By Lola Butcher
As electronic health record (EHR) technology spreads quickly across the healthcare industry, providers are developing a wide range of clinical decision support tools-such as electronic alerts, order sets, protocols, and smart documentation forms-to improve and standardize clinical care.
For instance, at Southeast Texas Medical Associates, clinical decision support helps physicians at the multidisciplinary clinic comply with more than 250 quality measures, with physician performance on each measure reported on the clinic's website. "Once you open the books to public reporting, the only place you have to hide is in excellence," says James L. Holly, MD, the practice's CEO.
In addition to the purchase and implementation of EHR technology, a successful clinical decision support program requires continuous monitoring and updating, which means an ongoing commitment of staff and financial resources. But, within a matter of years, physicians and health systems that do not use clinical decision support will find themselves unable to offer the quality of care that will become routine because of the technology.
The investment is money well spent, says Matthew Eisenberg, MD, medical vice president-clinical informatics at MultiCare Health System, which is considered one of the more sophisticated clinical decision support users in the country. "Quality prints money," he says. "We have seen our length of stay decrease and we have fewer adverse events. That translates into good, solid financial success for our organization."
Eisenberg defines clinical decision support this way: Providing clinicians and patients with clinical knowledge and patient-related information that is intelligently filtered and presented at appropriate times to enhance patient care and improve clinical outcomes (see the exhibit below).
Clinical decision support is possible because of EHR technology, but EHR systems do not automatically include clinical decision support functions. "There are two ways that you can use an EHR: You can use it as a big, fancy typewriter and file cabinet, or you can actually leverage the information to improve the quality of care, improve patient safety, and improve efficiencies," says Timothy C. Birdsall, ND, FABNO, chief medical information officer, Cancer Treatment Centers of America.
The following case studies highlight the various ways that progressive organizations are using clinical decision support to improve quality and reduce costs.
Building templates to support preventive care. Recognized as a patient-centered medical home, Southeast Texas Medical Associates' 24 physicians and 265 other staff have access to an EHR system in each of the practice's five clinics as well as four hospitals, 28 nursing homes, and anywhere else they have an Internet connection.
Clinical decision support-screening tools, reminders, templates, and order sets-guide virtually every patient interaction. For instance, before an outpatient visit, a nurse uses a pre-visit screening tool to identify preventive care needs. In addition, Southeast Texas' disease-specific clinics for diabetes, congestive heart failure, and other conditions are all supported by template-driven disease management tools. These help physicians and nurses provide consistent, evidence-based monitoring, treatment, and coaching for patients with these medical conditions.
Age-specific benchmarks built into the EHR system alert clinicians if, for example, a child is overweight and this information helps all members of the care team give consistent information as they coach patients and their parents on creating healthy habits. Meanwhile, EHR templates and order sets help ensure that women get appropriate gynecological exams and other needed tests.
"We transformed our vision to focus less on how many X-rays and lab tests are done and to focus more on ensuring that patient care meets measurable standards of excellence and on taking actions to reduce the cost of care," says CEO James L. Holly, MD.
The multidisciplinary practice, in Beaumont, Texas, is supported by a six-member IT department. It has spent $8 million on EHR technology since 1999, says Holly. Of that, at least $3 million went to building and deploying clinical decision support. The pay-off: The practice has achieved significant results, including the following:
Using "hard stops" to improve outpatient care. None of the 93 cardiologists practicing at Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia would fail to prescribe a beta-blocker to a heart attack patient, if appropriate-because their EHR system would not allow it.
The system is embedded with quality checking algorithms for nine indicators of good cardiac care. As a physician documents in the EHR during a patient visit, he or she is flagged to address the indicators relevant to that patient's condition. The program will not advance to the next screen until the physician has either indicated compliance with the quality measure or explained the reason for not doing so.
"These are absolute hard stops," said Scott E. Hessen, MD, the practice's chief medical information officer. "You cannot bypass them."
Cardiology Consultants introduced these clinical decision support functions in 2007 shortly after implementing its EHR system. Hessen and his colleagues recognized that merely documenting the care being provided did not support compliance with evidence-based guidelines, such as the use of anti-platelet therapy in coronary artery disease or warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation.
"To get a report card after you have seen a year's worth of patients-and find out that you got a 'C'-doesn't really help you improve," he says.
