need approximately 52,000 more primary care physicians by 2025 to accommodate population growth, an increase in the number of senior patients, and newly insured patients as a result of coverage expansion through the Affordable Care Act, according to data reported in “Projecting U.S. Primary Care Physician Workforce Needs: 2010-2025,” Annals of Family Medicine.
Three active shared medical appointment programs are in place at UC San Diego for diabetes, liver disease, and HIV/AIDS, with other specialized groups planned for the future. In a group setting of eight to 14 patients, the physician tends to the medical needs of each patient one at a time. This is done in front of the entire group, with the support of a team of healthcare providers. Often, a portion of the exam involves the need for privacy, in which case the doctor and patient repair to an adjacent room. Patients are checked in by a medical assistant and sign a confidentiality agreement. The 90-minute session formally begins when the physician arrives. A facilitator—often a behaviorist, social worker, or nurse—helps lead the session and encourages discussion. A nurse takes medical notes and assists the physician. A scheduler is also available as needed.
“The result is that patients are no longer isolated by their chronic diseases,” says John Fontanesi, PhD, director of UC San Diego’s Center for Management Science in Health. It’s common for patients in shared medical appointments to report problems, such as tracking medications or controlling blood sugars, and for other patients to share how they also struggle with those issues and what they are doing to cope, he says.
Nina Krishun, RN, who spent eight years in human resources before switching to nursing, was chosen to be the facilitator for UC San Diego liver disease shared medical appointments, which include patients who are about to have a transplant or are recovering from one. “When the physician is done examining patients and is working on notes, I lead a group discussion. Most of the time, we talk about tips and tricks patients use related to lifestyle, exercise, diet, and goal-setting. Patients are so excited by the end of a session that they are exchanging phone numbers. That is what is so unique about the model; it creates a sense of community.”
Each shared medical appointment at UC San Diego differs based on the nature of the patient population and physician preferences. For example, the HIV/AIDS sessions have multiple races, ethnicities, genders, sexual orientations, and age ranges in the room. “The diversity of the group represents my real-life practice,” says Amy Sitapati, MD, who is nationally recognized for her work to improve the quality of life for people living with HIV.
The diabetes appointments, led by Steven V. Edelman, MD, an expert on diabetes education and founder of the not-for-profit organization Taking Control of Your Diabetes, have taken the opposite approach. “In choosing people for the shared medical appointments, I looked at all my patients and I separated out those with Type 1 diabetics from those with Type 2 and separated men from women. I also tried to pick people from the same age groups. The more homogenous the group, the more people are going to feel comfortable talking about sensitive issues,” he says.
Sitapati says the biggest challenge for her has been the complexity of her patients’ care. Her practice delivers primary care plus chronic disease management for conditions such as congestive heart failure, plus the HIV component. “The average patient is on at least seven medications, and we have at least 22 prevention activities we have to run through. So how do you get all those drugs and tests ordered and reconciled in 90 minutes with that many patients?”
Having said that, Sitapati says she “loves shared medical appointments” and believes the team approach in a group setting helps physicians efficiently deliver primary care.
Shared medical appointments may also deliver a higher quality of care than solo appointments. A 2001 study found that group visits reduced emergency department (ED) visits among seniors with chronic illness. Only 34.9 percent of group visit participants visited the ED at least once over a two-year period, compared to 52.4 percent of controls (Coleman E.A., et al, “Reducing Emergency Visits in Older Adults with Chronic Illness. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Group Visits,” Effective Clinical Practice, March-April 2001, vol. 4. no. 2, pp. 49-57).
In another 2007 study, expectant mothers assigned to group care were 33 percent less likely to have preterm births compared with those in standard care: 9.8 percent compared with 13.8 percent, with no differences in age, parity, education, or income (Ickovics, J.R., et al, “Group Prenatal Care and Perinatal Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, August 2007, vol. 110, no. 2, part 1, pp. 330–39).
And a five-year study in Italy found diabetic patients in group-visit programs had better control of their disease and took less medicine than those who had private appointments (Trento M., et al, “A 5-Year Randomized Controlled Study of Learning, Problem Solving Ability, and Quality of Life Modifications in People with Type 2 Diabetes Managed by Group Care,” Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 670–5).
One reason for these successful results is the high level of education patients receive, Edelman says. Patients share their experiences with their continuous glucose monitors, the features of their insulin pumps, and how they manage their exercise regimens.
Many patients also prefer shared medical appointments. Approximately 85 percent of Cleveland Clinic patients participating in the shared appointments canceled their future solo appointments in favor of shared visits. In addition, the percentage of patients rating their overall satisfaction with their physician visits as excellent was much higher for shared visits (75 percent) than for individual office visits with the same providers (63 percent).
