Get the E-newsletter
Many healthcare organizations are transforming their traditional, insular operating structures to become more nimble and future-focused. What's more, their leadership and governance also are changing.
"The provider organizations experiencing the most substantial restructuring are those that are coming to market with some type of insurance product, because they are essentially creating a new, stand-alone business," says John Matthews, principal and U.S. healthcare and life sciences leader, KPMG Strategy, Chicago. Partially in response to the emphasis on accountable care and the shifting of financial risk to providers, several health systems have introduced health plans in recent years.
Even provider organizations without a health plan are restructuring in an effort to develop more regionally focused care teams or enhance their consumer engagement capabilities, Matthews says. "Many progressive healthcare organizations are starting to create nascent consumer insight capabilities, like what you might find in a consumer packaged goods company," he says. Unlike patient experience departments—which are also becoming more common in the industry—these functions are focused on understanding consumer behavior and motivation.
Changes in organizational structure are manifesting in various ways, including two of particular note.
Centralizing and professionalizing the board. Governance is evolving. "Today, boards in large health systems are starting to look more like corporate boards in other industries, comprised of senior business leaders who can help guide the organization on how to make investments and where to allocate capital," Matthews says.
Terri Welter, principal, ECG Management Consultants, Arlington, Va., agrees. "Increasingly, boards are looking at their composition and realizing they may need to add niche expertise," she says. "They know they need someone on the board who understands insurance and risk management. They also are looking for executives with IT and consumer engagement expertise."
At the same time, many community boards of smaller health systems are being subsumed into larger entities, which Matthews says is a consequence of transactions in which a larger health system acquires a hospital or smaller system. "Some organizations are developing transition plans in which community boards gradually cede their authority to a central board that is responsible for the overall enterprise," Matthews says. "This allows them to make decisions about where to shift capacity, which is difficult if you have many smaller boards. A centralized board also can determine whether to focus on developing certain service lines in particular areas, and whether to invest in physician practices and integrate."
Establishing physicians in leadership roles. The makeup of the C-suite also is evolving. "The most material leadership change I see is that more organizations are putting clinicians in senior executive positions," Welter says. "In particular, physicians are being asked to lead care model transformation, clinical informatics, and population health management initiatives."
The traditional CMO role is morphing into that of a chief transformation officer or chief clinical transformation officer, Welter says.
In contrast, Matthews believes the role of chief transformation officer could shift away from the clinical realm and into more of a human resources or change management function. "Eventually, the role could be more about how we drive the right incentives in the organization to create culture change," he says.
Philadelphia-based Jefferson, which includes Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Health, has restructured to support what its leaders call a more optimistic and entrepreneurial approach to academic medicine.
"The main reason why many in academic medicine are not as optimistic about the future is that they are relying on the old math—NIH [National Institutes of Health] funding, inpatient revenue, and tuition—for their success," says Stephen Klasko, MD, MBA, president and CEO, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Health. "We believe success in the future requires new math, which focuses on academics, clinical care, innovation, and philanthropy."
In fact, Jefferson has restructured its organization along those four pillars, each led by a COO who reports directly to Klasko. The COOs meet regularly and explore opportunities to work together. For example, they might discuss how a large philanthropic gift could be used to purchase new equipment for academic research and to enhance clinical care, while at the same time spurring an innovative partnership with a technology company. "That would have never happened in a traditional academic medical center," Klasko says. "If a gift went to one area, like research, the other areas—clinical and innovation—would have never known about it."
Only 50 to 60 percent of each COO's compensation is based directly on the performance of his or her pillar, with the remaining compensation based on the performance of the three other pillars.
Klasko believes such incentives are key to fostering teamwork across the enterprise. "If you want to predict a hospital's performance in the future, look at the C-suite's incentives," he says.
Jefferson's restructuring is seen in other areas as well.