Hessen, who programmed the clinical decision support features for the practice, said it was easy to get his colleagues' support because he proposed starting with six quality measures backed by so much evidence that no one disagreed about their worth. "All of our doctors agreed because they knew absolutely that they would score at least 97 percent or better on all the measures," he says. "And then, after this went live, they were shocked to find out that they didn't score 97 percent on all these measures."
The lower-than-expected scores did not reflect poor care but rather a lack of systematic documentation of why an evidence-based protocol was not appropriate for a given patient. "More often than not, there's a very good reason, but insurers don't know what that reason is. All they can see is, 'You've only got 80 percent of your patients on a beta blocker so you must be doing a marginal job,'" Hessen says. "Now we have documentation to counter with, 'We have every patient on a beta blocker who needs one, or here's the reason why some patients are not on them.'"
In addition to finding favor with insurers, Cardiology Consultants receives annual bonus checks from the federal government for its participation in the Physician Quality Reporting System. Plus, it earned a meaningful use incentive check in the first year of that program- thanks, in part, to clinical decision support functions.
Over time, three additional quality measures have been added for a total of nine "hard stops." Obviously, they don't all apply to each diagnosis, and the EHR displays only those that are relevant for a specific patient's situation. For example, if a patient is a non-smoker, the smoking-cessation advice hard-stop screen does not appear.
"People shouldn't be afraid of a hard stop or two because their value after the fact is incredible," Hessen says.
Standardizing care in a stand-alone hospital. As a participant in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI's) Impacting Cost + Quality initiative, King's Daughters Medical Center set a goal of reducing its annual operating budget by 1 percent, or $6 million. The biggest share of that savings is coming from clinical effectiveness bundles, or evidence-based EHR order sets and care plans for cardiac surgery, total joint replacements, heart failure, and other common procedures and diagnoses.
IHI defines a bundle this way: A small set of evidence-based interventions for a defined patient segment/population and care setting that, when implemented together, will result in significantly better outcomes than when implemented individually. IHI's central line bundle includes five interventions:
Angela Graham, RN, director of quality outcomes, King's Daughters, said the most important part of creating a clinical effectiveness bundle is fixing the broken processes that are responsible for waste. "You have to walk through each step that the patient has to go through and ask, 'Does it lend value? Is the process the best that we can make it?'" she said. "The goal is to get as close to perfect as you can."
The bundles concept is a very good approach to reducing unwarranted variation in clinical practices, says Katharine Luther, RN, vice president of IHI's hospital portfolio planning and administration. "We know that variation in practice is one of the single biggest drivers of cost and a contributor to poor quality. These bundles can also be a time-saver for clinicians, organizing their work and allowing them to spend time on adapting and individualizing care for patients."
In the first 18 months of its initiative, King's Daughters, a 465-bed hospital in Ashland, Ky., saved nearly $2.1 million by implementing clinical effectiveness bundles for 13 common conditions. In addition, the medical center improved patient satisfaction and started to win buy-in from some recalcitrant physicians who were not on board at the program's inception.
"Our physicians, just by nature, are extremely competitive," says Graham. "So when we tell Dr. B that Dr. A is using the bundle and that his results are better, they instinctively want to start using it."
To create these bundles, Graham assembles a multidisciplinary team, including physicians, case managers, pharmacists, nurses, physical therapists, and other relevant staff to discuss how the current processes compare to evidence-based best practices. Physicians are recruited to help create the order sets that will drive the new care process. Each physician's performance on an array of measures specific to the clinical effectiveness bundle-for example, percentage of medications prescribed that are not on the order set, length-of-stay, and cost per case-is monitored on a dashboard.
Using clinical decision support to save lives. In a bid to reduce death from sepsis, MultiCare, a four-hospital system based in Tacoma, Wash., has developed a standardized approach to sepsis management. Unlike typical order sets for a given diagnosis, these orders are issued in a step-wise fashion that reflects changes in a patient's health status. Each time the patient's clinical parameters are updated in the EHR, an algorithm determines the next step in the care plan.
"You place some orders, see how your patient is progressing and, based on that status, you go in and place additional orders," Eisenberg says. "We've seen a substantial drop in our sepsis mortality, and this is really helping to be a differentiator in terms of our ability to deliver quality care."
