Course | Overview | Transparency
This course addresses the HFMA Healthcare Dollars and Sense initiative and its impact on revenue cycle operations.<div><br></div><div>Estimated course completion time: 1 hour</div>
Save
Course | Overview | Transparency
This course addresses the principles of price transparency, the role of price estimates in patient financial care and how pricing information is used to prepare and present price estimates.<div><br></div><div>Estimated course completion tim...
Save
News | Transparency

Hospital executives urge colleagues to comment on upcoming transparency rules

News | Transparency

Hospital executives urge colleagues to comment on upcoming transparency rules

  • Providers and health plans need to watch for and comment on HHS transparency rules coming by the end of August.
  • The rules will clarify what information — charges or negotiated prices — hospitals will have to release publicly.
  • Many providers have launched tools to provide specific advanced estimates to their patients — with varying levels of success.

Hospital and health plan executives were urged by finance leaders to plan to comment on coming federal department rules implementing this week’s White House executive order on healthcare transparency.

On Monday, President Donald Trump issued an executive order requiring several federal departments to issue rules on transparency, including requiring hospitals to publicly disclose “charges and information based on negotiated rates” in an easy-to-read format. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was given two months to issue a proposed rule implementing the hospital-charge and rate-disclosure requirements.

On Tuesday, revenue cycle leaders urged provider and health plan leaders to provide their insights through the formal public comment process — when the proposed rules are issued.

“It’s incumbent, upon us as leaders, especially during the comment period that’s going to come out, that we’re engaged so we can ensure that we make this meaningful,” said Margaret Schuler, system vice president of revenue cycle for OhioHeath.

Schuler cited requirements that hospitals begin posting their chargemasters online in January 2019 as an example of a federal transparency policy “that was not meaningful.”

“We really need to lean in to helping the government understand the complexities of price transparency and then how we can really make it meaningful for our consumers,” Schuler said.

Terrie Handy, vice president of revenue cycle for Legacy Health System, urged both provider and payer organizations to comment on the proposed rules on charges or rates when they are released.

Barbara Tapscott, vice president of revenue management for Geisinger Health, raised concerns that providers may not be the best source for the transparency data sought by consumers.

“Insurance companies are better positioned in my opinion to provide additional information to their members,” Tapscott said. “One would expect that this can be a good change if everyone is at the table.”

Earlier transparency efforts

Joe Fifer, president and CEO of HFMA, noted that the association has long advocated for informing patients upfront about their out-of-pocket costs for care, including leading a 2014 industry consensus on price transparency guidelines.

“Frankly, we’ve been leading in this area for more than 10 years,” Fifer said.

Fifer urged healthcare finance leaders to personally walk through their organization’s revenue cycle processes. “It sometimes points to those things we wouldn’t like if we were a patient,” Fifer said.

Health system’s efforts on transparency in recent years included Geisinger’s offer of pre-service estimates through its patient web portal. Since launching it, Geisinger has learned that patients want more specific estimates than the provided generic estimates, which did not consider care variations. However, the system is examining ways to adjust its estimates for patients whose care was changed from what was initially estimated.

After acquiring facilities with grandfathered health plan contracts, with which the health system was not experienced, Geisinger has found its estimates for some of those patients were highly inaccurate.

“On a case-by-case basis, we are honoring and putting our word and our mission in front of that patient and honoring our estimate,” Tapscott said.

One challenge Geisinger has had with its transparency tool is low-use rates by its patients, which may stem in part from more people using health-plan-shopping websites. In contrast, on the Geisinger portal, like many provider portals, patients also would have access to quality data on providers they are comparing.

About the Author

Rich Daly, HFMA senior writer/editor,

is a senior writer/editor in HFMA’s Washington, D.C., office. Follow Rich on Twitter: @rdalyhealthcare

Advertisements

Related Articles | Transparency

Blog | Consumerism

Not like the others: House Ways and Means surprise bill legislation

Provider friendly House Ways and Means surprise bill draft legislation doesn't rely on a benchmark payment rate like competing versions.

News | Transparency

Jan. 27-31: Deadline to comment on health plan price transparency rule is among upcoming healthcare finance events

A complete listing of healthcare finance-related hearings, conferences, webinars, public forums and deadlines for the week of Jan. 27.

News | Revenue Cycle

Big divergence nationally found among hospitals both in billed charges and amounts paid

A national consultancy found large disparities in what hospitals charge and in the revenue they garner for most common services.

News | Transparency

CMS extends comment period for health plan price transparency rule

CMS will accept feedback for an additional two weeks on a proposed rule requiring health plan price transparency.