Course | Basic | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement
In this course we will address scheduling processes, including<div><ul><li>Patient identification</li><li>Requested service</li><li>Medical necessity screening</li><li>Medicare Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage processing</li><li>Pa...
Save
Course | Overview | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement
This course provides a brief history and overview of Medicare and Medicaid. It describes government organizations that regulate and administer this program. This course also discusses Medicare reimbursement. In addition, it highlights recen...
Save
Course | Intermediate | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement
This course provides a general discussion and overview of reimbursement provided by Medicare under the outpatient prospective payment system. It also discusses the use of ambulatory payment classifications in the outpatient prospective paym...
Save
Course | Intermediate | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement
This course provides an overview of the prospective payment systems used in the Medicare program and as well as Medicare fee schedules. This course provides a general discussion and overview of Medicare reimbursement under the Inpatient Pro...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Intermediate | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement
As the senior population continues to outpace the relative growth of the general population, and Medicare Advantage is accounting for about one-third (and growing every year) of all new Medicare eligible enrollees, providers are increasingl...
Save
News | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement

Public option could endanger 1,000 rural hospitals: analysis

News | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement

Public option could endanger 1,000 rural hospitals: analysis

  • As many as 55% of rural hospitals, or 1,037 hospitals across 46 states, would be at high risk of closure if a public option were implemented.
  • The closures could cost 420,000 jobs.
  • Rural hospitals not placed at high risk of closure may have to eliminate services and reduce clinical and administrative staff.

Creation of a public-option government insurance plan could endanger the solvency of more than 1,000 rural hospitals, according to a Navigant analysis.

The consultancy analyzed the financial impact of incorporating a government insurance program in the individual-insurance market, with providers paid at Medicare rates as is the case in the four leading legislative proposals. Some of the proposals offer the possibility that rates would increase under various scenarios.

The impact, according to the analysis, would place as many as 55% of rural hospitals, or 1,037 hospitals across 46 states, at high risk of closure. The rural hospitals at high risk represent more than 63,000 staffed beds and 420,000 employees, according to Navigant.

Additionally, rural hospitals not placed at high risk of closure could have to eliminate services and reduce clinical and administrative staff.

The negative outcomes were based on Navigant’s analysis of three possible scenarios under which the availability of a public insurance option would lead many to leave higher-paying commercial plans.

The range of outcomes included:

  • A 2.3% revenue loss to rural hospitals if only the uninsured and current individual-market participants shift to the public option, with 28% of rural hospitals then at high risk of closure
  • An 8% revenue decrease if employers shift 25% of covered workers from commercial coverage to a public option, placing 51% of rural hospitals at high risk of closure
  • A 13.9% revenue decrease if employers shift 50% of covered employees to a public option, placing 55% of rural hospitals at high risk of closure

To prevent such financial consequences, the consultancy projected, Medicare would have to increase hospital payment rates under a public option by 40%-60%. That would cost between $4 billion and $25 billion annually, depending on the extent of the employer coverage shift.

The challenge facing hospital opposition to such plans was illustrated by a July Kaiser Family Foundation tracking poll, which found nearly two-thirds of the public (65%) favors a public option that “would compete with private health insurance plans and be available to all Americans.”

Just one more threat facing rural hospitals

A public option would significantly add to the financial challenges rural hospital have faced in recent years. Specifically, 108 rural hospitals have closed across 29 states since 2010, and Navigant found 21% of rural hospitals remain at high risk of closing unless their financial situations improve.

The negative financial performance of rural hospitals is partly driven by losses they incur on government-covered business. Excluding critical access hospitals, rural hospitals have an operating margin on Medicare patients of approximately negative 8.2%, which creates a dependence on commercial health plan patients and those with employer-sponsored insurance to make up the difference. 

The states where rural hospitals would face the biggest rates of revenue loss under all three scenarios are California and Pennsylvania, according to the analysis. Under the most adverse scenario analyzed, rural hospitals would lose nearly 20% of their revenue in California and 19.1% in Pennsylvania. 

Building on a previous analysis

The analysis followed a March report by Navigant on the financial impact of “Medicare for All” (single payer), a Medicare buy-in for those at least 55 years old and a public option that uses Medicare rates, using a hypothetical, $1.2 billion regional multihospital system as an example.

That study found significant financial harm to the hypothetical system from the Medicare public option, moving the system from a 2.3% operating margin to operating losses ranging from 3.9% to 8.4% of revenues.

Navigant noted that rural hospitals are much smaller than that hypothetical system and significantly more vulnerable from any reduction in revenues since they already have low volumes, little or no financial reserves and negligible shares of commercially insured patients.

The new report was funded by the Partnership for America’s Health Care Future, an alliance of health plans, providers and drugmakers.

About the Author

Richard Daly

is based in the Washington, D.C., office. Follow Rich on Twitter: @rdalyhealthcare

Advertisements

Related Articles | Medicare Payment and Reimbursement

Blog | Coronavirus

Delayed care will have a butterfly effect on the Medicare Advantage rate setting

HFMA’s Chad Mulvany says healthcare providers can take specific actions to reengage with patients who are postponing and/or avoiding healthcare for fear of being exposed to COVID-19.

News | Coronavirus

Medicare considering making telehealth expansion permanent, Verma says

Medicare is considering making permanent some of the temporary telehealth waivers it has issued during the pandemic.

News | Coronavirus

May 25-29: COVID-19 congressional hearings and various online-only events are among the key happenings in healthcare finance

A complete listing of healthcare finance-related hearings, conferences, webinars, public forums and deadlines for the week of May 25.

Blog | Coronavirus

The increased uninsured population and changes in coverage for others requires healthcare finance departments to revise their practices

As a result of unemployment, insurance coverage has changed for millions of Americans, making it more important than ever for healthcare providers to offer financial counseling, community outreach and patient education.