Similarly, the health system developed an order set to standardize its approach to the intravenous use of heparin, a high-risk anticoagulant that is often associated with medication errors and complications. After implementing the order set, MultiCare saw medication errors decrease and associated costs decline.
"This is an important collaboration with our pharmacists because there's an opportunity to co-manage these patients through the pharmacy, with nurses monitoring to make sure patients are safely treated with intravenous heparin," Eisenberg says.
MultiCare is one of the more advanced clinical decision support users in the country, with an inventory that includes:
Clinical decision support, along with other EHR features, has helped MultiCare decrease its average length of stay from 4.32 days in 2006 to 3.85 days currently, says Vince Schmitz, the system's CFO.
Based on their experience, the four providers featured in this article offer the following tips for launching clinical decision support.
Don't look for off-the-shelf products. Because clinical decision support is based on evidence-based guidelines, it may be tempting to think that one health system's clinical decision support can be used by another. However, national best practice guidelines are built on varying levels of evidence. So each health system must set its own standards. "In some instances, there's pretty clear evidence, and it's pretty easy," Eisenberg says. "But if there's a gap in the evidence, you still have to get people in a room to agree: 'What's our best practice?'"
Another barrier: Clinical decision support functions have to be programmed to work in each health system's EHR. "This is not yet even close to plug-and-play," he says.
Plan ahead to avoid user fatigue. One of the most common clinical decision support functions is alerts and warnings related to drug/drug interactions. The information for that functionality comes from proprietary pharmacy databases. Rules within the EHR system grade the severity of the drug/drug interaction and identify the level of evidence that supports a concern. "If you don't filter out nuisance drug/drug interactions, you have a tremendous problem with alert fatigue," Eisenberg says. The drug databases are updated every month, so reviewing and filtering drug/drug interactions requires ongoing work.
Hessen at Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia says "click fatigue" is also a problem. "What the doctors loathe the most is the fact that you have to sit there and endlessly click, click, click," he says. "Our lesson is you have to minimize the clicks whenever possible. You have to automate as many things as can be automated."
Make life easy for clinicians-and patients. Whenever possible, clinical decision support tools should be context-sensitive to the patient. When a patient visits a MultiCare primary care office, the EHR screen will alert clinicians to that patient's individual health maintenance requirements-screenings, immunizations, and medication prevention, such as aspirin therapy-based on the recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
The list can be provided to the patient via MultiCare's patient portal, the patient's personal health record, or a printed after-visit summary. "This is a great example of where the information is personalized for that patient," Eisenberg says. "If a patient has had a mammogram, that should be off the list. If she has not and it is due, that should be indicated-specifically for her."
Providing patient decision support. Southeast Texas' most innovative use of clinical decision support may be the functions that help patients make decisions about their health habits. Shortly after the medical home introduced its EHR system in 1999, Holly recognized that its power would only be realized if the practice moved to electronic patient management. That meant designing disease management and population health tools, including follow-up documents for patients that summarize the patient's health goals and the steps needed to achieve them.
Holly's favorite example: the use of Framingham Cardiovascular Stroke Risk Assessment tool to help patients understand their risks of a heart attack or stroke within the next decade-and how they can reduce those risks. At each patient visit, the EHR system runs 12 Framingham calculations, including one that compares a patient's "relative heart age" based on his or her health factors with the patient's "real heart age." The system then automatically creates a report that shows "what if" scenarios that help a patient understand how lifestyle changes can decrease his or her risk.
For example, if a 45-year-old man with several risk factors has a "relative heart age" of 80, his 10-year risk is 30 percent. The report shows that, if he improves his blood pressure and other modifiable risk factors by 20 percent, his risk drops to 18.4 percent.
Another innovation: Southeast Texas' LESS (Lose Weight, Exercise and Stop Smoking and/or Avoid Second-Hand Smoke) initiative. Using a template-driven process, nurses use the EHR to calculate six metrics to assess each patient's weight-related health risks at every visit (unless the patient was seen in the previous two months). The system automatically creates a customized exercise "prescription" and, if necessary, an electronic "tickler file" that alerts care coordinators to follow up with a patient about his or her progress in quitting smoking.
Results: While the nation's obesity crisis has worsened in the past decade, the average body mass index for Southeast Texas patients has remained stable during that time, and the percentage of patients who are overweight increased by less than 1 percent.
