In the not-too-distant past, healthcare leaders in the midst of constructing a new facility may have decided against adding too many windows in patient areas because of the additional cost. Today, many organizations are deliberately spending more on additional windows because natural light has been shown to improve the healing process—and reduce length of stay and associated costs.
Welcome to patient-centered facility design, which incorporates research on architectural and engineering approaches that positively affect patient outcomes. Patient-centered design is a part of evidence-based design, which also incorporates staff-efficient and energy-efficient features, says Ellen Taylor, director of research, The Center for Health Design, a Concord, Calif., not-for-profit.
“Like treating a patient with evidence-based medicine, we should be designing facilities around the best available information and what we know works, especially when integrated with operational and clinical policies and procedures,” Taylor says.
Indeed, a growing body of research has demonstrated the impact of patient-centered design on clinical outcomes. A 2008 literature review highlights numerous studies showing a strong correlation between reduced hospital-acquired infections and such design elements as large, single patient rooms and improved indoor air quality (Zimring, C.M., et al, “A Review of the Research Literature on Evidence-Based Healthcare Design,” Health Environment Research & Design, 2008, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 61-125).
Evidence-based design is also proving to be good business. A 2011 analysis found that incorporating evidence-based design elements into a 300-bed hypothetical hospital—including patient-centered features like healing gardens, sound-absorbing materials, and large windows—added an additional $26.2 million to the cost of construction. However, an ROI was achieved in just three years, due to cost savings from reductions in patient falls, lengths of stay, and energy use (see the exhibits below).
“From an investment perspective, if I was a CFO and I was getting a positive return on my facility in three years, I would be pretty happy,” Taylor says.
Built in the 1920s, the New Jersey-based University Medical Center of Princeton at Plainsboro (UMCPP), which is part of Princeton HealthCare System, had been added onto many times over the years. But it still could not meet the technology, service, and care delivery demands of the 21st century.
“Each addition made sense at the time. But if you keep adding on for 60 or 70 years, it doesn’t make any sense by the time you’re done. There was no logic to the layout, and it was extremely inefficient, which gets in the way of creating value and reducing the cost of operations,” says Barry Rabner, president and CEO, Princeton HealthCare System.
In 2003, the health system embarked on creating an entirely new facility. To guide decision making for virtually every aspect of design and construction, Princeton HealthCare System leaders developed a set of principles that focus on goals such as reducing complications, improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, and reducing operating costs. “The principles are almost all about issues that matter to patients,” Rabner says.
The new 630,000-square-foot facility, which opened in May 2012, features many elements that center on improving clinical outcomes and the patient experience. For example, off the hospital’s main lobby, east/west corridors feature all-glass walls that allow natural light to flow in. The hospital’s centers of care are located off these corridors, and most of the services required for each type of care (such as chemotherapy for cancer treatment) are clustered together for easy patient access.
In addition, nursing stations are decentralized, allowing nurses quicker access to patients. “That’s a very patient-centered way of organizing services,” Rabner says.
Designing patient-centered rooms. The best examples of patient-centered design can be found in the 231 private patient rooms, which include various patient safety features and were designed to be virtually identical. “Throughout the building, there’s a huge amount of standardization in design to help reduce medical errors,” Rabner says.
To test and prepare for the new design, two rooms in the old hospital facility were transformed into functional model rooms for the new facility. The model rooms were in operation for about one year. Based on what was learned, about 300 changes were made to the design of patient rooms in the new facility, including:
Even the televisions in patient rooms serve multiple duties. The flat-screen monitors, which are attached to the wall opposite the bed, can be used for viewing entertainment as well as health-education programming, such as videos on hip replacement rehabilitation. The computer also periodically asks patients to rate their pain levels. If the patient is experiencing too much pain, the computer will notify the patient’s nurse directly through a device carried by the nurse. Plus, physicians can access imaging tests from the monitors to show patients their results.
Achieving improvement. The health system has experienced significant improvements in clinical and financial metrics since opening the new hospital in 2012. A host of factors, from better employee training on policies and procedures to new technology, have contributed to these results. But, Rabner says, patient-centered design has played a significant role.
UMCPP now has one of the lowest fall rates, infection rates, and 30-day avoidable readmissions in the state (see the exhibit). Patients also like what they see. UMCPP patient satisfaction (as measured by an independent consulting firm) for overall inpatient services reached the 99th percentile in its New Jersey hospital peer group and near the 90th percentile nationally—the highest scores in the hospital’s history. In 2011, the year before moving into the new facility, UMCPP ranked in the 61st percentile in patient satisfaction in its New Jersey peer group.
In addition, inpatient volume has risen significantly, along with increases in outpatient volumes. Equivalent admissions, which combines inpatient and outpatient services, increased by 6.8 percent from 2012 to 2013. Three-quarters of hospitals statewide saw a decrease in equivalent admissions during the same time period, according to the New Jersey Hospital Association.
