Get the E-newsletter
Imagine a world in which patient visits with primary
care providers consistently last more than 10 minutes, patients are engaged in their
care, and clinical staff believe they are making a sustainable difference in
their patients’ health.
For some practices, this world has become a reality
under new models designed to significantly change how primary care is
Essentially focused on population health management, these
models place primary care at the center of efforts to improve quality and reduce
costs. Reductions in utilization, admissions, and specialist and emergency
department (ED) visits are targeted through approaches such as team-based care,
chronic care management, and transitional care.
This year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) implemented its latest model: Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+),
the successor to the Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) initiative, which ran
from October 2012 through December 2016.
CPC+ charges participating practices with five key
functions: care access and continuity, care management, care comprehensiveness
and coordination, patient and caregiver engagement, and planned care and
population health. Like its CPC predecessor, CPC+ includes both government and
commercial payers who, in addition to traditional payments, pay a monthly care
management fee to support the additional care services. Unlike CPC, which used
a shared-savings approach, the new model includes incentive payments linked to
quality and utilization and, under a second track, a hybrid of fee-for-service
and CPC payments, the latter of which apply to in-office and out-of-office
evaluation and management services.
As is true for other models seeking to advance care
delivery, CPC+ is challenging. Such models rely heavily on staffing, data, and
collaboration among clinicians. But when these models work, their benefits can
be substantial for both patients and providers.
Lynn Barr, CEO of Kansas City, Mo.-based Caravan
Health, a provider of population health management services to mainly rural
practices, says new care delivery models have had such a dramatic effect on
providers that many of her clients have said they would never return to their
“old” way of delivering patient care.
“Their patients are healthier and happier and more
engaged,” she says. “The patients are using less services overall, but they’re
using local services more, which has been a real boon to our rural hospitals.
It makes sense. They make money on mammograms and colonoscopies. Having a
robust wellness program generates lots of population health revenue.”
Many of Caravan’s client practices are in the Medicare
Shared Savings Program (MSSP), with the majority in the Accountable Care
Organization Investment Model, in which practices receive loans from the Center
for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to fund population health
management programs. The loans are recovered from savings generated by participation
in the model.
Although Caravan did not work specifically with practices
in the CPC initiative, Barr says, the firm did assist about 250 practices
through the application process for CPC+.
Barr says providers believed their practices had
become more like urgent care centers—focused on treating conditions rather than
preventing them. Population health management is “reenergizing them as
community health systems,” she says.
Feedback on CPC from physicians and care
managers has been extremely positive, says Richard Shonk, MD, chief medical
officer of The Health Collaborative, a Cincinnati-based nonprofit organization
that contracted with CMS to help participants coordinate efforts and reach
Shonk says one care manager reported that the
CPC model enabled clinicians to focus more on patients, which has had several benefits.
“The patients felt better cared for, and that made them feel more engaged in
their care,” he says. “That created a sense of satisfaction and gratification within
the staff that helped their morale.”
Perhaps the most significant obstacle in achieving
success in any clinical transformation is gaining the buy-in of physicians. Primary
care providers and specialists must work in conjunction to reduce utilization
and coordinate the care of their patients.
National insurer Anthem, Inc., which has
initiated its own value-based payment models, participated in the CPC model and
is participating in CPC+. Gaining the trust of physicians has been an issue for
some practices. “Some have really committed to it, and the physician leadership
in place truly believe in it and are championing it among their peer
physicians, while others may have less experience or just less buy-in,” says
Veeneta Lakhani, vice president of provider enablement for Anthem.
Anthem addresses the trust issue through data,
education, and physician engagement, delivered
through vehicles such as webinars and practice group get-togethers, to help practices
better understand the benefit of value-based payment models and to demonstrate how
some practices have succeeded.