Boil down the information. Southeast Texas Medical Associates boiled down the National Kidney Foundation's 460-page summary of renal disease into a few clinical decision support tools. And it used the American Medical Association's 220-page adult weight management notebook to create two support options: a full version that might take 30 minutes to complete and a short version that takes only one minute.
"The mistake would be to assume that, unless the entire evidence-based information is used every time, it does not have value," Holly says.
He encourages those who are not yet using clinical decision support to extend that thinking to the task ahead. "Many people are kind of dismayed by the hugeness of rolling out clinical decision support," he says. "Just accept the fact that maybe you can't do it all at first, but you can get started."
Introducing and maintaining clinical decision support requires careful planning and adequate management resources, says pioneers.
Managing tool development. Whether it's a template, an order set, or an alert, any poorly designed clinical decision support function is worse than none at all. A multidisciplinary team of clinicians, operational leaders, and IT specialists must collaborate. The process includes many steps: analyzing workflow, building the feature, testing it, communicating about it, and more. "You need to follow mature project management processes, and you can't do this on the cheap," Eisenberg says.
As much as possible, the development process should consider how new clinical support-driven processes will affect the cost of care. For example, the first year after Southeast Texas Medical Associates implemented a screening tool to identify patients who needed immunizations, it spent an extra $1 million in buying vaccines. "Because many of those are given every 10 years, that initial investment paid off in the next nine years as the costs dropped dramatically," Holly says.
Working with physicians. The physicians who helped create the clinical effectiveness bundles used at King's Daughters are enthusiastic about their benefits, but other physicians have proved difficult to deal with. "They felt like it was cookie-cutter medicine-that's the terminology that they used quite often," Graham says.
Getting competing orthopedic practices to agree on an order set and care plan proved particularly difficult. Development of the bundles was driven by hospital management, but reaching a consensus ultimately had to be delegated to physicians. "We said, 'We expect you to create this because it is yours, and you are going to be the ones using it. How can we make it easy and better?" she says.
On the other hand, King's Daughters underestimated the engagement of some physician groups who were eager to see how the clinical effectiveness bundles affected their care. "They immediately said, 'Where are my results? I want to see how I'm doing,'" she says. "And we didn't have the results ready right off the bat. So that was a big lesson learned for us."
MultiCare has nearly 500 inpatient and emergency department order sets, plus additional sets for outpatient care, and all of these must be updated when new guidelines and best practices emerge. "Having a governance structure and a process for doing that is important," Eisenberg says. "The work doesn't stop after implementation. And it takes a lot of time and effort."
He monitors the use of order sets to identify any that are not being used. That may indicate that work is needed to inform clinicians of the availability or value of the order sets-or it may indicate that they need to be removed. For example, MultiCare is retiring some neonatology order sets that are rarely used because physicians have saved the orders on a "personal preference list" in the EHR system. "It's kind of like a tree-you have to keep taking care of it and some limbs need to be trimmed back so that the order set catalog is alive, thriving, and used," he says.
Access related sidebar: Preparing for Mobile Clinical Decision Support
Lola Butcher is a freelance writer and editor based in Missouri.
Interviewed for this article (in order of appearance):
James L. Holly is CEO, Southeast Texas Medical Associates, Beaumont, Texas (Jholly@setma.com).
Matthew A. Eisenberg, MD, is medical vice president for clinical informatics, MultiCare Health System, Tacoma, Wash. (Matthew.Eisenberg@multicare.org).
Timothy C. Birdsall, ND, FABNO, is chief medical information officer, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Schaumburg, Ill. (email@example.com).
Scott E. Hessen, MD, is chief medical information officer, Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia, Philadelphia. (ScottH@ccpdocs.com).
Angela Graham, RN, is director of quality outcomes, King's Daughters Medical Center, Ashland, Ky. (Angie.Graham@kdmc.net).
Katharine Luther, RN, vice president of IHI's hospital portfolio planning and administration, Cambridge, Mass. (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Ontario Systems: Maximizing Self Pay Collections
The Claro Group: Helping Hospitals and Healthcare Systems Improve the Bottom Line
Deloitte: Helping Organizations Navigate MACRA
ClearBalance: Boosting Patient Payment through Consumer-Friendly Loan Programs
Deloitte Consulting LLP: Employing Innovative Solutions to Optimize Revenue Cycle Performance
Grant Thornton LLP: Maintaining and Improving Collections During an EMR Implementation
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.