Hiring leaders to support innovation and transformation. As part of its restructuring, Jefferson has hired a new chief innovation officer who is committed to commercializing products and services and to establishing joint ventures with other organizations. The chief innovation officer also works with leaders in the academic pillar to create an appointments, promotions, and tenure committee based on entrepreneurship, which will provide a new career track for entrepreneurial faculty. (In most academic medical entities, if a faculty member chooses to build his or her career around inventions and innovations, advancing up the professorial ranks is difficult because the promotions committee has traditionally looked only at NIH funding, education, and traditional scientific achievements. At Jefferson, leaders are creating a track where one can advance to "professor of entrepreneur and innovation" via a different promotions pathway.)
Leaders at Jefferson also have hired new vice presidents for decision analytics and for telehealth and urgent care, along with adding the role of chief patient experience officer.
Building and reassessing partnerships. In the past two years, Jefferson has grown from a $1.5 billion, three-hospital academic medical center to a $4 billion, eight-hospital system, largely due to a merger with Abington Jefferson Health, Abington, Pa. Jefferson also has signed definitive agreements to merge with Philadelphia-based Aria Health and with Kennedy Health, based in Cherry Hill, N.J. "We have abandoned the traditional hub-and-spoke model of care delivery because nobody really wants to be a spoke," Klasko says. "Instead, we have adopted a 'hub-and-hub' model, in which most care is delivered out in the communities."
In 2014, Jefferson financially decoupled from Main Line Health, a four-hospital system based in Bryn Mawr, Pa. "We were very different organizations, and we couldn't go on pretending we were merged," Klasko says. But all was not lost. Instead, Jefferson chose to focus on growing its accountable care organization (ACO) with Main Line Health. The Delaware Valley ACO, which manages nearly 100,000 Medicare lives, was one of the 10 most successful ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program in 2014, earning $6.57 million in shared savings.
In 2015, NewYork-Presbyterian, New York City, reorganized into four major divisions. These include the main academic medical center, with six campuses that operate under a single provider number and board; a regional hospital network including three community health systems under active management; a physician services group; and a division focused on community and population health, which includes the organization's new ACO.
Phyllis Lantos, executive vice president, CFO, and treasurer, NewYork-Presbyterian, New York City, says her organization’s new regional hospital network division will help its community hospitals becomes best-in-class in each geography.
Moving to an "active parent" model. Previously, NewYork-Presbyterian managed its relationships with community hospitals as a "passive parent." The community hospitals operated fairly independently, although the boards included staff from NewYork-Presbyterian, says Phyllis Lantos, executive vice president, CFO, and treasurer, NewYork-Presbyterian.
However, leaders at "the parent" hospital soon realized they were not getting the benefits of consolidation that would ensure the long-term viability and ability of these arrangements to continue to meet the needs of the community. "We felt as board members we had responsibility for financial performance, but lacked control to effect timely change in the passive parent model," Lantos says.
Recognizing that the passive parent model was not working, NewYork-Presbyterian has since moved to an "active parent" model in which the community hospitals operate under a consolidated financial statement, Lantos says. Lawrence Hospital, now NewYork-Presbyterian/Lawrence in Bronxville, N.Y., became the first hospital to enter the NewYork-Presbyterian Regional Hospital Network under the active parent model in 2014. The organization since has moved two other community hospitals to the active parent model.
Strengthening integration. Under the new active parent model, several executives from NewYork-Presbyterian have moved into president or COO roles at the community hospitals. "It's not that we want to impose everything that we do on the hospital—that's not how integration works," Lantos says. "But it is about creating complementary cultures and becoming best-in-class in each geography."
Still, Lantos recognizes that moving to an active parent role means walking a fine line. "You're stepping gingerly to keep people engaged and enthusiastic about their institution while asking them to change," Lantos says. "You don't want to disenfranchise your community, so you need to maintain the integrity of a community hospital while collaborating on best practices that can improve quality and reduce costs. Furthermore, through integration, we have the opportunity to spread best-practice learnings between the academic medical center and the regional hospital network, with each able to bring their unique ideas to the table."