“We had to walk the talk—continue to bring
data, continue to bring resources,” says Julie Schilz, Anthem’s staff vice
president for care delivery transformation, who spearheaded the health plan’s CPC
Webinars have featured national speakers who
are well-respected in primary care, such as Pauline Lapin from CMMI. Physician practice
representatives have offered best practices, such as for reducing ED
In addition to accepting value-based models, physicians
must also become adjusted to the concept of team-based care. For physicians who
are accustomed to one style of care practice, working with a care manager is
very different, says David Cho, MD, FACP, co-chair of the division of primary
care at Health Quest Medical Practice, a LaGrangeville, N.Y.-based health
system that includes four hospitals, 13 primary care clinics, and multiple specialty clinics. Five of
Health Quest’s primary care practices participated in the CPC model and 10
are enrolled in CPC+.
Even more challenging has been getting
specialists onboard with a coordinated, team-based care management model, Cho says.
“We realized that as primary care providers, we
could control the cost of certain services in terms of utilization as well as
decreased visits to the ED and hospital,” Cho says. At the same time, the
imaging and other tests that specialists often order affect the total cost of
caring for a patient, which is used to evaluate the performance of primary care
practices in the model. “Our utilization we found out is very dependent on the
specialists’ costs,” Cho says.
Cho says two approaches can help win buy-in
from specialists. A specialist champion can persuade colleagues to recognize the
need to coordinate care and to comply with new care practices as they are
instituted. “The issue really is about trying to identify a leader from the
specialty side and having them understand that the overall health of the patient
depends on active integration with the patient and with the patient’s primary
care provider,” he says.
There should also be a direct line of
communication between the primary care physician and specialist to ensure the
specialist knows who to contact for questions about prior care. The primary
care physician and specialist should also establish a clear set of expectations,
which can be established in a document outlining what services are expected from
the specialist and what follow-up the primary care physician should provide.
Once a patient’s issue with chest pain has been resolved, for example, the next
step may include follow-up primary care visits for ongoing treatment of related
conditions, such as hypertension. “Even something as simple as that can really
be enlightening,” Cho says.
The primary care physician and specialist
should also have secure forms of communication, such as texting or messaging,
to transmit documentation and images in real time, Cho says.
Another challenge that turned up in the CPC model was
data aggregation from disparate systems of non-CMS payers.
Along with 75 practices that included 250
physicians, CMS and nine commercial health plans participated in the CPC model
in southwestern Ohio and northern Kentucky in which The Health Collaborative
was involved, Shonk says.
Physicians quickly realized that receiving data
sets from multiple commercial insurers and CMS would be overwhelming. The
physicians wanted to know how process improvement could be possible when their
performance—measured through utilization rates, quality outcomes, and cost data—varied
by payer, Shonk says. Consequently, the physicians wanted the data to be
managed, analyzed, and presented in a transparent and actionable format.
Fortunately, the health plans also recognized
the need for high-quality, usable data “and were willing to go down this route
with us to do that,” he says.
Participating physician practices and health
plans agreed to split the cost of developing a tool that would generate and
aggregate the data into an actionable form. “That created a somewhat
unanticipated large benefit in that it made the practices co-owners of the data
Shonk says. “They were involved in what
we called our data work group, where they had input into risk adjustment and
other methodologies,” Shonk says. “So when the
data actually came out, they were less likely to question it and argue over it
and were much more willing to accept and work on the results.”
The reports took
about 18 months to develop, including establishing agreements to satisfy data
security requirements and comply with the legal policies of each health plan,
Shonk says. “That was a major accomplishment of this approach.”
The CPC model included a shared-savings component
designed to split cost savings from improved care practices between payers and
practices. Four of the seven participating regions shared in CMS savings, which
were calculated at the regional level; three had net losses.
In terms of overall performance, the indicators show
practices are progressing.
“We’re certainly seeing that the needle is
being moved,” Anthem’s Lakhani says. “Across our value-based
programs, we have seen consistent improvement in inpatient utilization as well
as gaps-in-care closure and year-over-year improvement in quality measures.”
Still, individual performance varied
significantly. “You definitely find that all providers are not made equal, and
some are really doing very well, earning savings, and winning in these programs
while others are struggling,” she says.
Lakhani attributes this variation to differences in readiness
for value-based care in terms of mindset, resources, and data utilization. “Enablement
is all about how people, process, technology, and culture come together to
deliver a result, and that’s where we see the differences across providers.”
