On Demand Webinar | Basic | Coronavirus
<div>As COVID-19 pandemic materialized and spread, it has changed so much about healthcare delivery, how we prepare, and how we go about our daily lives.&nbsp; We are reminded how fragile our health and the healthcare system can be. As an i...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Intermediate | Coronavirus
The COVID-19 pandemic is ravaging healthcare facilities, which is partly due to a lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and other critical supplies.&nbsp; Vulnerabilities in the supply chain have been exposed. As such, hospitals shoul...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Basic | Coronavirus
In the wake of COVID-19, many healthcare providers that traditionally relied on physical office space had to quickly adapt their operations to meet regulatory guidelines and ensure the safety of their employees by shifting to remote work. O...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Basic | Coronavirus
Relying on aggressive financial policies and collection tactics won't help your organization adapt to the "patient as payer" model, especially after the pandemic.&nbsp; Instead, you need a strategy that helps patients easily navigate the fi...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Basic | Coronavirus
<div>The COVID-19 pandemic is causing major economic disruptions and has left many health systems struggling to find ways to drive cash supply and forecast budgets. The ability to pivot and prepare a financial operating plan that provides a...
Save
Blog | Coronavirus

A murky step in the right direction: HHS releases updated CARES Act Provider Relief Fund guidance

Blog | Coronavirus

A murky step in the right direction: HHS releases updated CARES Act Provider Relief Fund guidance

  • The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)  released updated CARES Act PRF guidance Oct. 22.
  • In that guidance, it appears HHS partially reverts back to the June 19 FAQs, which based the amount of PRF a provider is entitled to on lost revenue as opposed to its switch to lost margin in the Sept. 19 guidance.
  • The revisions also provide clarity about criteria that reporting entities must meet, and the accounting method providers must use.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)  released updated CARES Act PRF guidance. While additional clarity is warranted, it appears HHS partially reverts back to the June 19 FAQs, which based the amount of PRF a provider is entitled to on lost revenue as opposed to its switch to lost margin in the Sept. 19 guidance.

Specifically, the revised guidance states:

“PRF payment amounts not fully expended on healthcare related expenses attributable to coronavirus are then applied to patient care lost revenues, net of the healthcare related expenses attributable to coronavirus calculated under step 1. Recipients may apply PRF payments toward lost revenue, up to the amount of the difference between their 2019 and 2020 actual patient care revenue.”

Despite the clarification and related edits, the revised guidance still contains lists of G&A and healthcare related expenses in the section on lost revenue (section 3/step 2). The list differs slightly from the list of G&A and healthcare expenses included in the calculation of expenses related to COVID-19 (section 2/step 3). If the “lost revenue calculation” is no longer a margin calculation, then it’s unclear why these sections weren’t deleted in the revisions.

Additional clarifications

The revisions also provide clarity in two other areas which are highlighted below:

Reporting entity: In addition to defining a reporting entity (RE) as a TIN that received at least one PRF payment, the revised instructions clarify that the RE could also be, “an entity that meets the following three criteria:

1. Is the parent of one or more subsidiary billing TINs that received General Distribution payments.

2. Has providers associated with it that were providing diagnoses, testing, or care for individuals with possible or actual cases of COVID-19 on or after January 31, 2020, and 3 Is an entity that can otherwise attest to the Terms and Conditions.”

Accounting method: For both step one (COVID-19 related expenses) and step two (lost revenue related to COVID), the updated guidance clarifies that providers will, “report their use of PRF funds using their normal method of accounting (cash or accrual basis).”

Links to updated guidance

Here are links to the updated HHS guidance and release memo.

About the Author

Chad Mulvany, FHFMA,

is director, healthcare finance policy, strategy and development, HFMA’s Washington, D.C., office.

Advertisements

Related Articles | Coronavirus

Column | Coronavirus

Spillover effects of COVID-19 portend growing challenge for hospitals

Far more attention has been paid to the direct effects of COVID-19 on the healthcare system, including on hospitals, than to its indirect effects on hospitals, which include the impact on care other than COVID-19-related care.

Blog | Physician Relationships

COVID-19-induced revenue issues and staffing challenges causing some PCP practices to close their doors

HFMA's Chad Mulvany says if Congress passes another COVID-19 relief bill, which includes an additional PRF appropriation, it will address the PCP’s short-term financial issues, but will not solve staffing issues.

Blog | Coronavirus

HHS Provider Relief Fund clarifications provide much-needed information

Several clarifications related to the treatment of depreciation, expenses for stockpiling PPE and revenue to the HHS Provider Relief Fund (PRF) FAQs were released Nov. 18 by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.

Trend | Financial Sustainability

COVID-19's impact on healthcare drives the need for a consumer focus

Healthcare providers require a consumer focus to be able to address the many profound and ongoing impacts of COVID-19, including patient anxiety, reduced patient volumes, unfavorable changes in payer mix and poor financial performance.