Blog | Medicaid Compliance

Analysis: What factors will come into play as stakeholders respond to a recent decision on Medicaid work rules

Blog | Medicaid Compliance

Analysis: What factors will come into play as stakeholders respond to a recent decision on Medicaid work rules

  • Even though the court ruling applies only to the Kentucky and Arkansas cases, it’s worth watching to see how the various stakeholders respond.
  • How will states like Georgia that are considering Medicaid coverage expansion respond?
  • How will the ruling impact HHS decisions on future waivers that include work requirements
  • Politico reported on March 27 that “a federal judge today blocked new work requirements on Medicaid recipients for a second time, dealing another blow to the Trump administration's efforts to reshape the safety net healthcare program.” 

    The ruling found the government failed to identify how adding employment requirements to the program furthered Medicaid’s purpose of providing insurance coverage to low-income individuals. The article states: “Both of the court decisions issued Wednesday remand the Arkansas and Kentucky projects back to HHS. But the ramifications of [U.S. District Judge James} Boasberg’s ruling, issued nine months after he first blocked work requirements in Kentucky last summer, extend beyond those two states.”

    For more information, see the HFMA article “Medicaid Work Requirements Impact Hospital Finances: Report.

    Takeaway

    Even though the ruling only applies to the Kentucky and Arkansas cases, it’s worth watching to see how the various stakeholders respond. Key things to look for include:

    1. How will this impact U.S. Department of Health and Human Services decisions on future waivers that include work requirements? Given that Utah’s partial expansion waiver, which included a work requirement, was approved shortly after the ruling, it looks like the administration is determined to press forward despite setbacks in court.
    2. How will Kentucky and Arkansas respond? Gov. Matt Blevin has threatened to overturn coverage expansion. It’s one thing to threaten it, it’s another thing to run the political risk of taking coverage away from 400,000 individuals. On April 2, the Arkansas House of Representatives passed a Senate-approved bill that continued its Medicaid expansion for an additional year. An initial vote the Friday after the ruling had failed to pass by the necessary margin to continue the expansion.
    3. How will Virginia respond, given that its coverage expansion was predicated on a work requirement wavier? Like in Kentucky, will members of the Virginia General Assembly risk the political blowback of rolling back a recently started coverage expansion
    4. How will states like Georgia that are considering coverage expansion respond? Will the lack of work requirements slow progress, or do those conversations continue forward? 

    About the Author

    Chad Mulvany

    is director, healthcare finance policy, strategy and development, HFMA’s Washington, D.C., office, and a member of HFMA’s Virginia-Washington, D.C., Chapter. 

    Sign up for a free guest account and get access to five free articles every month.

    Advertisements

    Related Articles | Medicaid Compliance

    News | Price Transparency

    Healthcare News of Note: Noncompliance with new price transparency rules appears to be common

    CMS's auditing of price transparency commpliance and Tennessee's Medicaid block grant program waiver getting approved are two topics in Healthcare News of Note. Also, HFMA revamps its “Voices in Healthcare Finance” podcast.

    News | Coronavirus

    Hospitals to lose Medicare, Medicaid access in 14 weeks if they don't meet daily reporting requirements

    Hospitals will have 14 weeks to meet daily data-reporting requirements related to COVID-19 and the flu or face termination from Medicare and Medicaid.

    Blog | Compliance

    And the small print taketh away: Providers need to stay updated on HHS changes to the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund terms and conditions

    HFMA's Chad Mulvany reviews some of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Service's changes to the terms and conditions related to the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund.

    News | Medicaid Payment and Reimbursement

    Fitch warns about a potentially big hit to NFP hospitals from Medicaid payment changes

    The credit standing of not-for-profit hospitals could take a hit from proposed changes to aspects of Medicaid financing, according to a rating agency.