From Anthem’s perspective, the CPC model was
lacking in efforts to help practices understand cost and how to achieve savings
through reduced utilization, Schilz says.
“We tend in our model to look at both quality
and cost as the total package on value,” she says. “CPC, in the learning
curriculum, initially focused a lot on quality and a lot on care delivery
organization and a little less on things like utilization, such as ED visits or
inpatient utilization or perhaps cost of care related to pharmaceuticals, which
we feel is a critical component to add.”
Schilz says CPC+ addresses this issue in part
by replacing the shared savings approach with an incentive system that measures
performance at the practice level rather than the regional level, thereby helping
to foster accountability for the cost of care at each practice site.
CPC practices affiliated with The Health Collaborative
saw improvements in quality and utilization for members across Medicare
(including Medicare Advantage), Medicaid, and commercial payers, Shonk says.
Comparing data from the first quarter of 2013
to the first quarter of 2016, the number of specialty visits and primary care
visits declined by 10 percent and 9 percent, respectively, and the number of ED
visits declined by 5 to 7 percent, Shonk says. Inpatient admissions declined by
about 18 percent, including a 25 percent reduction among ambulatory sensitive
conditions, a group of about 15 chronic-disease diagnoses. This decrease included
reductions of 28 percent in admissions for congestive heart failure and 13
percent in admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
“The reduction in
admissions for chronic conditions is
probably our most significant outcome because it is exactly where you would
expect to see the impact of a methodology that paid practices to manage care,” Shonk
Despite the mixed results from CPC, the outlook for
CPC+ is encouraging. For the first round, which began in January, CMS expanded
the program from 500 to 2,983 practices. The number of payers grew from 31 to
54 and the number of regions increased from seven to 14. Round 2 of CPC+ will
begin in January 2018 with as many as 2,000 additional practices and up to 10 additional
Caravan’s Barr says the care management requirements for
CPC+ are intimidating—roughly twice the amount of work as is required in an
ACO. In addition to wellness and chronic care management, she says, CPC+ requirements
include the integration of behavioral health services and the use of data for
risk stratification and disease-specific panels.
basically the roadmap to how you would manage population health in a primary
practice if you did it all,” Barr says.
Barr says she has high hopes for CPC+ even though she believes
some practices will leave the program because of the heavy demands. “But the
ones that stick with the work are going to do a great job for their patients,”
she says. “It’s a great time to be in primary care.”
Health Quest’s Cho is also encouraged by CPC+, specifically
noting the use of psycho-social factors to identify a patient’s barriers to effective
care. He acknowledges that there are many compliance and documentation
requirements—a lot of “clicking of boxes”—that may frustrate clinicians.
“I really don’t think that advances the
delivery of health care, frankly,” he says. “I think that ensures compliance.” With
these increased requirements, he says, CPC+ will be challenging, “but I think
this is definitely the way forward.”
is a freelance healthcare writer based in Forest Lake, Ill., and a frequent
contributor to HFMA publications.
for this article: Lynn Barr,
CEO, Caravan Health, Kansas City, MO.; Richard Shonk,
MD, chief medical officer, The Health Collaborative, Cincinnati; David Cho,
MD, FACP, co-chair, division of primary care, Health Quest Medical Practice,
LaGrangeville, N.Y.; Veeneta
Lakhani, vice president, provider enablement, Anthem, Inc.,
Schilz, staff vice president, care delivery transformation, Anthem, Inc.,
David Cho photo: Courtesy of Health Quest Medical Practice.
Julie Schilz photo: Courtesy of Anthem.
HealthTrust: Solving Workforce Management Challenges
Two of HealthTrust’s senior leaders talk about strategies for optimizing the hospital workforce to improve productivity and reduce waste.
Grant Thornton: Optimizing the Ambulatory Workforce
One of Grant Thornton’s senior healthcare consultants addresses the topic of workforce management and the importance of a data-driven approach.
Cedar: Reimagining the Patient Financial Experience
Cedar’s CEO and co-founder tackles the topic of patient payment and the importance of having an innovative patient financial management system.
TRIMEDX: Moving Healthcare Providers Toward Mature Clinical Asset Management
This article includes a discussion by TRIMEDX leaders about the best ways to mature a clinical asset management program.