Organizing physicians. NewYork-Presbyterian created its new physician services division as a way to provide centralized billing, credentialing, and other support to physician groups in Westchester, Queens, and Brooklyn. Other goals were to provide an umbrella organization for integrating full-time faculty with independent community physicians and to improve access to specialists in the community. A new chief integration and network development officer leads the division.
University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Medicine, Birmingham, Ala., restructured to emphasize a culture of safety and align goals and behaviors to enhance quality outcomes. Additionally, this approach supported enterprisewide initiatives focused on reducing costly practice variations and improving financial performance. A critical organizational care improvement initiative— "UAB Care"—engages clinical faculty in the redesign of care processes across the continuum and measures the subsequent impacts on clinical quality, patient satisfaction, and financial outcomes.
"In an environment predicated on transparency, quality outcomes are paramount," says Mary Beth Briscoe, CFO, UAB Hospital and UAB Medicine Clinical Operations.
Retooling infrastructure to focus on quality. UAB Medicine recently appointed its first chief medical officer, who leads the system's quality, patient safety, and clinical effectiveness activities. According to Loring Rue, MD, his role as CMO is "to better align our quality and patient safety efforts across the health system, and to promote value in our clinical practices." To this end, Rue seeks to establish synergies among existing resources, leverage technology to support clinical operations, and create joint accountability and buy-in among stakeholders. These activities are pursued through the UAB Medicine Program for Clinical and Operational Effectiveness, which was formed as part of the restructuring, and are supported by a newly established advanced enterprise analytics program.
"The demand for improved quality and enhanced operational efficiency was one of the key drivers for reorganizing our quality structure and approach at UAB Medicine," says Briscoe, who is also the former Chair of HFMA's Board of Directors. "As with most institutions, we had previously addressed traditional areas of organizational improvement. Effective organizational alignment coupled with our mandate for improved quality created a pathway for our clinical and administrative leadership to partner at a higher level. Collaboratively, key leadership actively pursued the reduction of practice variation and refinement of care processes, and facilitated organizational adoption."
For those care processes redesigned thus far, UAB Medicine experienced a reduction in length of stay, mortality, and variable cost per surgical case (see the exhibit below).
Impact of Care Process Redesign at UAB Medicine
Focusing on funds flow alignment. In 2014, UAB Medicine implemented a funds flow model that redefined the methodology by which dollars are invested in the departments of the School of Medicine to support the tripartite mission. To reinforce the advantages of physician and hospital alignment, UAB Medicine's funds flow model includes a value-based component. This component cascades from organizational pillar goals and emphasizes collaboration to attain quality, financial, and patient satisfaction goals. Additionally, the model is administered under a shared governance structure where revenue from the practice and the hospital are combined. An example of the shared governance structure is included in the exhibit below.
Funds Flow is Shared Governance
Creating alignment through organizational restructuring. To further organizational alignment, UAB Medicine also operationally restructured administrative responsibilities. Clinical operations were consolidated under the health system's COO, with senior vice presidents for inpatient care and ambulatory care responsible for day-to-day operations and coordination between the hospital and ambulatory clinics.
The objective was to create greater coordination of goals across the enterprise and to foster a culture focused on value-based medicine, Briscoe says. "It is evident in a reimbursement environment that rewards quality and efficiency that we are dependent on one another for success," she says.
What does it take for an organization focused on treating acute, episodic illnesses to transform into a true healthcare delivery company? Leaders at SSM Health, St. Louis, believe such a transformation starts with properly aligning the health system's resources, including in two key ways.
Building a cohesive physician and ambulatory services unit. As part of a 2013 restructuring, SSM Health created a physician and ambulatory services business unit that includes the health system's six employed medical groups in four states.
"What we have lacked is a way to see our assets, including our ambulatory assets, as part of a coordinated, reliable system of care," says Shane Peng, MD, president of physician and ambulatory services. Peng's role involves building the health system's capabilities to manage population health in the ambulatory setting and to reduce preventable healthcare costs, typically in the inpatient environment.
