On Demand Webinar | Basic | Coronavirus
<div>As COVID-19 pandemic materialized and spread, it has changed so much about healthcare delivery, how we prepare, and how we go about our daily lives.&nbsp; We are reminded how fragile our health and the healthcare system can be. As an i...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Intermediate | Coronavirus
The COVID-19 pandemic is ravaging healthcare facilities, which is partly due to a lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and other critical supplies.&nbsp; Vulnerabilities in the supply chain have been exposed. As such, hospitals shoul...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Basic | Coronavirus
In the wake of COVID-19, many healthcare providers that traditionally relied on physical office space had to quickly adapt their operations to meet regulatory guidelines and ensure the safety of their employees by shifting to remote work. O...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Basic | Coronavirus
Relying on aggressive financial policies and collection tactics won't help your organization adapt to the "patient as payer" model, especially after the pandemic.&nbsp; Instead, you need a strategy that helps patients easily navigate the fi...
Save
On Demand Webinar | Basic | Coronavirus
<div>The COVID-19 pandemic is causing major economic disruptions and has left many health systems struggling to find ways to drive cash supply and forecast budgets. The ability to pivot and prepare a financial operating plan that provides a...
Save
News | Coronavirus

Bundled payment participants face choices on 2020 performance measurement, continued participation

News | Coronavirus

Bundled payment participants face choices on 2020 performance measurement, continued participation

  • Current BPCI-A participants will need to decide this fall whether to stay in the program for 2021.
  • Some participants' results worsened in the second year, according to newly released data.
  • Decisions on remaining in the program should take into account new options from CMS. 

Provider participants in Medicare’s largest bundled payment program must decide not only whether to remain in the program but also whether to use new COVID-19-related flexibilities in performance measurement.

The more than 1,000 hospitals and physician group practices that remain in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A) voluntary model face some tough decisions this year, with Medicare offering new options in response to the pandemic. Those options came amid massive disruptions in elective episodes and procedures after many hospitals ceased to offer them during much of the pandemic either voluntarily or in response to government mandates.

“For institutions, they’re evaluating whether or not to even stay in the program for [2021] because of the uncertainty and the financial risk,” said John Kalamaras, business intelligence analytics manager at DataGen. “So, they have to judge how they are doing now and if they are going to continue on in the program.”

That decision-making process will occur amid CMS’s recent release of 2019 performance data, which showed worsening performance among DataGen clients.

Unlike during the first year of the program, which began in 2018, not all of DataGen’s participating clients obtained performance bonuses in 2019, and the payouts were smaller for those that received them, Kalamaras said.

Providers must evaluate their options

A provider’s decision on proceeding in the program should be informed by its updated target prices from CMS and its updated case mix. Both factors likely were affected by the pandemic, when only much more acute cases were treated due to hospital restrictions. CMS changes the target as a provider’s case mix changes.

“If their case mix was more acute [in 2020], then their target might be higher than it would be on a preliminary target,” Kalamaras said.

Provider organizations also have some control over their performance outcomes in 2020 by selecting one of three new options from CMS. Those options are:

  1. Removing all upside and downside risk
  2. Removing just COVID-19 patients from calculations
  3. Continuing to participate as usual

CMS recently said it will identify in the data it sends to providers which patients were COVID-19 patients.

That “is very helpful so that participants can do a full evaluation of all three options,” Kalamaras said.

The choice should be driven by separate analyses of providers’ overall patient population in BPCI-A and of their COVID patients in the model.

A basic guide to choosing among the options, Kalamaras said, includes:

  • Choosing the third option if the best financial results are seen when evaluating all model participants
  • Choosing the second option if the best financial results are seen when removing COVID-19 patients
  • Choosing the first option if no positive financial results are seen in either of those analyses

CMS has not specified a deadline for provider decisions on how they want to be evaluated this year. The agency is expected to send out 2021 agreements within the next two months, with responses due in the fall.

Data released on first-year BPCI-A participation

On June 19, CMS released a third-party analysis of the first-year of BPCI-A. Among the details, which did not include performance data:

  • Initial enrollment consisted of 715 hospital and 580 physician group practices.
  • About 22% of eligible hospitals participated, compared with 13% in the predecessor BPCI model.
  • More than half of hospital participants took part in the “congestive heart failure” clinical episode.
  • More than two-thirds of practices took part in the “major joint replacement of the lower extremity” episode.
  • About 9% of eligible Medicare fee-for-service discharges and outpatient procedures were at a BPCI-A hospital.
 

About the Author

Rich Daly, HFMA senior writer and editor,

is based in the Washington, D.C., office. Follow Rich on Twitter: @rdalyhealthcare

Advertisements

Related Articles | Coronavirus

News | Coronavirus

Amid the pandemic, cost control becomes hospitals' top benefits-related focus, survey finds

Health systems have prioritized cost control in their personnel offices in response to the pandemic’s revenue impacts, a new survey found.

Blog | Coronavirus

What can healthcare providers expect now that a COVID-19 relief package failed a procedural vote in the Senate

HFMA's Chad Mulvany says it’s not surprising the GOP's COVID-19 relief measure failed, given the package was negotiated without input from Democrats.

News | Coronavirus

ED, inpatient volumes have stagnated since June, analysis finds

Hospitals’ ED and inpatient volumes have not improved since the June surge in patients following the resumption of most hospital services after COVID-19 service suspensions were lifted.

News | Coronavirus

As states tweak Medicaid programs, enrollment increases fall far short of job losses

Medicaid enrollment increases have lagged far behind unemployment increases but are still pressuring states facing a budget squeeze during the recession.