Rallying community support. To fund the project, Princeton HealthCare System held a three-year capital campaign that garnered $171 million, about one-third of the project’s $447 million cost and more than three times the targeted goal of $55 million. The remaining capital came from the sale of the old hospital facility, health system savings, operating funds, and issuance of tax-exempt bonds, Rabner says. In addition to the sale of the former hospital, Princeton HealthCare System sold a former skilled nursing facility and several medical office buildings.
Engaging the community and raising funds required two years’ worth of community meetings that centered around explaining the need for a new hospital facility in a new location. Many individual donors touted the amount of planning and intended use of patient-centered and evidence-based design as reasons for support, Rabner says.
Gaining the support of community members by welcoming and listening to feedback was invaluable. “They felt that they were partners with us,” Rabner says.
Expecting a return. Rabner and his financial team have not calculated the cost premium associated with the patient-centered features of the new facility. “However, we definitely expect an ROI on the design decisions that we made,” he says.
The guiding principles that were used in all decision making proved helpful in differentiating what would bring the fastest ROI. “We prioritized those items that we believed would pay for themselves within three years,” he says. “We rejected any design elements that would take 15 years or more to recoup the cost.”
Opened in October 2011, the UW Health Yahara Clinic, Monona, Wis., replaced two older clinic facilities within the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics (UW Health).
The new 32,000-square-foot facility, which UW Health rents for its employed family medicine physicians, includes several features that have helped improve both patient flow and staff workflow, which have led to improved patient satisfaction scores and clinical outcomes.
Removing the wait. A unique feature of the Yahara Clinic is the patient self-rooming process, which is designed to reduce patient waiting times, enhance privacy, and improve staff efficiency. When patients arrive for a physician appointment, rather than going to a waiting room, they proceed directly to an exam room, explains Deborah Lovik-Kuhlemeir, clinic operations manager.
Each exam room has two doors—one accessed from the public corridor used by patients and another back-of-the-clinic door accessed by clinical staff. When the patient is on his way to the room, the receptionist notifies the appropriate caregiver via a note in the EHR and by activating a red light over the room the patient is going to. The caregiver then proceeds to the exam room, as well.
Because the reception area and exam rooms are designed as a hub-and-spoke system, the receptionist can see down all corridors and note when a patient needs help locating a room.
“Patients like it. It does work,” Lovik-Kuhlemeier says.
For the patient, self-rooming reduces wait times and protects privacy by eliminating the possibility of seeing familiar faces in a waiting room. Healthy patients are also kept at a safer distance from unhealthy patients than would be the case if both were sitting in a waiting room.
For the healthcare organization, the approach improves efficiency. Caregivers or other staff do not have to spend time escorting patients, and the exam can begin as soon as the caregiver enters the room. “It’s set up very efficiently,” Lovik-Kuhlemeier says.
Because the clinical workstation area is located near the exam rooms, workflow has improved, as well. The distance from clinical staff workstations to exam rooms has improved by 83 percent compared to the design of the old facilities, according to a study conducted by the design firm (The Center for Health Design, Evidence-Based Design in Practice: Healthcare Design Case Studies from EDAC Champion and Advocate Firms 2014).
Huddling for care. The clinical work station’s proximity to exam rooms means clinical staff, such as medical assistants, are within easy access to physicians. In the old facilities, if physicians needed a medication or some other supply during an exam, they would have had to leave the room and then locate an assistant. Now, they can easily call for an assistant without leaving the room.
“It’s giving me more time to focus on the patient,” says Sandy Kamnetz, MD, vice chair of clinical care for the department of family medicine for the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.
The off-stage/on-stage design also allows for huddle areas, or places away from patients where a small group of clinicians can collaborate in brief sessions to discuss clinical matters, such as schedules, quality improvement projects, or population health management. For example, every week or two, Kamnetz huddles with her team— a nurse and a medical assistant—to review her patients to determine who is not meeting care goals and who is not following up with appropriate care, such as blood tests. The team then discusses possible roadblocks the patient may be facing and strategizes on the appropriate course of action.
At the old facilities, huddles were not possible to do privately and consistently because work stations were in patient-accessible areas. “If we were in our old building, we couldn’t have that discussion in the same space where we worked,” Kamnetz says. “We’d have to schedule that time in another part of the clinic. The new building gives us a space that allows us to work more closely in teams.”
Improving outcomes. The patient-centered design has contributed to more satisfied and healthier patients. Yahara’s patient satisfaction scores have increased by 25 percent since the opening of the new facility.
Patient diabetic measures and hypertension controls have improved, as well. Kamnetz attributes part of the improved clinical outcomes to process changes within UW Health, “But I think the ability for us to huddle makes improvement easier,” Kamnetz says.