Creating a value-based care and payment task force. SSM Health has approximately 500,000 lives under some form of value-based contract, from fully capitated to shared savings to pay for performance. Peng leads a new task force focused on driving performance in the organization's shared savings and risk-based contracts. "The new task force allows us to reverse-engineer what we need to do to improve performance and realize opportunities from our existing contracts," Peng says. The task force includes senior executives such as the CFO, CIO, president of hospital operations, and senior regional leaders, who work together to assess opportunities in each contract.
"This initiative has already quantified existing value- based contracts to be worth millions of dollars, if SSM can achieve the optimal performance in these contracts," Peng says. "If achieved, the amount will flow into the bottom line of the organization.
"Once we understand the infrastructure necessary to perform well in these contracts, we will transition this task force into a more permanent infrastructure that will support value-based contracts moving forward," Peng adds.
Hospitals and health systems likely will add new talent and test new organizational structures as trends such as consumerism and risk sharing gain more momentum. Healthcare leaders who are restructuring proactively suggest the following strategies.
Stop making incremental changes. Jefferson's Klasko believes healthcare organizations need to quit focusing on the past and start asking, "What if?" At his organization, leaders model out various scenarios, such as what could happen if joint replacements become an outpatient procedure. "We need to be ready for a world that will need less inpatient beds," Klasko says. "In other words, we need to stop acting like Blockbuster did when the world was moving to Netflix."
Tread lightly. When restructuring involves changing the parent model of regional hospitals, Lantos, of NewYork-Presbyterian, stresses the importance of emotional intelligence. "You want to be sensitive and deliberate so you don't damage the relationship," Lantos says. "You also want to be humble and recognize that as the parent, you do not have all of the answers."
Reach across the aisle. UAB Medicine's Briscoe urges finance leaders to proactively approach collaboration with clinical leaders, particularly efforts focused on patient outcomes and clinical quality. "Our current and future roles in finance depend on strategic partnerships and teamwork with our clinical partners," Briscoe says. "Quality can be a strategic advantage for our organizations and is critical to our future financial and reputational success. Most importantly, quality care is what we owe the patients and communities we serve."
Use a dyad model to elevate physician leaders. In each of SSM Health's regions, the president of the hospital division is matched with the president of the physician division. SSM Health also uses a dyad model at the national health system level. "We operate as a singular unit to make sure what we do is balanced and puts the needs of patients at the forefront," says Peng, whose dyad partner is the health system's president of hospital operations.
As the healthcare industry becomes more consumer- focused, KPMG's Matthews believes many provider organizations will need to recruit talent from outside of health care.
"When life science companies were interested in becoming more retail-oriented in the 1990s, they imported talent from consumer goods companies," Matthews says. "I believe this will also happen in health care, with organizations hiring from consumer goods, retail, or even technology if they want innovation to occur," Matthews says.
In the future, providers could even test whether new leaders and structures can support a sales function. Such sales teams could be used to persuade payers to enter risk-sharing arrangements, sell health plans to the market, or directly contract with employers. As Matthews says, "For the first time, providers will need to know how to construct and communicate a value proposition for what they have to offer."
Laura Ramos Hegwer is a freelance writer and editor based in Lake Bluff, Ill.
Interviewed for this article: John Matthews, principal and U.S. healthcare and life sciences leader, KPMG Strategy, Chicago.
Terri Welter, principal, ECG Management Consultants, Arlington, Va.
Stephen Klasko, MD, MBA, president and CEO, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Health, Philadelphia.
Phyllis Lantos, executive vice president, CFO, and treasurer, NewYork-Presbyterian, New York City.
Mary Beth Briscoe, CFO, UAB Hospital and UAB Medicine Clinical Operations, Birmingham, Ala.
Loring Rue, MD, chief medical officer, UAB Medicine.
Shane Peng, MD, president of physician and ambulatory services, SSM Health, St. Louis.
Grant Thornton: Facilitating EAM
Priority Advantage: Helping Organizations Optimize Their Medicare Advantage Plans
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Building a Clinically-Integrated Network
As value-based payment models evolve, providers are challenged to maintain superior clinical outcomes while controlling costs.
