Live Webinar | Operations and Other Technology
Save
Live Webinar | Patient Financial Communications
Save
Live Webinar | Costing and Managerial Accounting
Save
Column | Cost Effectiveness of Health

Operationalizing value-based primary care: lessons from the field

Sponsored by Kaufman Hall
Column | Cost Effectiveness of Health

Operationalizing value-based primary care: lessons from the field


For more than a decade, hospitals, payers and other healthcare stakeholders have experimented with moving healthcare payment from fee-for-service, volume-based contracts to arrangements that reward providers for the value of the care they provide. This approach — known as value-based care — is intended to spur high-quality patient care while controlling overall costs. And the primary care physician’s office — an increasingly central front door of the healthcare system—plays a pivotal role.

However, to successfully execute a value-based primary care model, organizations should be mindful of the all-too-common pitfalls that they may encounter along the way. For example:

  • Incentives needed to gain meaningful buy-in from front-line staff — and drive the operational changes needed to implement and document new protocols — may not be adequately aligned.
  • The transition to value-based care may be executed too quickly or too broadly, leading to uneven results across large populations of covered patients.
  • The focus may be too specifically on leveraging revenue cycle changes to drive value-based care, leading the organization to run out of steam in the implementation process.

Industry leaders focused on primary care: recent successes

Several emerging companies focused primarily or exclusively on primary care have pursued significant growth and touted promising, if early, performance results in recent years:

  • ChenMed operates about 100 primary care practices in 12 states, with a focus on serving vulnerable seniors on Medicare. ChenMed’s physicians provide more than 10 times the amount of face time than the national average. The company recently reported a 22% lower incidence of stroke in patients who had been enrolled for more than a year. ChenMed also recently reported providing more preventive care during the early days of the pandemic in 2020 than the national average.
  • Oak Street Health, which provides primary care for Medicare beneficiaries with a focus on preventive health, operates 125 centers in 20 states. The company, which recently entered into a partnership with AARP,  cites a 51% reduction in hospital admissions, a 42% reduction in readmission rates and a 51% reduction in emergency department visits compared with Medicare benchmarks since its founding in 2012.
  • One Medical offers in-network primary care at more than 100 offices nationwide and round-the-clock virtual care. In 2021, One Medical acquired Iora Health, which provides team-based care for Medicare beneficiaries.
  • UnitedHealth Group’s Optum arm, which has more than 60,000 physicians and 1,500 clinics, recently announced plans to cover 500,000 new patients in value-based arrangements by the end of 2022. Optum, whose physicians and providers work with more than 100 payers, reported $155.6 billion in revenue in 2021, a 14% increase from 2020.

However, these companies have the advantage of serving populations exclusively enrolled in value-based care models, unlike most hospitals, health systems and physician practices. Fortunately, these latter organizations can take a few lessons from the field that can help them experiment with value-based care and achieve success and scale on the fly while avoiding the pitfalls of their predecessors.

Lesson 1: Operationalize value-based care at the point of care

While value-based care strategies may be designed in the boardroom, their success or failure hinges on what transpires at the point of care — often in a primary care practice.

Michael Supino, CEO of Midland Medical, a primary care provider in Oakland Park, Florida, notes that gaining meaningful buy-in from physicians, clinicians and other staff is essential to a successful value-based care initiative, and achieving that buy-in requires appropriately aligning incentives to their day-to-day responsibilities.

Midland Medical worked with Stellar Health, a healthcare technology company focused on helping providers improve quality and healthcare outcomes, to develop an incentive program for a value-based care workflow that also supports financial performance. Physicians and other team members were reimbursed for specific actions — for instance, following up on referrals or checking with patients on specific tests — as soon as claims were validated, instead of waiting months or even a full year for a value-based care related bonus.

“The first reaction is pushback,” Supino said. “But once our team got a good understanding [of the incentives] being aligned with delivering higher quality care to patients, everyone perked up. We gave our team a real-time incentive to do what they were already doing, and then gave them a tool to supercharge it by identifying the most impactful actions of a patient visit. The goal of our providers is better patient care, and this approach allows that to occur at scale by keeping incentives and healthcare outcomes aligned.”

Through the initiative, Midland was able to increase its adoption of wellness visits and best practices for diagnoses and transitions of care.

Lesson 2: Pilot value-based care first before going systemwide

Instead of trying to implement value-based care across an entire system, focus on a few locations at first. For instance, instead of aiming for covering, say, 5% of patients in value-based care contracts across your system, aim for 50% plus value-based care patients at a few locations. At that level, organizations and their physicians will be able to test and scale changes to make meaningful value-based care improvements.

Lesson 3: Give your team space (and cover) to take chances

Organizations with a track record of success in value-based care have all taken different paths to reach their goals. For example, physicians involved in value-based care often need air cover to send  patients outside of the health system — if they believe it will provide a higher-quality and/or lower-cost outcome for their patients under value-based care. For example, rather than penalizing physicians for sending labs to a cheaper vendor, the health system should see these out-of-network decisions as a learning opportunity to challenge its legacy fee-for-service bias. The leaders of value-based care programs need the freedom and “air cover” to experiment, learn and actively respond to challenges and opportunities.

 

About the Author

Matthew Bates

is managing director and physician enterprise service line lead, Kaufman, Hall & Associates, LLC, Chicago, Ill. (mbates@kaufmanhall.com). 

Sign up for a free guest account and get access to five free articles every month.

Advertisements

Related Articles | Cost Effectiveness of Health

Column | Value-Based Payment

Paul Keckley: 2 major changes in the value agenda require finance leaders’ attention

The value agenda in U.S. healthcare is critical to its future, but there are two key areas in which it is likely to be redirected in years to come.

News | Strategic Partnerships Mergers and Acquisitions

CVS Health gains capabilities in home healthcare, value-based care with massive deal to buy Signify Health

CVS Health’s announced acquisition of Signify Health is a key step in the company’s efforts to establish a comprehensive healthcare network.

Case Study | Cost Effectiveness of Health

New IDS merger aims to improve value and access for its communities

A case study of a merger of two health systems in the Pacific Northwest exemplifies a recent shift in focus among health system mergers, toward creating transformative partnerships aimed at improving value and overall cost effectiveness.

Column | Cost Effectiveness of Health

Healthcare organizations need a better way to measure ROI of health equity investments

Healthcare organizations’ investments in health equity can deliver a meaningful ROI, but identifying the financial benefits of such investments requires an expanded framework for analysis beyond criteria used in a standard ROI analysis.