Healthcare leaders offer advice on incorporating patient-centered features into new facilities:
Hold a boot camp. Implementing patient-centered design requires a barrage of decision making for which most hospital leaders are ill-prepared. Princeton HealthCare System president and CEO Barry Rabner says project professionals—architects, designers, and contractors—should hold a boot camp for all leaders of the hospital before the decision making begins. This group should include the board, medical staff directors (such as the chairman of surgery), and other senior administrators, such as the chief executive, financial, and nursing officers.
The boot camp should provide a clear understanding of the role of everyone on the design team, the financial implications of decision making, and any operational changes that may be needed to prepare the organization, Rabner says. For example, Princeton HealthCare System hired a government affairs expert because of all the approvals required by municipal agencies for the new facility.
Design for the future. As the importance of population health management intensifies, clinics should include spaces that foster care coordination, says Kamnetz. Caregivers should be able to easily gather in work areas to discuss patient progress, roadblocks, and solutions. These spaces are also used for education of the team and learners, such as medical students.
Space should also be flexible. Offices should hold dual purposes, for example, as private work space for physicians and as places where case managers can meet with patients and social workers.
Realize the value. Although healthcare organizations have recognized the clinical benefits of patient-centered design, Taylor says they are only beginning to calculate the direct financial implications. The growing payer focus on value and quality is causing organizations to gain a clearer understanding of the “costs” of suboptimal care on their bottom lines.
“If I renovate my semi-private rooms to private rooms, I may know that I’m going to have an increase in satisfaction. I’m likely going to have a reduction in hospital-associated infections. I’m going to have reduced noise level. These are all positive things, but as an organization, I may not take the time to put the dollar numbers on it,” she says.
Healthcare staff must understand how healthcare delivery is evolving as payment models change— and how these changes are affecting their workplaces and workspaces. Healthcare providers are designing their facilities to better serve patients by, for example, locating exam rooms closer to clinical work areas so physicians have easier access to their staff and needed supplies.
“Health care is changing rapidly, and if we don’t change along with it, we’re going to be left in the dust,” says Lovik-Kuhlemeier. “And that will end up affecting your business.” Whether through presentations given by change experts, articles in internal newsletters, or seminars, staff should be educated on the need to adapt and what form that may take.
Karen Wagner is a freelance healthcare writer and editor who contributes regularly to HFMA publications.
Interviewed for this article: Deborah Lovik-Kuhlemeier is clinical operations manager, UW Health Yahara Clinic, Monona, Wis. Deborah.Sandy Kamnetz, MD, is vice chair of clinical care for the Department of Family Medicine, and clinical professor, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Monona, Wis. Barry Rabner is president and CEO, Princeton HealthCare System, Plainsboro, N.J. Ellen Taylor, AIA, MBA, EDAC, is director of research, The Center for Health Design, Concord, Calif.
TriMedx: Elevating and Streamlining Clinical Engineering
TriMedx helps health systems control costs and uncover savings opportunities by optimizing the clinical engineering function.
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
McKesson: Leveraging Predictive Analytics to Rein in Operating Costs
A leader from McKesson discusses how healthcare reform is forcing hospitals and health systems to take a different approach to capacity management and patient flow.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Accretive Health: Partners with Providers to Excel in a Rapidly Transforming Revenue Cycle Environment
Emad Rizk, MD, president and CEO of Accretive Health, discusses the uncertainty facing hospitals and the transitions affecting revenue cycle management.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
Conifer Health Solutions: Helping Providers and Employers Build a Foundation for Better Health
Jim Bohnsack, vice president, solution & corporate development for Conifer Health Solutions, explains how the company helps healthcare providers leverage data to deliver better outcomes while optimizing reimbursement for all payment arrangements.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Ontario Systems: Optimizing Accounts Receivable in a Rapidly Changing Environment
Steve Scibetta, senior director of channel sales for Ontario Systems' healthcare product line, shares insights into effectively managing receivables.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Optum: Enabling Transformative Change
Elena White, vice president of risk, quality, and network solutions for Optum, discusses how healthcare providers can leverage data and technology as they enable risk in their organization.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
Somnia: Bending the Healthcare Cost Curve Toward Improved Anesthesia Value
Somnia President and CEO Marc Koch, MD, MBA, explains how hospitals can drive transformative change in the perioperative experience for outstanding clinical and financial outcomes.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
PMMC: Navigating Revenue Cycle Management Challenges as Value Based Purchasing Emerges
PMMC President Roger L. Shaul discusses the effects of healthcare reform on revenue cycle management and how PMMC's products help clients adapt to a changing financial environment.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Burgess: Simplify the Business of Healthcare
Greg Burgess, Founder and Chief Product Officer at Burgess Group shares insights and opportunities for payment integrity in the rapidly changing healthcare IT landscape.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.