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Building a Clinically-Integrated Network
As value-based payment models evolve, providers are challenged to maintain superior clinical outcomes while controlling costs.
Winning in the Post-Acute Marketplace
Read more about factors contributing to the changes in the post-acute marketplace and what it means for manufacturers, physicians, clinicians, patients, and post-acute facilities as they anticipate the transition to the second curve.
Building A Common Vision with Employed Physicians
HSG helped the physicians and executives of St. Claire Regional in Morehead, Kentucky, define their shared vision for how the group would evolve over the next decade. As well as, develop the strategic and operational priorities which refocused and accelerated the group’s evolution.
Practice Performance Improvement
The client was a nine-hospital health system with 14 clinics serving communities in a multi-state market with very limited access to care, poor economic conditions, high unemployment, and a heavy Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured payer mix. In most of these communities, the system was the sole source of care.
Though the clinics were of substantial size (they employed 98 physicians) and comprised of multiple specialists, the physicians functioned as individuals and the practices lacked any real group culture.
Clinical Integration Without Spending a Fortune
Clinical integration can be expensive, but it doesn’t have to be, as this four-step road map for developing a CIN proves. Does it have to cost millions to initiate a clinical integration strategy?
Contrary to popular belief, we have clients who have generated substantial shared savings and a significant ROI over time, without massive investments. Yes, some financial capital is required for resources the CIN providers can’t bring to the table themselves. But the size of that investment can be miniscule relative to the value it produces: improved outcomes and documentation for payers.
Adding Value to Physician Compensation
Today’s concerns about physician compensation are the result of the changing healthcare environment. The transition to value is slow, but finally becoming a reality. Proactive hospitals want to ensure that provider incentives are properly aligned with ever-increasing value-based demands.
This report focuses on the three big questions HSG receives about adding value to physician compensation; Why are organizations redesigning their provider compensation plans? What elements and parameters must be part of successful compensation plans? How are organizations implementing compensation changes?
Effective Revenue Cycle Management in Your Network
Revenue Cycle Management has become an even more complex issue with declining reimbursements, implementation of Electronic Health Records, evolving local carrier determinations (LCD), and payer credentialing [The emphasis on healthcare fraud, abuse and compliance has increased the importance of accuracy of data reporting and claims filing).
The efficiency of a medical practice’s billing operations has critical impact on the financial performance. In many cases, patient billings are the primary revenue source that pays staff salaries, provider compensation and overhead operating cost. Inefficiencies or inaccurate billing will contribute to operating losses.
Succeeding in Value-Based Care
This publication identifies and outlines the necessary characteristics of a fully-functioning clinically integrated network (CIN). What it doesn’t do is detail how hospitals and providers can participate in the value-based care environment during the development process.
One common misconception is that the CIN can’t do anything significant until it has obtained the FTC’s “clinically integrated” stamp of approval. While the network must satisfy the FTC’s definition of clinical integration before single signature contracting for FFS rates and contracts can legally start, hospitals and providers can enjoy three key benefits during the development process.
Therapy: Benefits at All Levels of Care
Nearly half of all Medicare beneficiaries treated in the hospital will need post-acute care services after discharge. For these patients, a stay in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility or other post-acute care setting comes between hospital and home.
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
With the proper process, tools, and feedback mechanisms in place, budgeting can be a valuable exercise for organizations while helping hold organizational leaders accountable. Having a proper monthly variance review process is one of the most critical factors in creating a more efficient and accurate budget. Monthly variance reporting puts parameters around what is to be expected during the upcoming budget entry process.
Cost Accounting: the Key to Cost Management and Profitability
Managing the cost of patient care is the top strategic priority of most hospital CFOs today. As healthcare shifts to more data-driven decision making, having clear visibility into key volume, cost and profitability measures across clinical service lines is becoming increasingly important for both long-range and tactical planning activities. In turn, the cost accounting function in healthcare provider organizations is becoming an increasingly important and strategic function. This whitepaper includes five strategies for efficient and accurate cost accounting and service line analytics and keys to overcoming the associated challenges.