Ted Slafsky provides an insider’s perspective on where the 340B drug discount program is headed after the consequential midterm elections.
Why the Election Results Matter For 340B Hospitals
Successful Track Record
The 340B program has been remarkably effective in meeting its purpose of supporting healthcare providers’ efforts to serve low-income populations, enabling hospitals and clinics to free up resources to care for patients with various chronic conditions, including cancer, diabetes, HIV, opioid addiction, and mental health disease.
But 340B’s efficacy became significantly compromised after the 2016 elections, despite its strong bipartisan support from the beginning. President Donald Trump, who had campaigned on a platform of taking on high drug prices, deferred to advisers who said that 340B is too big and needs to be reined in. Notwithstanding outcry from both parties, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services slashed payment to 340B hospitals by close to 30 percent for medicines used to treat cancer and other complicated and deadly conditions. This $1.6 billion cut has forced three-quarters of 340B hospitals to reduce clinical and other patient services, and nearly two-thirds of them have cut staff. The hospitals also have had to reduce the amount of free and discounted drugs, close clinics, and shutter pharmacies altogether. To exacerbate the matter, the administration announced Nov. 1 that it will move forward with its plan to expand these cuts to clinics that were exempt from the original cut.
What Happened on Tuesday and Why It Matters
The Democrats’ return to power in the House of Representatives could have a significant impact on the 340B program. Reps. David McKinley (R-W.Va.) and Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) have introduced legislation that would nullify the Medicare Part B cuts. Their bill, which has widespread bipartisan support with 200 co-sponsors, will be a key priority for the hospital community. Although the bill has stalled during the election year, there is a strong chance that repeal of the cuts will become law in 2019.
Providers in the 340B program also should benefit from the implementation of a long-delayed rule that would penalize drug manufacturers that overcharge them. The rule, which was has been delayed five times in the past two years, would also result in the creation of a government website that would enable 340B stakeholders to verify whether they are purchasing pharmaceuticals at the correct price.
Stay on Your Toes
With changes coming to Washington, the next two years could be a rollercoaster ride for the 340B program. HHS may propose further restrictions including reducing the number of patients that can access discounted drugs and scaling back providers’ ability to partner with contract pharmacies to provide medicines closer to home. It will be critically important for hospital leaders and other 340B program stakeholders to remain active in advocating for support of the program with their Congressional delegations and in ensuring their messages reach the White House.
Ted Slafsky, MPP, is the founder/principal of Wexford Solutions, Washington, D.C. and the former president and CEO of 340B Health.