The business case for shared medical appointments is one of capacity, says Zeev Neuwirth, MD, chief medical officer and senior vice president, Physician Services Group, Carolinas Healthcare System, which has also adopted shared medical appointments. “Your physicians are a limited resource. If they are able to see 12 patients in a shared appointment, and hold two shared appointments in a half-day session, they can literally double the number of patients they can see. This increases capacity, which allows for the ability to grow market share.”
Greater access to care is another competitive advantage, he says. Instead of a patient calling in for follow-up care and being told that the wait is eight weeks, the patient might be able to find a drop-in appointment that same afternoon.
The number of physicians conducting shared medical appointments more than doubled between 2005 and 2010, according to the American Academy of Family Physicians. In 2005, approximately 5.7 percent of family physicians implemented shared medical appointments, compared to 12.7 percent in 2010. Health systems that now offer group visits include Carolinas Healthcare System, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Cleveland Clinic, Kaiser Permanente, Sutter Health, and the Veterans Health Administration.
Despite this growth, shared medical appointments remain a challenge to implement. Healthcare providers can establish their own programs, but most will fail, Neuwirth says. “They are hard to put together and even harder to sustain, unless you know what you are doing. You need rigor in the process.” The following assessment tool is designed to assist providers in deciding whether shared medical appointments are a viable option for their facilities.
UC San Diego began by reaching out to physician leaders of every clinical area to identify physician champions for shared medical appointments. Without engaged physicians, no program can succeed.
A consulting firm that specializes in developing shared medical appointment programs helped UC San Diego apply an assessment tool with 16 weighted criteria in three major domains, including patient factors (e.g., a chronically ill population), staff factors (e.g., an enthusiastic physician sponsor) and organizational factors (e.g., strong administration support). Ten clinical areas were scored, and three priorities emerged—AIDS/HIV, diabetes, and liver disease. After the teams were assembled, the firm provided training and conducted mock shared appointments, with role-playing and practice for live sessions.
The following is an example of an assessment tool designed to assist providers in deciding whether shared medical appointments are a viable option for their facilities.
The program at UC San Diego has been a resounding success. However, shared medical appointments aren’t for everyone. Younger, healthy people may not find shared appointments beneficial. In addition, some medical conditions don’t require repeated follow-up appointments that are the basis for the shared medical appointment model. But for those with chronic conditions who can benefit from group education and interaction with others in a similar situation, shared appointments present golden opportunities.
Daniel Bouland, MD, MS, is vice chair for clinical operations, Department of Medicine, UC San Diego Health System.Richard Siegrist, MBA, MS, CPA, is president & CEO, Cambria Health, Concord, Mass.
McKesson: Leveraging Predictive Analytics to Rein in Operating Costs
A leader from McKesson discusses how healthcare reform is forcing hospitals and health systems to take a different approach to capacity management and patient flow.
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
Accretive Health: Partners with Providers to Excel in a Rapidly Transforming Revenue Cycle Environment
Emad Rizk, MD, president and CEO of Accretive Health, discusses the uncertainty facing hospitals and the transitions affecting revenue cycle management.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Conifer Health Solutions: Helping Providers and Employers Build a Foundation for Better Health
Jim Bohnsack, vice president, solution & corporate development for Conifer Health Solutions, explains how the company helps healthcare providers leverage data to deliver better outcomes while optimizing reimbursement for all payment arrangements.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
Ontario Systems: Optimizing Accounts Receivable in a Rapidly Changing Environment
Steve Scibetta, senior director of channel sales for Ontario Systems' healthcare product line, shares insights into effectively managing receivables.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Optum: Enabling Transformative Change
Elena White, vice president of risk, quality, and network solutions for Optum, discusses how healthcare providers can leverage data and technology as they enable risk in their organization.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Somnia: Bending the Healthcare Cost Curve Toward Improved Anesthesia Value
Somnia President and CEO Marc Koch, MD, MBA, explains how hospitals can drive transformative change in the perioperative experience for outstanding clinical and financial outcomes.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
PMMC: Navigating Revenue Cycle Management Challenges as Value Based Purchasing Emerges
PMMC President Roger L. Shaul discusses the effects of healthcare reform on revenue cycle management and how PMMC's products help clients adapt to a changing financial environment.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Burgess: Simplify the Business of Healthcare
Greg Burgess, Founder and Chief Product Officer at Burgess Group shares insights and opportunities for payment integrity in the rapidly changing healthcare IT landscape.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.