Winning in the Post-Acute Marketplace
Read more about factors contributing to the changes in the post-acute marketplace and what it means for manufacturers, physicians, clinicians, patients, and post-acute facilities as they anticipate the transition to the second curve.
Building A Common Vision with Employed Physicians
HSG helped the physicians and executives of St. Claire Regional in Morehead, Kentucky, define their shared vision for how the group would evolve over the next decade. As well as, develop the strategic and operational priorities which refocused and accelerated the group’s evolution.
Practice Performance Improvement
The client was a nine-hospital health system with 14 clinics serving communities in a multi-state market with very limited access to care, poor economic conditions, high unemployment, and a heavy Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured payer mix. In most of these communities, the system was the sole source of care.
Though the clinics were of substantial size (they employed 98 physicians) and comprised of multiple specialists, the physicians functioned as individuals and the practices lacked any real group culture.
Clinical Integration Without Spending a Fortune
Clinical integration can be expensive, but it doesn’t have to be, as this four-step road map for developing a CIN proves. Does it have to cost millions to initiate a clinical integration strategy?
Contrary to popular belief, we have clients who have generated substantial shared savings and a significant ROI over time, without massive investments. Yes, some financial capital is required for resources the CIN providers can’t bring to the table themselves. But the size of that investment can be miniscule relative to the value it produces: improved outcomes and documentation for payers.
Adding Value to Physician Compensation
Today’s concerns about physician compensation are the result of the changing healthcare environment. The transition to value is slow, but finally becoming a reality. Proactive hospitals want to ensure that provider incentives are properly aligned with ever-increasing value-based demands.
This report focuses on the three big questions HSG receives about adding value to physician compensation; Why are organizations redesigning their provider compensation plans? What elements and parameters must be part of successful compensation plans? How are organizations implementing compensation changes?
Effective Revenue Cycle Management in Your Network
Revenue Cycle Management has become an even more complex issue with declining reimbursements, implementation of Electronic Health Records, evolving local carrier determinations (LCD), and payer credentialing [The emphasis on healthcare fraud, abuse and compliance has increased the importance of accuracy of data reporting and claims filing).
The efficiency of a medical practice’s billing operations has critical impact on the financial performance. In many cases, patient billings are the primary revenue source that pays staff salaries, provider compensation and overhead operating cost. Inefficiencies or inaccurate billing will contribute to operating losses.
Succeeding in Value-Based Care
This publication identifies and outlines the necessary characteristics of a fully-functioning clinically integrated network (CIN). What it doesn’t do is detail how hospitals and providers can participate in the value-based care environment during the development process.
One common misconception is that the CIN can’t do anything significant until it has obtained the FTC’s “clinically integrated” stamp of approval. While the network must satisfy the FTC’s definition of clinical integration before single signature contracting for FFS rates and contracts can legally start, hospitals and providers can enjoy three key benefits during the development process.
Therapy: Benefits at All Levels of Care
Nearly half of all Medicare beneficiaries treated in the hospital will need post-acute care services after discharge. For these patients, a stay in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility or other post-acute care setting comes between hospital and home.
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
With the proper process, tools, and feedback mechanisms in place, budgeting can be a valuable exercise for organizations while helping hold organizational leaders accountable. Having a proper monthly variance review process is one of the most critical factors in creating a more efficient and accurate budget. Monthly variance reporting puts parameters around what is to be expected during the upcoming budget entry process.
Cost Accounting: the Key to Cost Management and Profitability
Managing the cost of patient care is the top strategic priority of most hospital CFOs today. As healthcare shifts to more data-driven decision making, having clear visibility into key volume, cost and profitability measures across clinical service lines is becoming increasingly important for both long-range and tactical planning activities. In turn, the cost accounting function in healthcare provider organizations is becoming an increasingly important and strategic function. This whitepaper includes five strategies for efficient and accurate cost accounting and service line analytics and keys to overcoming the associated challenges.